The Hidden Skills Every Great Editor Has

Gary Smailes
Gary Smailes | 17 November 2025
The Hidden Skills Every Great Editor Has

Reader Empathy and Market Awareness

Great editors wear two hats while they read. One belongs to your ideal reader, sitting in a bookstore deciding whether to buy your book. The other belongs to an acquisitions editor who needs to sell your manuscript to a publishing house. Both perspectives are essential. Neither is automatic.

Reading like your audience and the industry

Your reader picked up your book for a reason. They want to be entertained, informed, or transformed. They have expectations based on your genre, your cover, and your opening pages. If those expectations go unmet, they stop reading. Your editor's job is to spot these disconnects before publication.

Genre promise versus delivery. A romance reader expects romantic tension, chemistry, and a satisfying emotional payoff. A thriller reader wants escalating danger, plot twists, and a resolution that makes sense. A business book reader seeks actionable insights and credible expertise. When manuscripts fail to deliver these core elements, readers feel cheated.

Example from my files. Mystery novel opened with a compelling murder and an interesting detective. By chapter three, the investigation stalled while the author spent forty pages on the detective's childhood trauma and failed marriage. The backstory was well-written but broke the genre promise. Mystery readers want investigation and clues, not therapy sessions. We moved the personal material to subplots and flashbacks, keeping the investigation moving forward.

Reading with fresh eyes. You know your story inside and out. Your ideal reader encounters it cold. What seems obvious to you might confuse them. What feels crucial to the plot might bore them. Editors simulate that first-read experience by approaching your manuscript as strangers.

Acquisitions editor radar. Publishing professionals evaluate manuscripts for commercial viability. They ask: Does this book have a clear target audience? Is the voice distinctive but accessible? Does the pacing match current market expectations? Is the word count appropriate for the genre? These questions shape their acquisition decisions and should inform editorial choices.

Story from the publishing world. Literary fiction manuscript came in at 140,000 words with beautiful prose but glacial pacing. The author had written a gorgeous meditation on family relationships. The market wanted literary fiction under 90,000 words with forward momentum. We identified the core story buried within the beautiful writing and trimmed without losing the voice. The book sold to a major publisher.

Genre knowledge without formulaic thinking

Every genre has conventions, tropes, and reader expectations developed over decades. Smart editors know these patterns without becoming slaves to them. The goal is informed choice, not paint-by-numbers storytelling.

Understanding conventions as tools. Romance readers expect a happily-ever-after or happy-for-now ending. Mystery readers expect fair play clues. Fantasy readers expect worldbuilding that makes internal sense. These are not restrictions but promises you make to your audience. Breaking them requires intention and skill, not accident.

Trope awareness prevents clichés. The chosen one, the dark lord, the spunky heroine, the brooding love interest—these character types exist because they work. But readers have seen them countless times. Fresh execution or clever subversion makes familiar elements feel new again.

Reader expectations as guideposts. Science fiction readers tolerate detailed technical explanations that would bore mystery readers. Literary fiction readers expect careful prose that might feel pretentious in a thriller. Knowing your audience's tolerance levels helps calibrate your choices.

Innovation within boundaries. The best genre fiction respects conventions while finding new angles. The Martian is hard science fiction but reads like a comedy. Gone Girl is psychological suspense with unreliable narrators who break traditional sympathy rules. Both succeed because they understand their genres deeply enough to innovate intelligently.

Practical example. Urban fantasy manuscript featured a vampire detective solving supernatural crimes. Familiar territory. The twist was that the vampire was also a single mother juggling daycare pickup with demon hunting. The parenting angle was fresh but needed careful handling. Too much domestic routine would slow the supernatural action. Too little would make the hook feel gimmicky. We balanced both elements by making parenting challenges drive plot complications. The vampire mom had to solve cases during school hours and hide supernatural dangers from her daughter. The familiar premise became fresh through specific execution.

Competitive analysis for positioning

Your book does not exist in a vacuum. Readers compare it to other books they have enjoyed. Publishers compare it to recent successes and failures. Understanding your competition helps position your manuscript for the best possible reception.

Comparison titles as benchmarks. When publishers pitch your book to bookstores, they say things like "for readers who enjoyed X and Y." These comparison titles establish expectations for tone, pacing, length, and audience. Choosing the right comps helps everyone understand what you have written and where it fits.

Market timing matters. Publishing moves in waves. Vampire romance dominated for years, then gave way to dystopian young adult, then psychological thrillers. Your manuscript might be perfectly executed but poorly timed. Editors who track these trends help position books for maximum impact or suggest adjustments that improve market fit.

Learning from successful execution. What makes one psychological thriller a bestseller while another disappears? Often, the difference lies in pacing, character development, or plot structure. Studying successful comps reveals techniques you might adopt or adapt.

Avoiding oversaturated territory. If the market is flooded with unreliable narrator thrillers, your unreliable narrator thriller needs exceptional execution or a unique angle. Competitive analysis reveals when to lean into trends and when to zag away from them.

