Best Developmental Editors For Self Published Authors

Gary Smailes | 18 November 2025

What "Best" Means for Self-Published Authors

You are not hiring a spellcheck. You are hiring a partner who helps your book land with readers and pay for its keep. Best looks different for indie authors than for a trad list. You run the whole shop, so the edit must move story and strategy.

Outcome-focused

A strong developmental edit changes results, not only sentences. Think reviews that mention "I could not stop reading." Think steady read-through to book two. Think fewer refunds and better newsletter growth because the free sample hooks.

What this looks like:

• Structure: the midpoint turns, not drifts. Each scene pushes toward a choice.
• Character arcs: wants and wounds drive action, not weather reports.
• Stakes: a clear price for failure shows up early and keeps rising.
• Pacing: slow burn where payoff is rich, speed where readers skim.
• Market fit: blurb and cover promise matches the book you wrote.

A quick test to ask in a call:

• "Where will readers stop in my sample pages, and how do we keep them?"
• "What change would lift read-through from chapter three to four?"

If an editor answers with specific scene moves, you are close.

Mini-exercise:

• Open your first three chapters. Mark the last line of each scene. Does a question, decision, or new threat pull the reader forward? If not, list one change point per scene and fix toward it.

Indie-savvy

Self-publishing runs on a sequence. Beta readers, developmental edit, line and copy edit, proofread, formatting. Then metadata, categories, keywords, and a blurb that sells the same experience the pages deliver. The best editors know where their work fits, and they guide choices that ripple into launch.

Examples of indie-savvy moves:

• They flag where the Kindle sample cuts off, then help you land a micro-cliff inside that window.
• They spot a slow opener in a KU-heavy niche and recommend a tighter chapter one so pages read do not stall.
• They keep series planning in view, so book one seeds a promise the next book fulfills.
• They speak retailer language. BISAC versus browse categories, subtitle strategy, heat-level signals, content warnings when needed.

Ask:

• "How do your notes feed my blurb, categories, and look-inside?"
• "Where would you place the first big turn to suit my subgenre and sample length?"

Genre expertise

You need an editor who reads and respects your lane. Each niche carries a promise. Break it and readers bounce. Deliver it and they forgive small stumbles.

A few quick snapshots:

• Romance: heat level, consent cues, a satisfying ending that matches the shelf. Closed door reads different from erotic romance. The editor should know the difference without judgment.
• Mystery and crime: fair play clue plants, red herrings, a reveal that feels earned. The murderer should not walk in at the end with a new motive.
• SFF: world rules that constrain choices, not a lecture on coins. Terms stay consistent, and exposition serves conflict.
• Memoir: ethics around real people, a clear arc, reflection that earns its space.

Try this:

• Name three comps. Write your reader promise in one line, starting with "You get." Example, "You get a grumpy-sunshine small-town romance with medium heat and a dog." Share this with the editor. See if their notes uphold it.

Clear deliverables

No one wants a vague "I'll take a look." You need tools you can act on.

Standard kit:

• Editorial letter. A roadmap, usually 5 to 15 pages. Big-picture notes on structure, character, stakes, pacing, and market fit. Clear priorities, not a kitchen sink.
• Annotated manuscript. Comments tied to scenes and paragraphs. Questions, signposts, and examples. Track Changes used to model a line-level approach without overwriting voice.
• Scene map or beat sheet. A list of chapters or scenes with goal, conflict, outcome, and word count. Gaps and redundancies jump out here.
• Follow-up support. A call to debrief, plus a set window for Q&A. You do not need to decode the letter alone.

How to use them:

• Read the letter, sleep on it, then mark three must-fix items.
• Use the scene map to make keep, cut, merge, or move calls.
• Tackle global issues first, then circle back to comments.

Coaching mindset

The best editors diagnose root causes and respect voice. They push where readers stumble, and they explain why.

Listen for:

• Questions that reveal intent. "What does she want in this scene?" beats "tighten."
• Options, not orders. "Two paths. Either move the reveal to the end of chapter five, or add a consequence in chapter three that pressures the choice."
• Notes that stay specific. "This dialogue repeats beats from page 42. Trim lines 3 to 8, or convert to subtext with a prop."

