Why Editing Prices Vary So Much Between Editors
Table of Contents
What Actually Affects an Editing Quote
Editors do math, not magic. A quote reflects hours, risk, and where your manuscript sits on the editing spectrum. You influence all three.
Level of edit sets the tier
Developmental editing goes deep on structure, argument, plot, and pacing. Expect margin questions, an editorial letter, and a revision roadmap. More analysis, more hours, higher price.
Line editing sharpens voice and flow. Sentence by sentence, word choice by word choice. Slower than copyediting because decisions stack up.
Copyediting fixes grammar, usage, clarity, and consistency. Faster than line work, but still attentive.
Proofreading catches typos after layout or a final copyedit. Quickest tier and usually the least expensive.
Not sure which level fits? Try this mini-test:
- Read the first chapter aloud. If you keep stopping to rethink scenes or beats, you need developmental help first.
- Read a random middle page silently. If meaning feels fine but sentences feel bumpy, line editing suits.
- Run a spellcheck, then print two pages. If errors jump out in punctuation or spacing, copyediting or a proof pass will help.
Pick one primary need. Blending levels muddies quotes and timelines.
Word count and complexity drive hours
More words equals more hours. Complexity shifts hours even more.
Common complexity factors:
- Heavy revisions or uneven quality across chapters
- Citations, footnotes, tables, figures, and appendices
- Reference styles such as APA, MLA, or Chicago notes and bibliography
- Technical or academic terminology
- Multilingual text, code-switching, diacritics, and non-Latin scripts
- Dialogue-heavy scenes with unique dialect or invented languages
- Extensive worldbuilding lore and timelines
Two 80,000-word manuscripts rarely price the same. A clean genre novel with consistent style moves along. An academic monograph with 600 references and tables needs verification, cross-checks, and style alignment. Expect a higher quote for the second.
If you trimmed 20,000 words last week, mention this. Fresh cuts leave rough seams. Editors factor smoothing time into the estimate.
Turnaround time changes rates
Short timelines raise prices. A rush slot means reshuffled schedules, evening work, or weekend hours. Most editors add a surcharge for this, often 25 to 50 percent, sometimes more for extreme deadlines.
A simple example:
- 90,000 words over eight weeks, standard rate
- 90,000 words over three weeks, rush rate
State your deadline upfront. Surprises lead to higher fees or a no.
Format and readiness matter
Clean files save money. Messy ones cost money.
Helpful prep moves:
- Use standard fonts, double spacing, and one space after periods
- Keep one file, not scattered chapters in separate docs
- Remove manual tabs and extra returns
- Apply real styles for headers and subheads
- Label images and tables clearly
- Supply citation guidelines and sample references
These basics reduce friction. Editors quote for editing, not file triage.
What to send for an accurate quote
Give enough detail to let an editor estimate hours with confidence. Aim for clarity, not salesmanship.
Include:
- Level of edit sought, one primary level
- Exact word count from your current file
- Genre and audience
- A one-paragraph synopsis or purpose statement
- Top three concerns, for example pacing, voice, point of view
- Sample pages, 1,000 to 3,000 words from the middle, include a tricky section
- Style needs, for example Chicago, APA, British or American spelling, house style
- Special elements, footnotes, references, images, sidebars, code blocks, multilingual content
- Deadline and any blackout dates
- Preferred deliverables, number of passes, editorial letter, style sheet, calls
- Your time zone and communication preferences
Template you can paste into an email:
- Book title and genre:
- Level of edit requested:
- Word count:
- Audience and comparable titles:
- Pain points:
- Style or formatting requirements:
- Special content or citations:
- Deadline:
- Deliverables expected:
- Sample pages attached, yes:
- Budget range, if relevant:
One more tip. Send the hardest chapter for the sample, not the polished prologue. A realistic sample leads to a realistic quote.
Quick pricing sense check
- Higher depth, higher rate. Developmental tops the scale, then line, then copyedit, then proofread.
- Longer manuscripts cost more, but complexity shapes totals even more.
- Faster timelines raise rates.
Clear inputs lead to clean quotes. Give precise details, pick the right level, and share a representative sample. You get a fair price and a smoother edit.
Editor Variables That Influence Price
Not all editors price the same because not all editors are the same. Experience, expertise, and business realities create different value propositions. Here's what moves the needle on rates.