Case study from recent years. Memoir about overcoming addiction and finding purpose through ultramarathon running. The comparison titles were Wild by Cheryl Strayed and Born to Run by Christopher McDougall. The first showed how personal transformation stories sell. The second demonstrated reader appetite for running content. But both books were already ten years old. We researched more recent successes and found Untamed by Glennon Doyle and Endure by Alex Hutchinson. The newer comps revealed current preferences for shorter chapters, more diverse perspectives, and science-backed insights. The manuscript adjustments improved both readability and market positioning.

Comp titles reveal reader expectations:

Action step: Build your reader and market profile

Before you edit a single sentence, create a one-page document that captures who you are writing for and how your book fits the current market. This becomes your editorial north star.

Reader profile essentials:

Competitive analysis template:

    Diagnostic Thinking and Editorial Judgment

    The difference between a good editor and a great one often comes down to pattern recognition. Anyone learns to spot typos and awkward sentences. But seeing the underlying structural issues that create those surface problems? That takes diagnostic thinking.

    Pattern recognition over problem hunting

    Weak manuscripts rarely fail because of isolated issues. They fail because of systemic problems that manifest in multiple ways throughout the text. Great editors trace symptoms back to their root causes instead of treating each problem in isolation.

    The iceberg principle. When you see "low tension" throughout a manuscript, the surface problem might be boring scenes. But the real issue often lies deeper: unclear stakes, passive protagonists, or scenes without conflict. Fix the root cause and dozens of tension problems resolve themselves.

    Example from my editing desk. Fantasy novel had readers complaining about pacing in the middle section. The author wanted to cut scenes and add action sequences. I dug deeper and found the real problem: the protagonist stopped making meaningful choices after the first act. She was being dragged through events by other characters. No amount of sword fights would fix passive storytelling. We gave her agency and difficult decisions. The pacing problems vanished without cutting a single scene.

    Common symptom-to-cause patterns:

    • Boring dialogue: Characters lack distinct voices or conflicting goals
    • Confusing plot: Missing cause-and-effect chains between scenes
    • Flat characters: No internal conflict or competing desires
    • Dragging middle: Protagonist stops driving the story forward
    • Unsatisfying ending: Setup and payoff don't align with story questions

    Questions that reveal root causes:

    • What does the protagonist want and what prevents them from getting it?
    • What would happen if this scene disappeared? Would readers notice?
    • Do characters have reasons to lie, withhold information, or disagree?
    • Is each scene building toward the climax or wandering sideways?
    • Are the stakes clear and escalating throughout the story?

    Pattern recognition in nonfiction. Business books that lose readers often suffer from weak organization, not weak content. Self-help books that fail to persuade usually lack credible evidence, not compelling anecdotes. Memoirs that feel disconnected often need a stronger theme to tie events together.

    Case study. Self-help book about productivity kept getting feedback that the advice felt generic. The author wanted to add more research and statistics. But the real problem was structural: each chapter offered ten different strategies without explaining how they connected to each other or when to use which approach. Readers felt overwhelmed, not empowered. We reorganized around three core principles and showed how all the strategies supported those foundations. The content stayed the same but became far more useful.

    Triage by impact and cost

    Not all editorial problems are created equal. Some fixes transform the entire manuscript with minimal effort. Others require massive rewrites for marginal improvement. Smart editors prioritize changes that deliver maximum value for minimum cost.

    High-impact, low-cost fixes:

    • Clarifying stakes and goals in the opening chapters
    • Cutting redundant scenes that repeat information
    • Strengthening scene endings with cliffhangers or revelations
    • Adding sensory details to generic settings
    • Giving minor characters distinct dialogue patterns

    High-impact, high-cost fixes:

    • Changing point of view throughout the manuscript
    • Restructuring chronology from linear to flashback format
    • Adding or removing major characters
    • Changing genre conventions (turning literary fiction into romance)
    • Rewriting endings that don't match reader expectations

    Low-impact fixes (often deferred):

    • Word choice optimization in already-clear sentences
    • Minor continuity details that don't affect plot
    • Stylistic preferences that don't serve clarity
    • Formatting inconsistencies that copyeditors catch later
    • Research updates that don't change core arguments

    The revision hierarchy. Structure before style, always. Fix plot holes before polishing prose. Resolve character motivation before tweaking dialogue. Editors who start with line-level changes often find their careful work undone when bigger structural changes become necessary later.

    Real example from memoir editing. Author wanted help making her prose more lyrical. I found beautiful writing throughout but noticed the chronology jumped around confusingly. Readers needed signposts to follow her journey through addiction and recovery. We added clear time markers and smooth transitions between time periods. The prose didn't change, but the book became far more readable. High impact, low cost.

    Questions for effective triage:

    • Will this change improve the reading experience for most readers?
    • How many other problems might this fix solve simultaneously?
    • Does this align with the book's core promise to readers?
    • Is this change essential now or something we address in later drafts?
    • Would fixing this create new problems elsewhere in the manuscript?