Bad sign:

• Generic advice that treats every manuscript the same.
• Line rewrites that sound like a different author.

A small test:

• Send 1,000 words. Do the notes preserve your diction while naming hard truths? If you feel seen and challenged, you found a coach, not a hijacker.

Professional standards

Professionalism protects both sides. You are trusting months of work and your publishing plan.

Expect:

• References or testimonials you can verify.
• A sample developmental edit or a paid sample, scope defined upfront.
• A written agreement. Scope, deliverables, timeline, revision support, confidentiality, and payment milestones. Clear terms for rescheduling or cancellation.
• Transparency on pricing. Per-word or flat fee tied to deliverables. No surprise upsells.

Practical step:

• Before you sign, restate the plan in an email. "You will deliver an editorial letter, an annotated manuscript with comments, a scene map, and a one-hour call by [date]. I will revise and send follow-up questions within [window]." Ask them to confirm. This keeps everyone aligned.

Best is not a trophy. Best is the editor whose notes make your book stronger, your launch smoother, and your readers happy to turn the page. Keep your bar high

Where to Find and Vet Developmental Editors

Start wide, then sharpen. You want editors who understand story, genre, and the indie workflow. Here is where to look, and how to sort the promising from the noisy.

Start with vetted directories and marketplaces

Go to the Editorial Freelancers Association, CIEP in the UK, ALLi's Partner Directory, and Reedsy. Use their filters for developmental editing and your genre.

When a profile opens, scan for signals:

• Services list includes developmental editing, not only copyediting or proofreading.
• Genres match yours. Look for mentions like epic fantasy, locked-room mystery, closed-door romance, or upmarket memoir.
• Deliverables named in plain terms. Editorial letter, annotated manuscript, scene map, follow-up call.
• Process and timeline spelled out. How many weeks. What happens after you read the letter.
• A sample edit offer or a paid test.
• Testimonials with clear outcomes. "Helped me find the midpoint and raise stakes," not "nice to work with."

On Reedsy, shortlist three to five. Read their portfolios and project descriptions, then request quotes with the same brief. Clarity on your side leads to better replies.

Tap genre associations and communities

Go where your readers hang out. Horror Writers Association, Romance Writers of America chapters, SFWA member forums, SCBWI for children's and YA, and crime or mystery guilds. Ask for referrals from writers one step ahead of you.

Keep the ask specific. Try a note like this:

• "Seeking a developmental editor for an 85k paranormal romance, dual POV. Needs experience with heat level low, series arcs, and KU readership."
• "Looking for SFF dev edit, 120k, political focus. Prior work with intrigue, multi-POV, and map-heavy worlds."

Precision draws the right names. Vague asks invite a flood of off-target recommendations.

Use conferences and courses to audition editors

Workshops and panels reveal an editor's brain in real time. Listen for how they diagnose a page. Do they talk about goals, stakes, scene turns, reader promise. Do they offer two or three ways forward, or only one "fix."

Short courses double as a test project without risking a full edit. You get a sense of their tone, their homework load, and whether their notes leave you energized rather than bruised.

If a conference offers pitch tables with editors, bring two printed pages, your logline, and a clear question. "Where does this stall," beats "What do you think."

Ask your author networks

Targeted Facebook groups, Discord servers, and Substack communities work well when you choose groups aligned with your comps. Post a short intro with your genre, word count, goal, and pain point.

When someone recommends an editor, follow up with two questions:

• What deliverables did you receive, and how useful were they in revision.
• What changed in your book's structure, pacing, or reader feedback after the edit.

Praise without specifics helps no one. You want proof of impact, not only vibes.

Review portfolios with a clear eye

A strong portfolio shows thinking, not only names. Look for:

• Case studies with before and after examples. Even a single scene comparison shows method.
• Sample editorial letters or excerpts. Tone matters. You want direct, respectful notes with priority and sequence.
• Annotated pages with comments on scene goals, logic gaps, and POV control.
• Books in your niche that perform. Chart rank, reviews, or series read-through are fair signs. Be mindful, some editors work under NDAs. Lack of public credit is not a disqualifier.

Cross-check public claims. If a profile lists titles, visit retailer pages. Read the opening through Look Inside. Do you see crisp goals and a clear turn by the end of chapter one. Does the pacing match the promise.