Experience and specialization command premiums
A generalist editor charges one rate. A specialist who knows your genre inside and out charges another.
Take romance editing. An experienced romance editor knows trope expectations, heat level conventions, and what drives readers to one-star reviews. They spot pacing issues in the black moment, flag consent problems, and understand series bible consistency. Worth the premium? Most romance authors say yes.
Academic editors live in citation hell so you don't have to. They know APA 7th edition updates, handle dissertation committees, and format reference lists without breaking. A generalist editor learning Chicago notes-bibliography style on your dime costs more in the long run.
Bestseller credits matter too. An editor who worked on a New York Times list title brings proven market instincts. They've seen what works at scale. Publishers notice this track record. Authors pay for it.
Years in the business correlate with higher rates, but specialization trumps general experience every time. Ten years editing romance beats twenty years editing everything.
Business models create different overhead structures
Solo freelancer versus editing agency. Both deliver quality, but overhead shapes pricing.
Solo freelancers set rates to cover:
- Healthcare and benefits
- Business insurance and legal costs
- Office space and equipment
- Professional development and memberships
- Marketing and client acquisition
- Feast-or-famine income gaps
Agencies factor in:
- Employee salaries and benefits
- Office leases and utilities
- Project management layers
- Quality control systems
- Account management time
- Profit margins for shareholders
Neither model is better or worse. Agencies offer consistency and backup coverage. Freelancers offer direct relationships and flexibility. Both price to stay viable.
Location affects bottom lines
Cost of living varies dramatically. An editor in rural Kansas prices differently than one in Manhattan or London. Same skill, different rent.
Currency fluctuations matter too. A UK editor quoting in pounds faces exchange rate risks with US clients. Some pass this along in pricing.
Tax structures shift net income. European editors dealing with VAT, Canadian editors with GST, and US editors with self-employment taxes all factor these into sustainable rates.
Don't assume cheaper geography means lower quality. Sometimes you're just benefiting from favorable economics.
Demand and capacity drive market rates
Popular editors book out months ahead. Scarcity creates pricing power.
Award-winning editors or those featured in major publications see inquiry spikes. More demand, higher rates.
Editors launching new specializations might price lower to build portfolios. Those pivoting from high-demand niches to experimental ones might offer transition rates.
Seasonal patterns matter too. Academic editors surge in summer when thesis defenses cluster. Fiction editors see spikes around NaNoWriMo. Smart editors price according to their booking waves.
What this means for your wallet
Newer editors with lighter portfolios cost less upfront but might need more revision rounds. Seasoned specialists cost more per hour but often work faster and catch issues generalists miss.
A developmental editor who's worked on fifty fantasy novels spots pacing problems on page one. A smart generalist might need three chapters to identify the same issue. The specialist charges more per hour but saves you time and rounds.
Red flags that justify walking away
Beware editors who:
- Claim expertise in every genre
- Have no verifiable client testimonials
- Offer rates far below market averages
- Promise unrealistic timelines
- Avoid providing sample edits
- Use vague language about deliverables
Green flags worth paying for
Look for editors who:
- Show deep knowledge of your specific genre
- Offer client references you can contact
- Provide transparent rate structures
- Demonstrate clear communication styles
- Share relevant professional credentials
- Give realistic timeline estimates
Making the assessment
Price shopping by rate alone misses the point. A $500 copyedit that needs major revisions costs more than an $800 one that nails it the first time.
Ask these questions:
- How many books in my genre have you edited?
- What's your typical revision rate for authors at my level?
- Which recent projects are most similar to mine?
- How do you handle scope changes or extra rounds?
- What's included in your standard package?
Request work samples that match your genre and edit level. A literary fiction sample tells you nothing about paranormal romance skills.
Check testimonials, but dig deeper than five-star ratings. Look for specific mentions of genre knowledge, communication style, and results. Generic praise like "great editor" means less than "caught my werewolf mythology inconsistencies."
The fit versus fee balance
The right editor for your project might not be the cheapest or most expensive. Focus on value alignment:
- Do they understand your target audience?
- Have they worked with authors at your career stage?
- Does their communication style match your preferences?
- Are their sample edits the type of feedback you need?