    Framing issues as solvable choices

    Authors don't need editors to tell them their work has problems. They need editors to show them realistic solutions. The best editorial feedback presents options with clear trade-offs, letting authors make informed decisions about their own work.

    Choice architecture matters. Instead of "This character needs more development," try "Here are three ways to deepen this character: give her a backstory that contrasts with her current situation, create internal conflict between what she wants and what she needs, or put her in scenes where she must choose between competing loyalties. Each approach would affect the pacing differently."

    The two-option minimum. Single solutions feel like mandates. Multiple options feel like collaboration. Authors are more likely to implement changes they had a voice in choosing.

    Trade-off transparency. Every editorial choice has consequences. Faster pacing might sacrifice character development. Deeper themes might slow plot momentum. Complex structures might challenge casual readers. Authors deserve to understand these trade-offs before choosing their path.

    Example query from a thriller manuscript:

    Instead of: "Chapter 3 is boring and needs more action."

    Try: "Chapter 3 establishes important character relationships but slows the thriller pacing. Three options: (1) Add immediate physical danger to maintain tension while building relationships, (2) Move the relationship-building to high-stakes scenes later, or (3) Cut this chapter and reveal character information through action in subsequent scenes. Option 1 keeps your character development but requires new plot elements. Option 2 maintains pacing but delays emotional investment. Option 3 speeds the story but loses some depth. Which direction feels right for your vision?"

    Solution categories that work:

    • Expansion: Add scenes, characters, or information
    • Compression: Cut or combine elements for efficiency
    • Relocation: Move content to more effective positions
    • Substitution: Replace weak elements with stronger alternatives
    • Reframing: Change perspective or context without changing events

    Questions that generate solutions:

    • What are three different ways to solve this problem?
    • What would happen if we tried the opposite approach?
    • Which solution best serves your target readers?

    Voice Preservation and Line-Level Musicality

    The hardest part of line editing isn't fixing bad sentences. It's improving good sentences without destroying what made them work in the first place. Every author has a voice, and your job as an editor is to amplify it, not replace it with your own.

    Protecting voice while elevating clarity

    Author voice is fragile. One heavy-handed edit and you've turned Virginia Woolf into a technical manual. The trick is learning to separate voice from clarity issues, then finding solutions that preserve the former while fixing the latter.

    Voice versus clarity confusion. Beginning editors often mistake unclear writing for distinctive voice. They leave confusing sentences untouched because they seem "artistic" or heavily edit distinctive passages because they seem "wrong." Both approaches miss the mark.

    Real example from literary fiction. Author wrote: "The memory of her mother's hands, flour-dusted and warm, kneading dough on Sunday mornings when the world still held promises it hadn't yet broken, came to her now in this sterile hospital room where promises went to die."

    A clarity-focused editor might shorten this to: "She remembered her mother's hands kneading dough on Sunday mornings. Now she sat in a sterile hospital room."

    But that destroys the voice. The original sentence has rhythm, emotion, and thematic weight. The problem isn't length or complexity, it's the awkward phrase "where promises went to die." Too on-the-nose, too forced. Better solution: "The memory of her mother's hands, flour-dusted and warm, kneading dough on Sunday mornings when the world still held promises, came to her now in this sterile hospital room." The voice stays intact, the meaning gets clearer, the rhythm improves.

    Cadence adjustments that preserve style. Every author has natural speech patterns. Some write in short, punchy bursts. Others prefer flowing, elaborate constructions. Your edits should work with these patterns, not against them.

    For staccato writers: Add connective tissue between thoughts without making sentences longer. Use punctuation and paragraph breaks to control pacing.

    For flowing writers: Look for places where sentences collapse under their own weight. Break them at natural pause points or remove unnecessary qualifiers.

    Imagery that serves the story. Authors often include vivid descriptions because they sound good, not because they advance the narrative. Great editors know when to preserve beautiful language and when to cut it for story momentum.

    Case study from thriller editing. Author described a character's apartment in gorgeous, literary detail for three paragraphs. Beautiful writing, but wrong for the genre and pacing. Instead of cutting entirely, we kept the most striking details and wove them into action: "He searched through her books, scattered now like broken wings across the hardwood floor." Same imagery, better integration.

    Questions for voice-preserving edits:

    • Does this change sound like something the author would write?
    • Am I making the writing clearer or just different?
    • What is this sentence trying to accomplish beyond conveying information?
    • How does this passage contribute to the book's overall tone?
    • Would a fan of this author recognize their voice after my changes?

    Managing narrative distance and POV consistency

    Point of view isn't just about who tells the story. It's about how close readers feel to the character's thoughts and emotions. Consistent narrative distance keeps readers oriented and emotionally invested.

    Psychic distance levels. Think of POV as a camera with multiple zoom settings:

    Level 1 (Wide shot): "Sarah walked through the park."
    Level 2 (Medium shot): "Sarah enjoyed her walk through the park."
    Level 3 (Close-up): "Sarah breathed in the smell of fresh grass and felt her stress dissolve."
    Level 4 (Internal): "The grass smelled like childhood summers. Why had she waited so long to come here?"
    Level 5 (Deep internal): "Grass. Summer. Mom pushing her on the swing set before everything went wrong."