Run a first filter before you book a call

Before a discovery call, apply a quick checklist. Ten minutes, three tabs open, quick pass.

• Do they define developmental editing in their own words, and keep it distinct from copyediting.
• Do they show genre fluency with your niche, including tropes and reader promise.
• Do they display sample margin comments that focus on causality, escalation, and POV.
• Do they outline deliverables, a timeline, and revision support.
• Do they offer a sample developmental edit, free or paid.
• Do they have references or testimonials with specifics.

If two or more bullets read weak, move on. Time is precious. So is money.

A mini vetting exercise

Set a 30-minute timer. Pick one directory and one community.

• Directory sprint, 15 minutes:
  1. Filter by developmental editing and your genre.
  2. Open five profiles in new tabs.
  3. Star the ones with clear deliverables, sample edits, and genre match. Close the rest.
  4. Draft a short inquiry for the top two.
• Community sprint, 15 minutes:
  1. Post a referral request with a one-sentence logline, word count, and pain point.
  2. DM two authors who share your comps and ask about their editor's process and outcomes.
  3. Capture names, links, and notes in a simple doc.

By the end, you will hold three to five credible candidates, plus notes on fit.

Reading between the lines

Pay attention to how editors talk about voice. Good editors preserve it. They suggest scene purpose, stakes, and structure, then ask you to rewrite in your language. If samples show "accept all changes" line edits on style, step back.

Look for prioritization. Do they separate macro notes from sentence-level nips. Do they tie advice to reader experience and genre norms. That discipline tells you how smooth your revision path will feel.

Above all, match expertise to your goals. A thriller editor who loves relentless pace might not be right for a slow-burn literary fantasy. A romance specialist who tracks heat levels and beats will serve a romcom far better than a generalist.

Finding the right partner takes effort. The payoff lands on the page, in your reviews, and in the next book you write.

Evaluate Fit: Questions, Samples, and Red Flags

Hiring a developmental editor is part partnership, part pressure test. Before any contract, test for alignment. Ask sharp questions, review a sample, watch for warning signs. A good match saves months and money.

Questions for a discovery call

Use these prompts, then listen for how the editor thinks on the fly. Strong answers tie observations to reader experience, genre norms, and scene mechanics.

• What patterns do you see in my sample pages and synopsis?
  • Listen for specifics. “Your opening sets mood, but no scene goal appears until page three. The antagonist exists off-page. Stakes read social, not life-and-death.” Vague praise or generic “flows well” feedback offers little value.
• How do you prioritize fixes, structure to scene to line?
  • Look for a staircase. “We start with macro beats, then scene purpose, then line work after a stable outline.” A grab bag approach wastes revision energy.
• What deliverables and revision support are included?
  • Expect a clear list. Editorial letter, annotated manuscript, scene map, debrief call, Q&A window. Fuzzy promises lead to scope creep and stress.
• How do you preserve author voice while suggesting rewrites?
  • Good editors point to function, not word choice. “I will mark places where voice carries, then show where clarity slips. Rewrites arrive as options, not hard fixes.”
• What experience do you have with my subgenre, comps, and reader expectations?
  • Listen for fluency. Tropes by name. Heat levels for romance. Fair-play clue planting for mystery. Worldbuilding delivery for SFF. Memoir ethics for nonfiction with a life on the page.

Quick gut check during the call:

• Do examples reference scenes, turns, and outcomes, not abstractions.
• Does the editor ask smart questions about your goals and timeline.
• Do you feel challenged and supported at the same time.

Request a sample developmental edit

Ask for 1,000 to 2,000 words, plus a short note. A strong sample shows diagnostic depth, tone, and workflow.

What to send:

• Opening pages in standard format, plus a 1–2 paragraph synopsis.
• One or two focus questions. For example, “Does the hook land,” or “Where does POV drift.”

What to expect in return:

• Inline comments tied to beats. Goal, conflict, turn, outcome.
• Notes on structure and market fit. “This reads cozy, while comps promise gritty,” or “Chapter break arrives before payoff.”
• A brief letter that ranks problems by impact and suggests steps.