A perfect genre match who costs 20 percent more often delivers better results than a cheaper generalist. But a skilled generalist who communicates well beats an expensive specialist who doesn't get your vision.
Your editor becomes a partner in your book's success. Choose based on partnership potential, not just price points.
Pricing Models Explained (and How to Compare Quotes)
Editors structure their fees in different ways, and the model matters more than you think. Each approach handles risk, scope, and payment differently. Understanding these structures helps you compare quotes fairly and avoid surprises.
Per-word pricing: the industry standard
Most editors quote per-word rates because word count stays constant. You know the total upfront. No surprises when the work takes longer than expected.
Typical ranges:
- Developmental editing: $0.08-$0.20 per word
- Line editing: $0.05-$0.15 per word
- Copyediting: $0.02-$0.08 per word
- Proofreading: $0.01-$0.04 per word
But word count tells only part of the story. Dense academic text takes longer than dialogue-heavy fiction. A mystery with complex timelines needs more attention than straightforward literary fiction. Good editors factor this into their per-word rates or adjust quotes after seeing samples.
Per-word works best when manuscripts are clean and the edit level is clear. It falls short with heavily revised drafts or projects needing extensive restructuring.
Per-hour rates: when scope gets murky
Editors choose hourly rates for unpredictable projects. Manuscripts needing major surgery. Academic papers with citation nightmares. Books where the author wants extensive coaching.
Hourly rates range from $40-$150, depending on experience and specialization. The editor estimates total hours and provides a range: "This will take 20-30 hours at $75/hour, so $1,500-$2,250."
The risk shifts to you. If the manuscript needs more work than expected, the bill grows. Some editors cap hours to protect clients. Others require approval before exceeding estimates.
Hourly pricing works when you trust the editor's judgment and timeline estimates. It fails when communication breaks down or scope creep runs wild.
Per-page rates: the academic favorite
Academic editors often quote per page because formatting varies wildly. A dense philosophy paper differs from a poetry thesis. Pages provide a visual reference both parties understand.
Standard academic page = 250 words, double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman. Business documents use different page calculations.
Per-page rates translate roughly:
- $3-8 per page for copyediting
- $5-15 per page for substantive editing
- $8-20 per page for developmental work
Watch the definition. Some editors count manuscript pages. Others count final formatted pages. Big difference for your budget.
Flat fees: the boutique approach
Experienced editors sometimes quote project totals after reviewing the manuscript. They absorb the risk of overruns in exchange for premium pricing.
Flat fees work when editors know their speed and the project scope is clear. They fail when clients change requirements midstream or manuscripts hide major problems.
Expect flat fees 10-20 percent higher than equivalent per-word quotes. You're paying for predictability and the editor's risk absorption.
Tiered packages: the agency model
Some editors offer service levels:
- Basic: copyedit only
- Standard: copyedit plus style sheet
- Premium: copyedit, style sheet, editorial letter, and revision call
Packages bundle services for convenience but reduce flexibility. You might pay for services you don't need or miss ones you want.
Compare package contents carefully. A "premium" package from one editor might offer less than another's "standard" service.
Retainer arrangements: the partnership model
High-end editors working with repeat clients sometimes use retainers. You pay monthly for priority access and guaranteed availability.
Retainers work for authors with multiple projects or ongoing series. They fail for one-off manuscripts or authors unsure about future needs.
Hidden variables that explode budgets
The quote you see isn't always the total you pay. Watch for:
Minimum fees: Many editors require minimums regardless of word count. A 500-word short story might cost the same as a 2,000-word piece.
Rush charges: Need it in two weeks instead of four? Expect 25-50 percent surcharges.
Extra revision rounds: The quote includes one edit pass. Additional rounds cost extra, often at hourly rates.
Project management time: Scheduling calls, tracking changes, and coordinating with other professionals adds billable hours.
Meeting and consultation time: Some editors include brief check-ins. Others charge for every phone call.
File format issues: Poorly formatted manuscripts require cleanup time. Some editors bill this separately.
Scope creep: Adding beta reader feedback, changing edit levels mid-project, or requesting new services triggers additional charges.