    Distance violations that kill immersion. Jumping between levels without reason confuses readers and weakens emotional impact.

    Problem example: "John entered the conference room. He was nervous about the presentation. The quarterly reports lay spread across the mahogany table like accusatory documents. Would he remember his opening line?"

    This paragraph ping-pongs between level 1 (objective), level 2 (summary), level 3 (interpretive), and level 4 (direct thought). Pick a level and stay there, or transition smoothly between levels.

    Better version: "John's hands shook as he entered the conference room. The quarterly reports lay spread across the mahogany table. Accusatory documents, each one highlighting his department's failures. Would he remember his opening line?" (Consistent level 3-4 throughout)

    Voice matching character and situation. The same character should sound different when calm versus panicked, alone versus in public, talking to their boss versus their best friend. But these variations should feel like the same person adapting to circumstances, not different people entirely.

    Example from romance editing. Heroine sounded identical whether she was bantering with friends or having an emotional breakdown. We adjusted her internal voice to match her emotional state while keeping her core personality consistent. Playful voice: "Great. Just great. Nothing said 'professional competence' quite like coffee stains on a first-date outfit." Vulnerable voice: "She stared at her reflection. When had trying so hard become who she was?"

    Dialogue that reveals character layers. What characters say, how they say it, and what they don't say all contribute to voice. Great editors help authors use dialogue to reveal subtext and internal conflict.

    Action step for POV consistency: Read each chapter and mark the narrative distance level in the margins. Look for jarring jumps between levels. Make sure distance changes serve the story's emotional needs.

    Hearing the language

    Silent reading misses half the problems in a manuscript. Rhythm, repetition, unintentional rhyme, awkward word combinations, tongue twisters, sentence fragments that don't work, run-on sentences that lose steam—your ear catches what your eye misses.

    Reading aloud reveals hidden problems. Try reading this paragraph normally: "She felt a sudden sensation of fear fear creeping through her consciousness as the dark shadows moved menacingly toward her trembling form."

    Now read it aloud. Your tongue stumbles over the repeated "fear fear," the alliteration "sudden sensation" and "shadows... menacingly" feels forced, and "trembling form" sounds like purple prose. Your ear immediately knows this needs work.

    Rhythm glitches that break flow. English has natural stress patterns. Fight them and your prose sounds stilted. Work with them and your writing sings.

    Accidental rhyme and echo. "The night was bright with artificial light" sounds like Dr. Seuss, not serious fiction. "She stood there staring, caring about nothing" repeats the -ing ending in a way that draws attention to itself.

    Word choice that creates music. Some combinations sound smooth together. Others create verbal speed bumps. "The crisp, sharp sound" flows better than "the sharp, crisp sound" because of how the consonants interact.

    Example from memoir editing. Author wrote: "My mother's meticulous methods of meal preparation made me marvel at her dedication." Read aloud, the repeated 'm' sounds create an unintentional alliterative effect that distracts from the emotional content. We changed it to: "My mother's careful meal preparation amazed me. Her dedication to feeding us well never wavered." Same meaning, better music.

    Repetition that works versus repetition that grates. Strategic repetition creates emphasis and rhythm. Accidental repetition annoys readers.

    Consistency Systems and Technical Toolset

    Great editors are organized editors. Your brain handles the creative work—spotting voice problems, improving flow, catching logic gaps. But consistency? That's a job for systems and tools. Trying to remember whether the character's name is "Katie" or "Katy" in chapter twelve while also thinking about pacing and dialogue is a recipe for mistakes.

    The solution isn't perfect memory. It's building systems that catch errors before they become embarrassing problems in the published book.

    Living style sheets that evolve with projects

    A style sheet isn't a static document you create once and forget. It's a living record of every editorial decision you make, updated throughout the project as new questions arise.

    Starting with the Chicago Manual of Style foundation. Chicago gives you the baseline for punctuation, capitalization, numbers, and citations. But every manuscript presents unique situations Chicago doesn't cover. Your style sheet captures those project-specific decisions.

    Core categories for any style sheet:

    Character names and descriptions: Not just spelling, but nicknames, ages, titles, relationships. "Dr. Elizabeth Montgomery, 45, cardiologist at St. Mary's Hospital. Called 'Liz' by family, 'Beth' by colleagues, 'Dr. Montgomery' by patients."

    Geographic and proper nouns: Real places, fictional locations, company names, brand names. Include correct spellings, capitalization preferences, and any special formatting.

    Technical terms and specialized vocabulary: Industry jargon, scientific terms, foreign phrases. Note definitions, preferred spellings, and whether to italicize.

    Numbers and measurements: Spell out numbers under ten? Use numerals for ages? How do you handle percentages, currencies, and technical measurements?

    Punctuation preferences: Serial comma yes or no? How do you handle dialogue within dialogue? Em dashes or en dashes for interruptions?