How to review the sample:

• Specificity: “Set a concrete want by paragraph two, retrieve the ledger or lose the stall,” beats “Tighten the opening.”
• Actionability: “Cut the mentor’s interiority and show tells through gesture,” beats “Reduce head-hopping.”
• Clarity: Comments read clean and direct, with page anchors. No waffle, no jargon clouds.

Mini exercise. Copy three sample comments into a doc. For each, write the revision move in one sentence. If a move feels unclear, ask for one more example during the debrief.

Red flags

Protect your voice and budget. These signs suggest a poor match.

• Guarantees of bestseller status or agent deals. No editor controls reader response.
• Feedback focused mainly on grammar. Developmental work addresses structure, stakes, and arcs.
• No written scope or contract. Or hourly billing with no estimate or cap.
• Refusal to provide a sample, references, or a process overview.
• Pushy upsells, vague timelines, or line edits that overwrite voice. “Accept all changes” signals trouble in this phase.

Spotty communication counts too. Late replies during sales often foreshadow missed deadlines during edits.

Signs of a strong fit

Look for rigor plus respect.

• Notes that name problems and offer more than one path forward. “Move the inciting incident earlier, or add a proxy confrontation to bring pressure on-page.”
• Rationale tied to reader experience and genre norms. “Romantic tension dips because no forced proximity beat follows the confession.”
• Curiosity about your goals. Series plan, KDP vs wide distribution, timeline for launch.
• Process transparency. Clear schedule, milestones, and support window. Examples of prior work in your lane.

Sample comments, good vs weak

A few quick contrasts help sharpen your eye.

• Good: “Scene lacks a clear goal. Give Mara a concrete want by paragraph two. Retrieve the ledger or lose the stall. Then block success with a rival’s bribe.”
• Weak: “This part feels slow.”
• Good: “POV slips on page 7. Keep us in Mara. Show the mentor’s deceit through eye contact and cup tapping, not internal lines.”
• Weak: “Watch POV.”
• Good: “Worldbuilding arrives in a two-page block. Move rules into action through a failed permit hearing. Readers learn while tension rises.”
• Weak: “Too much exposition.”

A quick scoring rubric

After the call and sample, score each editor from 1 to 5 on:

• Genre fluency.
• Diagnostic clarity.
• Actionability of notes.
• Communication style.
• Deliverables and timeline.
• Cost relative to scope.

Totals matter, but so does trust. You will spend weeks with these notes. Choose the partner who sharpens your story, respects your voice, and shows a path you feel eager to walk.

Pricing, Packages, and Timelines

You want two things from pricing. Transparency and no surprises. A solid editor offers both.

How editors price

Most quotes land in one of two buckets.

• Per word. The fee scales with length. Helpful if your book sits near a round number, like 70,000 words, and you plan to trim or expand.
• Flat fee. A single price tied to clear deliverables. Some editors use length bands, like up to 80,000, 80,001 to 100,000, and so on.

The scope should be explicit. At minimum, expect:

• Editorial letter with prioritized notes.
• Annotated manuscript with comments in Track Changes.
• Optional scene map or beat sheet.
• A debrief call and a short Q&A window.

Ballpark ranges and what shifts price

Developmental editing often falls between 0.02 to 0.08 dollars per word, or 1,500 to 8,000 dollars and up. Prices move based on:

• Length. Every extra 10,000 words adds reading and analysis time.
• Complexity. Dual timelines, multi POV, experimental structure, heavy worldbuilding.
• Draft quality. If the draft has not seen beta readers, expect deeper diagnostic work.
• Deliverables. Letter only versus letter plus extensive inline notes and a scene map.
• Support level. Debrief call length, follow-up windows, a second pass, or coaching add-ons.
• Schedule. Rush work often adds 20 to 40 percent.

Taxes, currency conversion, and payment processing can affect the final number too, especially across borders.

Example math

You have 80,000 words. Rate is 0.04 dollars per word.

• 80,000 x 0.04 equals 3,200 dollars for the main pass.
• Add a revision check of 10,000 words at 0.02 dollars per word equals 200 dollars.
• Add a one hour coaching call each month for two months at 120 dollars per hour equals 240 dollars.

Total, 3,640 dollars. This is why itemized quotes help. You see where money goes, and where to trim or invest.