Converting quotes for fair comparison
You receive three quotes:
- Editor A: $0.06 per word for 80,000 words = $4,800
- Editor B: $65/hour, estimated 60-80 hours = $3,900-$5,200
- Editor C: Flat fee of $5,500
Convert everything to effective per-word rates:
- Editor A: $0.06/word
- Editor B: $0.049-$0.065/word (using hour range)
- Editor C: $0.069/word
But rates tell only part of the story. Check what's included:
- How many revision rounds?
- Editorial letter length and depth?
- Style sheet included?
- Meeting time provided?
- Rush charges if timeline changes?
Questions that clarify true costs
Before accepting any quote, ask:
What's included in the base price?
Get specifics about deliverables, revision rounds, and communication.
How do you handle scope changes?
What happens if you want developmental feedback during copyediting? Or if the manuscript needs more work than expected?
What triggers additional charges?
Rush work, extra rounds, formatting cleanup, phone calls?
How do you track and bill time?
For hourly projects, understand their time-tracking methods and billing increments.
What's your payment schedule?
Half upfront, remainder on delivery? Monthly invoicing? Payment terms affect cash flow.
How do you define project completion?
When is the work finished? After your review? After implementing feedback?
Red flags in pricing models
Beware editors who:
- Refuse to provide written quotes
- Use vague language about scope
- Don't specify what triggers extra charges
- Offer rates far below market standards
- Demand full payment upfront
- Won't estimate total costs for hourly projects
Making the smart choice
The best pricing model matches your project needs and risk tolerance:
- Choose per-word for straightforward projects with clear scope
- Choose hourly for complex manuscripts needing extensive work
- Choose flat fees when you want budget certainty and trust the editor
- Choose packages when you need multiple services and want convenience
Don't pick the cheapest option automatically. A $0.03/word copyedit that misses major issues costs more than a $0.06/word edit that nails it perfectly.
Focus on total value: quality of work, included services, communication style, and revision policies. The right editor at a fair price beats a cheap editor who delivers poor results.
Request written scope agreements regardless of pricing model. Clear expectations prevent disputes and surprise charges. Good editors welcome detailed discussions about scope and pricing. Great editors insist on them.
What You’re Paying For: Deliverables and Depth
Editing is not one service. It is a set of decisions, passes, and tools, bundled in different ways. The quote reflects what your editor promises to deliver and how deep they plan to go. You do not pay only for hours. You pay for quality of attention.
Margin comments vs in-line edits
These sound similar, but they serve different jobs.
- In-line edits live in the text with tracked changes. Word choice, sentence rhythm, grammar, clarity. Think of this as the polish.
- Margin comments sit in the bubbles. Why a scene drags. Where a character motivation slips. Notes on pacing, theme, or gaps in logic. This is coaching in context.
Some quotes include both. Some include only margin notes with light fixes. Ask where the editor will intervene and where they will offer guidance.
Mini exercise: open a page of your draft. Circle three sentences you would change outright. Now mark three spots where the issue is bigger than a sentence. Those second marks belong in the margins, not in-line.
The editorial letter
This is the big-picture report. Length ranges from two pages to thirty. A good letter covers:
- Structure. Openings, midpoint, ending, and scene order.
- Character and POV. Consistency, goals, and voice.
- Pacing and tension. Where momentum drops.
- Theme and promise. What the book says and whether the draft delivers.
- Next steps. A clear plan for revision.
Some editors include a short memo with high-level notes. Others deliver a deep diagnostic with examples and a revision roadmap. Longer is not always better. Look for clarity and a plan that makes you eager to get back to the keys.
The style sheet
This is your book’s rulebook. It saves you money across rounds and protects consistency. Expect entries for:
- Spelling choices. Email vs e-mail. Toward vs towards.
- Hyphenation. Decision-making or decision making.
- Numbers. Ten vs 10. Dates. Time.
- Capitalization. Magic systems, ranks, terms of art.
- Character and place names. Ages, traits, relationships.
- Voice notes. Formality level, slang, regional terms.
A solid style sheet travels with your book to the proofreader. It keeps everyone aligned. If a quote skips it, you pay in rework later.
A final proof pass
Not every package includes a last look. A proof pass catches typos that sneak in during revisions and layout. On books, this often happens after typesetting. On shorter work, it follows the edit. If quality matters, budget for a true proof pass by fresh eyes or at least a separate sweep by the same editor with a time buffer.