    Timeline and continuity notes: Character ages, dates of events, seasonal references, technology available in the story's timeframe.

    Real example from a historical fiction project. The author kept switching between "World War II," "WWII," and "the Second World War." Without a style sheet decision, different editors on the project made different changes, creating an inconsistent final manuscript. The style sheet established "World War II" on first reference, "the war" thereafter, with "WWII" only in dialogue when natural.

    Growing the style sheet during editing. Start with basic categories and add entries as you encounter decisions. When you change "healthcare" to "health care," add it to the sheet. When you decide to capitalize "Detective" as a title, record the rule.

    This prevents you from making opposite decisions later in the manuscript. Nothing looks more unprofessional than a book that treats the same word differently on different pages.

    Digital templates that save time. Create a master style sheet template with standard categories and Chicago Manual defaults. Copy it for each new project and customize as needed. This prevents starting from scratch every time and ensures you don't forget important categories.

    Tools that catch what humans miss

    Your eyes glaze over by page fifty. Your attention wanders during repetitive copyediting. Technology doesn't have these problems. Smart editors use tools to handle routine consistency checks while they focus on higher-level issues.

    Track Changes for transparent editing. Every edit you make should be visible to the author. Track Changes in Word creates a clear record of what changed and when. But use it strategically.

    Turn on Track Changes for all content edits. Line edits, word changes, sentence restructuring—everything that affects meaning or style should be tracked.

    Accept formatting changes immediately. Don't clutter the document with tracked paragraph spacing or font changes. The author needs to see content edits, not technical cleanup.

    Use comments for explanations. When you make a significant change, explain why in a comment. "Changed to maintain consistent POV" or "Parallel structure for clarity" helps authors understand your reasoning.

    Word styles for consistent formatting. Styles ensure every heading, subheading, and body paragraph looks identical throughout the manuscript. They also make global formatting changes instant instead of page-by-page nightmares.

    Set up paragraph styles for:

    • Chapter titles
    • Subheadings (multiple levels if needed)
    • Body text
    • Indented quotes
    • Bulleted lists
    • Caption text

    Character styles for:

    • Emphasis (instead of manual italics)
    • Foreign words
    • Book titles
    • Technical terms

    PerfectIt for automated consistency scanning. This Word add-in catches inconsistencies human editors typically miss. It flags hyphenation variations ("email" versus "e-mail"), capitalization inconsistencies ("Board of Directors" versus "board of directors"), and spacing problems.

    PerfectIt catches:

    • Different spellings of the same word throughout the document
    • Inconsistent capitalization of proper nouns
    • Missing periods after abbreviations
    • Inconsistent quote mark styles
    • Numbers that should be written out versus numerals

    Run PerfectIt before you start editing to catch obvious problems, then again after copyediting to verify your changes stayed consistent.

    Macros and regex for advanced find-and-replace. Beyond basic search-and-replace, advanced tools let you make complex global changes safely.

    Regex (regular expressions) examples:

    • Find all instances of three or more spaces in a row
    • Locate sentences that start with "And" or "But" (if the author overuses these)
    • Find inconsistent dialogue punctuation patterns
    • Identify all instances of passive voice construction

    Word macros for repetitive tasks:

    • Remove extra line breaks between paragraphs
    • Convert straight quotes to curly quotes throughout
    • Apply consistent formatting to email addresses or website URLs
    • Insert non-breaking spaces before units of measurement

    Warning about automation: Always review automated changes before accepting them. Tools make mistakes, especially with context-dependent decisions. The goal is to flag potential problems, not replace editorial judgment.

    Continuity logs that prevent plot holes

    Fiction manuscripts are full of moving parts. Characters age, seasons change, technology evolves, relationships shift. Your job is catching contradictions before readers do.

    Timeline spreadsheets for chronological accuracy. Create a simple table with columns for date, event, character ages, and notes. Update it as you edit.

    Sample timeline entry:

    • Date: March 15, 2019
    • Event: Sarah starts new job
    • Sarah's age: 28
    • Notes: Mentions iPhone 8, spring weather, references to Trump presidency

    This catches problems like characters aging inconsistently, technology that didn't exist yet, or seasonal references that don't match the timeline.

    Character tracking for development consistency. Each major character needs a profile that grows

    Communication, Coaching, and Negotiation

    Editing is a people job. You work on pages, you work with a person. The quality of that conversation shapes the book.

    Ask questions that get to intent

    A weak query fixes commas. A strong query finds purpose.

    Try this shift.

    • Weak: “Comma splice here. Split the sentence?”
    • Strong: “The rush here feels deliberate. Do you want breathless or measured? If breathless, I will keep the run-on rhythm and adjust punctuation for flow. If measured, I will split into two beats.”

    You are not nitpicking. You are testing intent. A few prompts that save drafts:

    • “What do you want the reader to feel at this moment?”
    • “Who knows what in this scene, and when?”
    • “Is the confusion here meant for the character or for the reader?”
    • “Is this term precise for your field, or is there a better one your audience trusts?”
    • “Do we want the narrator’s judgment here, or only observation?”