Mini exercise. Multiply your word count by three rates you see on quotes, low, mid, high. Add any extras you care about, like a revision check. Pick the combo that protects quality without wrecking your launch budget.

Timelines you can plan around

A full developmental pass often runs 2 to 8 weeks. Word count, genre depth, and added support shape the schedule. A common flow looks like this:

• Week 1, setup and first read. The editor reviews your synopsis, comps, and goals.
• Weeks 2 to 3, deep read with notes.
• Week 4, editorial letter drafted and refined.
• Week 5, manuscript annotations finished.
• Week 6, debrief call. Files delivered. Q&A window opens for 1 to 4 weeks.
• Optional, revision check within 2 to 3 weeks of your resubmission.

Build buffer around this. If you plan to format in June, hand off the manuscript in April, not late May. Leave time for revisions, cover tweaks, and ARC distribution.

Ask about blackout dates, holidays, and queue policies. A reliable editor shares a start date, delivery date, and what happens if either of you need to shift by a week.

Budget-friendly options that still move the book forward

You do not need to buy the Cadillac package to make progress. Smart choices for tight budgets:

• Manuscript assessment. A diagnostic letter only. No inline comments. Fastest and cheapest way to spot structural issues across the whole book.
• Partial developmental edit. First 50 pages plus a synopsis or beat sheet. Great for testing the hook, POV control, and voice. Useful before finishing a series book.
• Coaching package. Chapter by chapter, with standing calls. Helpful if you want ongoing accountability and iterative problem solving.
• Outline or beat review. Before drafting or redrafting. Prevents months of wandering.
• Scene map only. The editor maps goals, conflicts, and turns across the book. You revise with the map in hand.

Pick one that answers your main pain point, sagging middle, muddy POV, flat stakes, slow start. Then revise with focus.

How to compare quotes

Line up three proposals. For each, check:

• Deliverables. Letter length, annotated file, scene map, calls, and support window.
• Depth. Page counts for comments, number of examples, and whether they rank fixes by impact.
• Timeline. Start date, delivery date, and revision check timing.
• Add-ons. Second pass pricing, coaching rates, rush fees, and file formats.
• Experience in your lane. Recent titles, comps knowledge, and reader promise fluency.

Create a simple grid. Score from 1 to 5 on clarity, actionability, communication, scope, and cost relative to value. The top score often aligns with your gut.

Contract essentials

A clear contract protects both sides. Look for:

• Scope. What the editor will do and what they will not do. Developmental editing, not copyediting.
• Deliverables. Exact files, format, and approximate length of the letter.
• Schedule. Start date, delivery date, debrief call window, and Q&A duration.
• Revision support. What a revision check includes, word caps, and turnaround time.
• Payment. Total fee, deposit of 25 to 50 percent, milestones, and accepted methods.
• Rush and reschedule terms. Fees, notice periods, and new dates.
• Confidentiality and IP. Your rights remain yours. No sharing pages without permission.
• Cancellation. Kill fee, how to halt work, and what happens to the deposit.
• Data handling. How files are stored, backed up, and deleted on request.

If a proposal leaves any of this vague, ask for edits before you sign.

Quick questions that save money and time

• If I cut the draft by 10,000 words, how does the fee change.
• What goes into the letter versus inline comments.
• How do you define a second pass, and what does it cost.
• What is the response time during the Q&A window.
• What format should I send, and how should I track changes on my end.

Clear pricing, clear scope, clear schedule. That trio turns a stressful spend into a planned investment. Your book earns the time you give it. Your future readers will feel the difference.

Shortlisting and Outreach Toolkit

You found a handful of editors who look promising. Time to move from browsing to booking. Send a clean packet, ask smart questions, and compare on the same scale.

What to send in your first email

Give editors enough signal to judge fit without a scavenger hunt.

Include:

• Genre and subgenre. Target audience. Two or three comps from the last few years. Word count.
• A 1–2 paragraph synopsis or jacket copy. Current status, draft or revised or beta-read.
• Goals and timeline. KDP exclusive or wide. Standalone or series plan. Any hard dates.
• Pain points in one line each. For example, sagging middle or muddy POV or soft stakes.
• 10–20 sample pages from the opening. Standard format, double-spaced, 12 pt, Times New Roman, 1-inch margins, page numbers, header with name and title.
• File names that help. LastName_Title_SamplePages.docx. LastName_Title_Synopsis.docx.