Tools and standards that raise quality
Standards and tools reduce error and save hours.
- Chicago Manual of Style. The default for most trade books. Editors who follow it deliver consistent punctuation, capitalization, and citation handling.
- PerfectIt and macros. These tools flag mismatches, inconsistent hyphenation, and style drift. They do not think for the editor, but they catch what humans miss after long days.
- Word styles and track changes. Proper use keeps your document clean and easy to review.
- Genre conventions. Romance beats, mystery clue placement, SFF worldbuilding sanity. An editor fluent in your genre steers choices that meet reader expectations.
Ask which standard guides and tools your editor uses. You deserve open processes, not guesswork.
Coaching vs correction
Some editors fix. Others teach while they fix. You see the difference in the deliverables.
Correction-focused work includes:
- In-line edits to tighten prose.
- Copyedits for grammar, usage, and consistency.
- A brief note with patterns to watch.
Coaching adds:
- A strategy call to set goals.
- Market positioning. Where your book fits and what comps suggest.
- A revision roadmap tied to your strengths and weak spots.
- Follow-up support after you revise.
Both paths have value. Choose based on where your draft sits. If you know the story works and the prose needs refinement, correction first. If you feel lost on structure or audience, coaching saves rounds and money.
A simple scenario to show depth
Two quotes for an 80,000-word novel arrive.
- Quote 1 includes a line edit only. Tracked changes. Light margin notes. No style sheet. No call. One pass. Timeline four weeks.
- Quote 2 includes a heavy line edit. A 6 to 10 page editorial letter on recurring issues in voice and pacing. A custom style sheet. One hour call. One follow-up hour after you review. Two passes. Timeline six to eight weeks.
Quote 2 costs more per word. It also reduces risk of a messy second round and helps you learn how to avoid the same issues in the next book. Cost vs value starts to look different.
What to ask for before you sign
Get a written list of deliverables. Specifics beat assumptions.
- Sample edit length and what level it reflects.
- Number of passes and which levels those cover.
- Editorial letter length or an outline of topics.
- Style sheet included or not.
- Meeting time included. Format of meetings.
- File formats. .docx with tracked changes, PDF for proof marks, or both.
- Timeline with milestones.
- How comments and queries arrive. Margin notes, summary emails, or calls.
- What happens after delivery. One week of email support or paid consult hours.
One more step. Ask how the editor defines done. For example, done after one pass and delivery. Or done after you send a list of follow-up questions within a set window.
Depth is a choice. When you know what each deliverable means, you choose with your eyes open. That is how you pay once and feel good about it.
Getting Accurate, Fair Quotes
You get fair quotes by giving editors what they need to price the work with confidence. Editors guess when briefs are thin. Guessing inflates estimates and slows everything down.
Brief like a pro
Give a tight one-page brief. Hit the points an editor uses to scope time and depth.
- Synopsis. 150 to 300 words on the story or argument. Beginning, middle, end. No teasers.
- Exact word count. Not pages. The number matters.
- Level of edit you want. Developmental, line, copyedit, proofread.
- Genre and audience. Thriller for book club readers. Memoir for grief counselors. Nonfiction for founders.
- Comparable titles. Two or three recent books, with a note on why they align.
- Pain points. Pacing sags in the middle. Voice feels uneven. POV slips in three chapters. Cite page numbers if you know them.
- Special features. Citations, figures, code, footnotes, appendices, foreign terms, glossary.
- Deadline and flexibility. A real date. Note any hard stops, like a launch or agent request.
- File type and tools. Word .docx is standard. Say if you use Google Docs or Scrivener.
- What success looks like. One sentence. I want a clean draft ready for beta readers. Or, I want to know if the structure works.
Copy this skeleton and fill it in. Editors will exhale and send clear quotes.
Mini exercise. Draft your synopsis right now in five sentences. Cut any backstory that does not affect the ending.
A quick example of comps:
- For readers of The Night Circus and The Ten Thousand Doors of January. Magical realism with a travel motif. Focus on found family and slow-burn romance.
Start with a manuscript assessment
If you are not sure what level you need, ask for an assessment first. This is a fast read and a short memo or call that answers one question. Where should you spend money next.
A solid assessment will:
- Identify the big issues that block progress.