    Always give the why. A short note does it.

    • “Trimmed internal monologue to keep tension on the ticking clock.”
    • “Swapped order of these two paragraphs to keep the reveal on the page turn.”
    • “Standardized ‘clients’ over ‘customers’ to match industry usage in the comps.”

    Two quick examples.

    • Fiction: The scene sags. You write, “Stakes feel muted. If Ella risks the job offer here, tension rises. Option: have the boss call during the argument. If you want quiet dread instead, I will prune action beats and lean on subtext.”
    • Nonfiction: A claim feels bold. You write, “Do you intend to state this as settled fact? If so, source needed. If not, hedging language and a footnote will protect authority.”

    Notice the pattern. Diagnose intent, then propose a path.

    Coach, do not control

    Your edits should teach. Not take over.

    Offer a model, then step back. Label options. Invite the author to choose or beat them.

    Original:

    “Given the aforementioned circumstances, I proceeded to embark upon a comprehensive review of the documents, which were numerous.”

    Option A, clean and neutral:

    “I reviewed the documents in full.”

    Option B, voice with mild swagger:

    “I went through every page.”

    Option C, time pressure:

    “I tore through the files.”

    Then ask, “Which register fits your narrator and audience?” Add the why if needed. “A keeps things formal. B keeps voice without fluff. C adds urgency.”

    Another pattern that helps:

    • Describe the issue in plain terms. “Long lead-in buries the action.”
    • Name the effect. “Reader waits for the verb.”
    • Offer two or three fixes. “Cut the throat-clearing. Move the verb forward. Or break into two sentences and add a concrete detail.”
    • Invite a better fix. “If you like another route, take it. I will align the rest.”

    Respect builds trust. Trust gets real revision, not grudging tweaks.

    Set boundaries that protect the work

    Kind boundaries keep projects sane. Scope, schedule, change rules. Put them in writing before you touch a line.

    Define scope with numbers, not vibes.

    • Passes included: one developmental pass, one line edit, one proof review of specified pages.
    • Word count cap and format standards.
    • What falls outside scope: new chapters, new research sections, major structural changes after line edit, image sourcing, indexing.

    Define timing.

    • Response windows for queries. For example, editor responds within two business days, author within five.
    • Turnaround per pass. State dates, not “soon.”
    • Meeting length and purpose. “One kickoff call, 45 minutes. One revision call, 30 minutes.”

    Define change orders.

    • “New scenes after line edit move the project back to a structural phase. New fee and timeline apply.”
    • “If the manuscript grows by more than ten percent, fee and schedule will be revisited.”
    • “Rush requests affect quality risk. I will flag any risk in writing before accepting.”

    Say it warmly, not stiffly.

    • “I want your book to land strong. To do that, we need firm edges on the work. Here is what I will do, here is what falls outside, and here is how we handle surprises.”

    When scope creep shows up, use this script.

    • “I see three new chapters. That is exciting progress. This shifts the level of edit back to structure. I can fold them in under a change order. Here are two options with dates and costs. Tell me which path serves your goals.”

    Clear beats nice. Clear is kind.

    Collaboration protocol: a simple pact

    Agree on how you will work together before you begin. A short pact removes friction and saves days.

    What to include:

    • Query log format. A shared spreadsheet or doc with columns: ID, location, issue, intent question, editor suggestion, author decision, notes, owner, due date.
    • Response times. “Editor replies within 48 hours on business days. Author replies within five business days. Urgent items by phone.”
    • File naming. “ProjectName_Author_YYYYMMDD_v1.docx. Editor returns files with _EDrev1. Final files marked _FINAL.”
    • Version control. “Only the newest dated file is live. No parallel edits.”
    • Communication channels. “Email for files, log for queries, one scheduled call per pass. No edits in chat.”
    • Tone brief. “Audience, goal, sensitivities, off-limits topics, brand terms, preferred pronouns, regional spelling. Three comp titles for voice calibration.”
    • Permissions. “Pull quotes or images require sources and permissions. Author supplies proof.”
    • Escalation. “If a query sits unresolved past the due date, editor will choose a conservative option and mark it for final review.”

    Mini exercise for your next project:

    • Draft a one-page pact using the bullets above.
    • Add two sample queries in your chosen log format.
    • Write three sentences that state your boundary rules in friendly language.
    • Send the pact with your kickoff email.

    A last note. The goal is not winning an argument. The goal is a strong book and a steady author. Your questions, your models, and your boundaries make that possible.

    Workflow, Production Literacy, and Risk Management

    Great editors think past the manuscript. They see the finished book, the production pipeline, and the places things go wrong. This forward vision saves weeks and prevents disasters.

    Edit with the downstream in mind

    Every edit ripples forward. Change a chapter title after typesetting, and you break the table of contents, running heads, and cross-references. Move a paragraph after layout, and you create widows and orphans. Add a sentence during proofing, and you reflow pages and mess up the index.