Mini exercise for a sharp logline:

• Protagonist + goal + obstacle + stakes.
• Fill-in: When [protagonist] tries to [goal], [obstacle] blocks progress, risking [stakes].

Email template you can adapt

Subject: Developmental edit request, [Genre/Subgenre], [Word Count] words, comps [Comp 1] and [Comp 2]

Hello [Editor Name],

I write [genre/subgenre]. Working title: [Title]. Length: [XX,000] words. Audience: [target]. Comps: [Comp 1] and [Comp 2].

I am seeking a developmental edit in [month or timeframe]. Would you share availability, deliverables, and rates.

Focus questions:

• Does the opening hook land by page 10.
• Any POV drift in chapters 1 to 3.
• Does the midpoint turn raise costs.

A short synopsis appears below. Opening pages attached in standard format. Also attached, a brief style sheet and a beat outline.

Would you offer a paid sample on 1,000 to 2,000 words and a short call to confirm fit.

Thank you for your time,

[Your Name]

[Website or social link]

[Deadline window]

Pro tip:

• Paste the synopsis under your signature for quick scanning.
• Keep attachments under two megabytes.
• PDF for the synopsis, .docx for pages, unless guidelines say otherwise.

How to score your shortlist

Use a simple 1 to 5 scale. Higher means stronger fit. Pick no more than six editors to compare.

Score each on:

• Genre expertise. Proof of work in your niche, plus comps they know by name.
• Diagnostic clarity. Notes point to goals, turns, and outcomes, not vague “tighten” remarks.
• Actionability. Steps you can follow. Options, not only one path.
• Communication style. Respectful, candid, and focused on reader experience.
• Deliverables. Editorial letter, annotated manuscript, scene map, and a debrief window.
• Timeline. Start date and return date align with your plan.
• Cost. Transparent fee tied to scope. Deposit and milestones clear.

Quick rubric:

• 5, strong proof in your subgenre, specific diagnosis, clear plan, generous support.
• 3, mixed signals, some genre overlap, decent notes, light support.
• 1, mismatch on genre, grammar-only focus, no scope clarity.

Tiebreakers:

• Sample pages leave you eager to revise.
• Notes protect voice while pushing for stronger choices.

Prep for success before you hit send

Give editors the tools they need to help you fast.

Style sheet basics:

• Names with preferred spellings and pronunciations.
• Places, titles, honorifics, and capitalization rules.
• Timeline, calendar, ages, and key dates.
• World terms, magic or tech rules, units of measure.
• Pronouns and identity notes for key characters.

Beat outline, one line per beat:

• Status quo.
• Inciting incident.
• First plot turn.
• Midpoint reversal.
• All is lost.
• Climax.
• Resolution.

File hygiene:

• Use clean .docx files. No tracked changes in the sample.
• Page headers with Name, Title, and Email.
• Version label in the file name, for example v3.

Follow-up plan:

• If no reply after seven to ten days, send a short nudge.
• If an editor declines, thank them and move on.
• Once you pick a partner, let others know you filled the slot.

Common outreach pitfalls to avoid

• A wall of backstory in the first email. Keep the synopsis short.
• Sending a full manuscript on first contact. Send opening pages only.
• No comps, no audience, no stakes. Editors need context.
• Asking for a guarantee on sales or bestseller status. No one honest offers that.
• Accept-all-changes test. Voice gets overwritten. Seek questions and rationale.
• Pushing for a rush slot with no schedule buffer. Build slack into your plan.

A simple outreach timeline

• Day 1, send three to five messages with the packet above.
• Day 7, follow up with anyone who has not replied.
• Day 10 to 14, review samples, score the matrix, book the top choice.
• Day 15, confirm scope and dates in writing, pay deposit, deliver full materials on the agreed handoff date.

Clarity and courtesy do heavy lifting here. The right editor will show you where the book sings and where structure wobbles. Your job in this phase, present a sharp snapshot, ask focused questions, and choose the partner who helps you think like a reader.

Frequently Asked Questions

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent

Leave this empty

Get free book