- Point to the right level of edit.
- Outline next steps in order. Fix structure, then voice, then polish.
Example. A novelist wanted a line edit. The assessment showed three plot threads that never resolved and a late entry POV. We paused the line work, the author revised in four weeks, then we edited clean prose once. Total spend dropped because we did not polish scenes that were cut.
Ask what the assessment includes. Page range read. Length of memo. Whether a call is part of it. When you receive it.
Look for quality signals
Professionals show their process up front.
- Sample edit. One to five pages from the middle of your draft. Expect tracked changes and margin notes. Look for edits that respect your voice, not rewrites that turn you into someone else.
- Clear contract. Scope, deliverables, number of passes, timeline, payment schedule, revision window, confidentiality, and what counts as out of scope. If the quote looks great and the contract is foggy, slow down.
- References and portfolio. Short testimonials with names and book titles. Links to published work in your genre.
- Timeline you can plan around. Start date, delivery windows, buffer for your review, and how holidays are handled.
- Communication plan. Response times, meeting options, and how feedback is shared.
Red flags. Vague promises. No sample. No written scope. Pressure to start before terms are set.
Make your manuscript easy to price
You pay more when an editor has to untangle formatting. Clean files save hours.
- Standardize formatting. 12-point Times New Roman or similar. Double spaced. One-inch margins. Paragraphs indented with styles, not tabs.
- One space after periods. Consistent quotation marks. Pick smart or straight quotes and stick with them.
- Remove extra spaces, stray line breaks, and manual hyphens at the ends of lines.
- Label chapters and scene breaks the same way throughout.
- Include a title page with your name, email, word count, and version date.
- Accept tracked changes from your last round so your file is readable.
- Keep your author queries at the top as a short list, not sprayed through the margins.
Mini exercise. Spend twenty minutes with Find. Replace double spaces with single. Replace tabs with proper indents. Fix any accidental ALL CAPS.
If your book has citations, send a sample of the reference list and note the style you prefer. Chicago notes and bibliography. APA. IEEE. The choice affects time.
How to ask for the quote
Offer detail, then ask three clear questions.
A sample email:
Hello [Name],
I am seeking a [level of edit] for my [genre], [exact word count] words. Target readers are [audience]. Comps are [Title A] and [Title B] for tone and structure.
Pain points. [Two bullets.]
Special features. [Citations, figures, multilingual terms, back matter.]
Deadline. [Date]. I have [some or no] flexibility.
Would you please share:
- Availability and timeline
- A quote with deliverables and number of passes
- Whether a short sample edit is possible
I have attached the first [X] pages and the full synopsis. The full manuscript is in .docx and ready to send.
Thank you,
[Name]
Short, complete, friendly. You will get a useful response.
Read the quote like an editor
When the quotes land, look past the headline number.
- Convert to an effective per-word rate for comparison.
- Note what is included. Sample length, passes, meetings, editorial letter, style sheet, proof pass.
- Check limits. Hours capped. Rounds capped. How extra time is billed.
- Scan the timeline. Does it include your review window between passes.
- Confirm file formats. Word with tracked changes. PDF with comments. Both.
- Ask how follow-up works. Do you get a week for questions. Are calls included.
A clear quote is worth more than a cheap one that hides the real work.
One last thing that saves money
Send the version you feel proud of, not the version you finished at 2 a.m. Run a light self-edit first. Read your first chapter aloud. Fix obvious repeats. Delete filler scenes you already plan to cut. Every hour you save the editor shows up in your price.
Good briefs lead to good quotes. Good quotes lead to smoother work. You make that happen by being specific, tidy, and transparent. Editors notice. They respond in kind.
Smart Budgeting Without Sacrificing Quality
You save money by working in the right order and doing what you do best before paying someone else to do it. The key is timing your investment to match your manuscript's stage, not your bank account's mood.
Phase the work to avoid waste
Edit in waves. Each stage builds on the last. Skip steps and you end up paying twice.
Start with structure. A manuscript assessment or developmental editing comes first. This catches big problems while they are still cheap to fix. Plot holes. Character arcs that vanish. Pacing that drags for fifty pages. Arguments that circle without landing.
Fix these issues yourself. Revise scenes, move chapters, cut subplots that lead nowhere. Get the bones right.