    The editorial sequence exists for a reason: developmental, line, copy, typesetting, proof. Each pass gets more expensive to undo.

    Developmental editing shapes the big structure. Move chapters, cut scenes, change POV. Do the heavy surgery here. Line editing polishes voice and flow within stable content. Copyediting fixes grammar, style, and consistency. Once typesetting begins, changes cost time and money.

    A few practical guidelines:

    • Lock developmental changes before line editing begins. “Structure is final” means structure is final.
    • Lock content changes before copyediting begins. No new paragraphs, no deleted sections.
    • During typesetting, limit changes to essential fixes: factual errors, legal concerns, truly broken sentences.
    • During proofing, change only clear errors: typos, wrong fonts, missing punctuation.

    One client learned this the hard way. After seeing typeset pages, she wanted to expand three scenes and trim two chapters. Total rewrite. The book missed its launch date by six weeks, and the production costs doubled.

    Set expectations upfront. “We get three passes to make this book sing. The first pass moves big pieces. The second pass fine-tunes the language. The third pass catches the details. After that, changes need compelling reasons and budget approval.”

    Anticipate production headaches

    Books are physical objects with physical constraints. Good editors know where layout breaks and plan around trouble.

    Widows and orphans plague every typesetter. A widow leaves a single line dangling at the top of a page. An orphan strands a single line at the bottom. Both look unprofessional. You prevent them by writing with layout in mind.

    • Avoid paragraphs that run exactly one line over onto the next page.
    • Keep subheads with at least two lines of following text.
    • Check that chapter endings leave enough text to balance the page.

    Cross-references create maintenance nightmares. “See Chapter 7” becomes wrong when you move content. “As we discussed on page 43” breaks when typesetting changes page numbers.

    Better approach: use dynamic references. “See the discussion of X in Chapter 7” stays accurate if you rename the chapter. “As discussed earlier” works regardless of page flow.

    Art placement takes planning. Photos, charts, and pull quotes need space and context. The designer wants to place a photo near its first mention, but sometimes the text does not leave room. Plan for this during content editing.

    • Group related images when you write captions.
    • Write flexible references: “The chart below shows” works better than “Figure 3.2 shows.”
    • Leave breathing room around art callouts.

    Index dependencies trip up nonfiction authors. You write about “cognitive bias” on pages 23, 87, 145, and 203. The indexer creates the entry. Then you decide to change the term to “mental shortcuts” on page 87. Now the index needs updating, cross-references need checking, and the glossary needs revision.

    Track terminology from the start. Keep a running list of key terms, concepts, and names. Flag changes that affect indexing. Update the list as you edit.

    Risk mitigation saves careers

    Some editorial mistakes create legal exposure, ethical problems, or business disasters. Smart editors flag risks early and escalate to specialists.

    Permissions protect everyone. Using someone else’s words, photos, or data without permission invites lawsuits. The author thinks their quote falls under fair use. The publisher’s legal team disagrees. The book gets pulled from shelves.

    Build a permissions log from day one. Track every quote over a few lines, every image, every chart adapted from another source. Note the source, usage, and permission status. Flag questionable items for legal review.

    Libel and defamation hide in memoir, business books, and narrative nonfiction. An author writes about a former business partner who “stole clients and lied to investors.” True or not, those words create legal risk. The partner sues for defamation. The publisher faces legal bills.

    Watch for specific accusations about living people. Names, places, and verifiable claims need fact-checking or legal review. Consider pseudonyms for minor characters. Add disclaimers when appropriate.

    Inclusivity and sensitivity affect reputation and sales. Language that feels normal to the author might alienate readers or create controversy. A business book with only male examples. A health guide that assumes everyone has insurance. A memoir with outdated terms for disability or identity.

    Run inclusivity checks during content editing, not after layout. Look for:

    • Representation in examples, case studies, and hypotheticals.
    • Language around identity, disability, mental health, and socioeconomic status.
    • Cultural references that assume specific backgrounds or experiences.
    • Gendered language in professional contexts.

    Consider hiring sensitivity readers for books that touch identity, trauma, or cultural topics outside the author’s experience.

    Metadata accuracy sounds boring but affects discoverability and sales. Wrong BISAC codes put the book in the wrong section of bookstores. Missing keywords hurt online search. Incorrect ISBNs create distribution problems.

    Double-check the basics: title, subtitle, author name spelling, publication date, page count, trim size, BISAC categories, keywords, and book description. Verify the copyright page matches the metadata. Flag discrepancies for the production team.

    Build your editorial calendar and risk register

    A calendar keeps projects on track. A risk register keeps problems visible.

    Start each project with an editorial calendar. Include:

    • Manuscript delivery date and word count.
    • Editorial passes with start dates, durations, and deliverables.
    • Author review windows and feedback deadlines.
    • Production milestones: typesetting, proof pages, final files.
    • Launch date and any marketing deadlines.