Then move to line editing. Now you polish prose that will stay in the book. Voice, flow, sentence rhythm, word choice. You are not paying someone to perfect sentences you plan to delete.
Copyediting comes next. Grammar, punctuation, consistency, fact-checking. The editor works with clean, stable text. Hours drop when they are not wrestling with structural problems.
Proofreading closes the loop. Final typos and layout issues after you have made your last changes.
Example. A memoir writer jumped straight to copyediting. Three chapters wandered off topic. Two time jumps confused readers. The copyeditor spent time polishing rambling passages that the writer cut during revision. Total cost bloated by 40%. We should have started with structure.
Here is the smart sequence:
- Manuscript assessment (optional but wise if you are unsure)
- Your revision based on the assessment
- Developmental edit (if needed after your revision)
- Your second revision
- Line edit
- Your polish
- Copyedit
- Proofread
Each stage assumes the previous work is done. Skip steps at your own expense.
DIY where you add the most value
You know your story better than anyone. Use that knowledge to handle work that does not require an editor's skills.
Run a self-edit first. Read the whole manuscript. Flag scenes that feel slow or off. Mark places where you lost the thread. Note characters who disappear or act out of character. Circle awkward sentences. You will catch half the issues before the editor sees page one.
Use a style guide. Pick Chicago, AP, or APA and stick with it. Learn the basics of your chosen style. Capitalization. Numbers. Quotation marks. Apostrophes. An editor charges less when they are not teaching you grammar rules.
Resolve big-picture issues yourself. You know where the story wants to go. An editor flags problems. You solve them. Do not pay editorial rates for brainstorming sessions.
Batch your research and fact-checking. Collect all your questions about historical details, technical accuracy, or legal points. Handle them in one focused session. Editors charge by the hour for research. You charge yourself nothing.
Clean up obvious problems before you submit. Run spellcheck. Delete extra spaces. Fix formatting. Remove placeholder text. Every hour you save an editor shows up as money in your pocket.
A quick self-edit checklist:
- Does each scene advance the plot or reveal character?
- Are transitions clear between scenes and chapters?
- Do characters sound distinct from each other?
- Have you used your strongest verbs and cut weak adverbs?
- Are your chapter breaks in the right places?
- Does the opening hook and the ending satisfy?
Spend two weeks on this before you hire anyone. You will be amazed what you catch.
Use benchmarks as starting points, not rules
Industry rate guides give you ranges, not fixed prices. The Editorial Freelancers Association publishes rates. The Chartered Institute of Editing and Proofreading does the same. Reedsy shares marketplace data. All useful. None binding.
Rates vary by region, experience, specialization, and demand. A developmental editor in Manhattan charges more than one in Kansas. Someone with twenty romance bestsellers commands higher fees than a generalist. Award winners book solid and price accordingly.
Use these guides to spot outliers. Quotes far below the range might signal inexperience or corner-cutting. Quotes far above might reflect premium positioning or padded scope. Both deserve questions.
Example ranges for reference:
- Developmental editing: $0.08-$0.20+ per word
- Line editing: $0.05-$0.15+ per word
- Copyediting: $0.03-$0.10+ per word
- Proofreading: $0.02-$0.05+ per word
Your actual price depends on complexity, timeline, and editor experience. A simple romance might hit the low end. Dense nonfiction with citations hits the high end. Rush jobs cost extra everywhere.
Convert all quotes to per-word rates for comparison. A $3,000 flat fee for 60,000 words equals $0.05 per word. An hourly editor who estimates 40 hours at $75 per hour also equals $0.05 per word ($3,000 ÷ 60,000). Now you can compare apples to apples.
Prioritize the stage that addresses your biggest risks
Not every manuscript needs every type of edit. Spend where the problems are worst.
If your plot has holes and your pacing drags, start with developmental editing. If your story works but your prose feels clunky, go straight to line editing. If you are confident in structure and voice but worry about grammar and consistency, copyediting might be enough.
Ask yourself these questions:
- Do beta readers get confused about what happens or why?
- Do agents or critique partners point to the same structural issues?
- Does your writing feel choppy or hard to follow?
- Are you unsure about grammar rules and punctuation?
- Do you spot typos every time you reread?