    Sample timeline for a 300-page business book:

    • Week 1-2: Developmental edit (editor)
    • Week 3-4: Author revisions
    • Week 5: Line edit (editor)
    • Week 6: Author review and final changes
    • Week 7: Copyedit and fact-check
    • Week 8: Author review of copyedits
    • Week 9-10: Typesetting and design
    • Week 11: Proofread
    • Week 12: Final corrections and print files
    • Week 13: Launch

    Adjust for complexity, author availability, and seasonal constraints.

    Your risk register tracks potential problems and assigns owners. Create a simple spreadsheet with columns for risk description, likelihood, impact, mitigation plan, owner, and status.

    Sample entries:

    • “Chapter 4 contains unverified claims about competitor practices. High likelihood of fact-check issues. Plan: flag for legal review by Week 6. Owner: Editor.”
    • “Author mentions using copyrighted song lyrics in three chapter openings. Medium likelihood of permission denial. Plan: request permissions by Week 3, prepare alternatives. Owner: Author.”
    • “Book references current tax law that expires December 2024. Low likelihood of publication delay, but high impact if book launches after law changes. Plan: add disclaimer and update language by Week 8. Owner: Author.”

    Review the register weekly. Escalate high-risk items to the publisher, legal team, or other specialists. Update status and add new risks as they emerge.

    The goal is no surprises. When you think downstream and plan for problems, books launch on time and within budget. When you ignore production and risk, you get crisis management and blame games.

    Start with your next project. Create the calendar, build the risk register, and think like a publisher. The book will thank you.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How do editors read like both an ideal reader and an acquisitions editor?

    Good editors switch between two mindsets: the cold first-read of your ideal reader (checking whether the book delivers its genre promise) and the acquisitions perspective (assessing commercial viability, target audience and market fit). Both viewpoints catch different problems—reader-facing pacing or payoff issues versus whether the manuscript can be positioned and sold.

    Practically, editors run quick checks for genre expectations, voice distinctiveness, pacing and word count, then test comparison titles and market timing to see if the book will find readers and a publisher. That dual reading informs concrete edit choices.

    What should I include in a one-page reader and market profile?

    Keep it concise: demographics (age, lifestyle), reading habits and discovery methods, subgenre and trope preferences, key pain points your book addresses, and the emotional drivers you want to provoke. Add three comparison titles that capture tone, pacing and length so everyone shares the same market reference.

    This one-page reader and market profile becomes your editorial north star—use it before structural edits so every change supports reader expectations and clear market positioning.

    What is diagnostic thinking and how do editors triage edits by impact and cost?

    Diagnostic thinking means tracing surface symptoms (boring scenes, confusing plot) to root causes (unclear stakes, passive protagonist, missing cause-and-effect). Rather than treating every issue in isolation, great editors identify patterns and fix the underlying structural problem so many surface issues resolve at once.

    Triage ranks fixes by impact and cost: prioritise high-impact, low-cost changes (clarify stakes, cut redundancy) before high-cost rewrites (POV changes, massive restructure). Follow the revision hierarchy—structure before style—so effort yields maximum benefit.

    How can I protect author voice while improving clarity at line level?

    Start by distinguishing voice from unclear prose: preserve rhythm and distinctive diction while removing ambiguity or awkward phrasing. Use cadence adjustments (break long sentences at natural pauses, add connective tissue for staccato prose) and always ask whether a change still sounds like the author.

    Reading aloud, offering multiple edit options, and explaining trade-offs helps authors choose edits that retain their voice. The aim is "protecting voice while elevating clarity"—not replacing it.

    What is a living style sheet and why should every project have one?

    A living style sheet records project-specific editorial decisions (character names and spellings, technical terms, punctuation preferences, number rules, timeline notes) and evolves as new issues arise. It prevents inconsistent treatments—like switching between "World War II" and "WWII"—across the manuscript.

    Start from a Chicago Manual baseline, add core categories, and update the sheet during edits. Use it with tools like PerfectIt and Track Changes to keep the manuscript consistent and production-ready.

    How do authors and editors set boundaries to avoid scope creep and delays?

    Create a short collaboration pact that defines scope (passes included, word-count cap), timelines (response windows, pass durations), change-order rules (fees if structure changes after a pass), and communication channels. Put these terms in writing before work begins so expectations are clear and kind.

    Use a simple query log and version-controlled file names, and agree who owns unresolved decisions after deadlines. Clear rules are not rigidness; they're the framework that protects both the book and the working relationship.

    What practical steps do editors take to manage production risks after typesetting?

    Edit with the downstream in mind: lock developmental changes before line edits, limit changes during typesetting to essential fixes, and run a permissions log and fact-checks early. Small late-stage edits can cascade into layout, index and legal problems, so schedule and governance are key.

    Build an editorial calendar and risk register to track potential issues (copyright clearances, libel risks, metadata accuracy). Review the register weekly and escalate high-risk items to legal or production rather than improvising fixes at the last minute.

    Writing Manual Cover

    Download FREE ebook

    Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

    'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent
    Get free book