Your answers point to the right investment. You do not need to buy every service. Buy the one that fixes your biggest weakness.
A science fiction writer came to me with clean prose and solid grammar but a plot that collapsed in the third act. We skipped line editing and copyediting. One developmental edit fixed the story. The writer polished the prose and hired a proofreader for the final pass. Total cost: 60% less than a full editorial package.
Consider payment plans and realistic timelines
Many editors offer payment plans. Half upfront, half on delivery. Monthly installments for long projects. Milestone-based payments tied to completion of sections.
Ask about options when you request quotes. Editors prefer steady work to empty calendars. Most will work with you if you communicate needs upfront.
Set realistic timelines to avoid rush fees. Good editors book weeks or months in advance. Rush projects cost 25-50% more and often get squeezed into holidays and weekends.
Plan backwards from your deadline. Add time for:
Frequently Asked Questions
What should I send an editor to get an accurate quote?
Send a one-page brief (synopsis, exact word count, genre, audience, top three pain points), your deadline, and 1,000–3,000 words of a representative sample—preferably a tricky chapter rather than a polished prologue. This "sample pages for an editing quote" lets editors gauge complexity and give a realistic estimate.
Also state the level of edit you want (developmental, line, copyedit, proofread), any citation or formatting needs, and preferred deliverables (style sheet, editorial letter, number of passes). Clear briefs produce cleaner, fairer quotes.
When is per‑word pricing appropriate, and when should I choose hourly or per‑project rates?
Per-word pricing suits predictable, mechanical work—proofreading and straightforward copyediting—where words accurately predict time. Use it when your draft is clean and the scope is well defined; it's great for budget certainty.
Choose hourly for murky, high‑variation work like developmental editing or heavy research; choose per‑project (flat fee) when you want a bundled service with set deliverables and one total price. Compare "per-word vs hourly editing comparison" by converting estimates to an effective per-word rate and checking included deliverables.
How do turnaround times and rush fees change my editing quote?
Tighter timelines typically trigger rush premiums because editors rearrange schedules and may work evenings or weekends. Expect common "rush fee percentage for editing" ranges of around 25–50% for substantially shortened turnarounds; extreme deadlines can cost more.
Always state your deadline up front. Some editors offer staged delivery or limited rush slots to reduce cost; others will quote a clear rush surcharge so you can decide whether to pay for priority scheduling.
Are author queries, a style sheet and revision rounds usually included in a per‑word quote?
It depends. Some per‑word quotes include a style sheet and a limited number of queries and revision passes; others charge extra for author queries or follow-up reviews. Never assume—ask explicitly "are author queries included in per-word rate?" when you request a quote.
If these items matter to you, request a detailed fee schedule and confirm how many revision rounds, how long post‑delivery support lasts, and whether a style sheet is provided as part of the base rate.
How does manuscript complexity—citations, multilingual text or figures—affect the price?
Complex elements raise the hours required and therefore the quote. Academic citations, tables, multilingual passages, invented languages or extensive worldbuilding need extra verification, consistency checks and often specialist knowledge—editors will factor that into higher per‑word rates or hour estimates for "technical or academic manuscript editing with citations".
Mention these features in your brief and include a sample reference list or a page with multilingual text so the editor can give a more accurate estimate rather than a generic rate that underprices the work.
What should a per‑project package typically include so I can compare offers?
A comprehensive project package usually covers an initial manuscript assessment, the agreed level of editing, an editorial letter, a custom style sheet, one or more revision rounds, a final proofread and a set number of consultation calls or email support. Look for explicit "project package inclusions" in the quote.
When comparing packages, list the number of passes, length or depth of the editorial letter, included meetings, turnaround time and what triggers extra charges—this lets you compare true value, not just headline price.
How can I reduce my editing costs without sacrificing quality?
Phase the work: start with an assessment or developmental edit, revise yourself, then commission line editing and copyediting. Do basic self‑editing and tidy your files to avoid paying an editor for formatting cleanup—see "how to prepare manuscript for editing quote" tips like standardising fonts and removing extra line breaks.
Provide clear briefs, send representative sample pages, and bundle services where sensible (e.g. line edit plus copyedit package). These moves reduce unnecessary rounds and make every paid hour count toward improving your manuscript.
Download FREE ebook
Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.
'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent