How does Book Editing Work

How Does Book Editing Work

Gary Smailes
Gary Smailes | 3 November 2025

The Editing Stages at a Glance

Think staircase, not elevator. Start wide, finish narrow. Assessment. Developmental. Line. Copyediting. Proofreading. Follow that order and you avoid polishing pages that will get cut.

Manuscript assessment

A global read, plus a memo. No tracked changes. No line fixes.

Quick example. A thriller lands with strong voice, yet stakes fade after chapter five. The memo points to a flat midpoint, suggests a compressed timeline, and recommends moving one reveal forward. One letter, weeks saved.

Developmental editing

Structure, plot, pacing, character arcs, scene order. Big moves live here.

Mini test. Outline every scene in one line. Goal. Conflict. Outcome. If half the scenes show no change, developmental work belongs on the calendar.

Line editing

Sentence and paragraph level. Voice, clarity, rhythm, and flow.

Before and after, simplified.

Copyediting

Grammar, usage, spelling, punctuation, consistency, and continuity.

Tip. Keep the style sheet for future books in the same series. Consistency earns trust.

Proofreading

Final safety net after layout or ebook formatting.

Leave heavy rewrites for earlier stages. Big changes at proof stage risk new errors and layout chaos.

How to pick the right stage

Match symptoms to service.

Two quick self-checks.

Different paths by publishing route

One last nudge from the trenches. Respect the order. Fix the engine before shining the chrome. Your future self, and your reviews, will feel the difference.

How an Edit Starts: Scoping, Samples, and Agreements

Before any red ink, a short scoping chat sets direction. A good start saves money, saves time, and spares nerves.

Share a tight brief

Give the basics in one short note.

Example email:

Subject: Thriller, 85k, line edit for June

Body: Debut standalone thriller, 85,000 words. Adult audience. Strong plot in place, looking to sharpen voice, trim repetition, and smooth action scenes. Querying in August. Requesting a sample on chapter 3, pages 4–8.

Keep it simple. Add comps if helpful. Add any sensitive topics. Editors appreciate a clear map.

Mini exercise. Write one paragraph which covers those five points. Read aloud. Trim anything vague.

Ask for a sample edit

A sample edit shows approach, tone, and how changes read on the page. One to five pages is standard. Pick a representative section, not only the opening. The first chapter often gets extra polish. Middle pages reveal true habits.

What to look for:

Red flag. No sample offered, no portfolio, and a rush to invoice. Step back.

Agree on scope and deliverables

Name the outcomes before work begins. Precision protects both sides.

A quick example package:

If the project includes substantial restructuring, add a scene map or beat outline to the deliverables list.

Clarify standards and files

State the rulebook and tools.

One note on voice versus rules. A good editor bends rules when voice requires it, and records those choices on the style sheet. Rhythm matters. So does consistency.

Contract basics

Put the agreement in writing. A simple contract protects the work and the working relationship.

Include:

Ask questions before signing. No editor worth hiring will bristle at clarity.

Prep the manuscript

Deliver a clean file. Editors love a tidy desk, even a digital one.

Front matter and back matter belong in the file. Title page, dedication, acknowledgments, notes, bibliography, and any appendices. For images, tables, and figures, insert a labeled placeholder and provide a folder with high-resolution files.

Quick test. Print one page. Hold it at arm’s length. Paragraphs should look uniform. No ladders of rivers. No random fonts. Clarity first.

Set expectations for communication

Editing is a collaboration. Agree on how to talk and how often.

During the edit, answer questions that touch on intent or factual nuance. Silence leaves holes. A three-line reply now often saves an hour of guesswork later.

Money and schedule, without surprises

Plan for payment and timing that match your budget and calendar.

If a deadline slips on either side, discuss before the slide starts. Honest updates build trust.

Two quick checklists

Scoping checklist for authors:

Submission checklist for files:

Start with clarity, and the whole project runs smoother. A sharp brief, a fair contract, a clean file, and a shared plan. That quartet sets up strong pages and a low-stress edit.

Developmental Editing: Big-Picture Revisions

Developmental editing tackles the hard questions. Does the story work? Do the characters matter? Will readers keep turning pages?

This is surgery, not cosmetics. The editor reads for architecture, not typos. They map your story's bones and tell you where the structure needs reinforcement.

What gets examined

A developmental editor scans eight core areas.

Premise strength. Is the central concept compelling enough to carry a full book? Does the setup promise conflict, growth, and resolution? Weak premises doom strong execution.

Plot cohesion. Do events flow logically from cause to effect? Are the stakes clear and escalating? Does each scene advance the story or develop character? Random events kill momentum.

Pacing. Does the story move at the right speed for its genre and audience? Thrillers need constant forward motion. Literary fiction allows more reflection. But every story needs rhythm.

Point of view. Is the POV consistent and effective? Does the chosen perspective serve the story? Head-hopping confuses readers. Distant third person flattens emotion.

Character motivation. Do characters want things badly enough to drive action? Are their goals clear and their obstacles meaningful? Passive protagonists bore readers.

Worldbuilding. Does the setting feel real and consistent? Are the rules of the world clear? Fantasy and science fiction need extra attention here, but every story builds a world.

Theme. What is the story really about? Theme emerges from character choices under pressure. Heavy-handed messaging backfires.

Market positioning. Does the story fit its intended genre and audience? Are the word count and content appropriate? Publishers have expectations.

The editorial letter

The heart of developmental editing is the editorial letter. This document runs five to fifteen pages and dissects your manuscript with surgical precision.

A strong editorial letter opens with praise. What works well? Where does your voice shine? Good editors lead with strengths before diving into problems.

Then comes the diagnosis. Major issues get priority. Plot holes before comma splices. Character arcs before word choice. The editor explains not just what's wrong, but why readers will struggle.

Next, solutions. Concrete, actionable steps. Not "improve pacing" but "cut the flashback in chapter three, start chapter four with dialogue, and move the revelation about Sarah's secret to chapter seven."

The letter closes with a revision plan. What to tackle first, what to save for later. A roadmap prevents overwhelm.

Margin comments and queries

While the editorial letter handles big-picture issues, margin comments target specific moments. These appear as digital sticky notes in your manuscript.

"This scene feels slow. What if Marcus arrived late and angry?"

"I'm confused about the timeline. When did the robbery happen?"

"Beautiful description, but does it advance the plot?"

Good margin comments ask questions instead of giving commands. They invite collaboration.

The revision workflow

Developmental editing follows a predictable sequence.

Read and diagnose. The editor reads your complete manuscript, taking notes on structure, character, and story logic. This first read is about understanding, not fixing.

Map the problems. The editor creates a scene-by-scene breakdown, noting what each scene accomplishes and where gaps appear. Some editors use spreadsheets. Others prefer index cards or beat sheets.

Propose solutions. The editorial letter and margin comments offer specific remedies. Scene cuts, chapter reorders, character arc adjustments, new scenes to fill gaps.

Author revision. You make the changes, following the roadmap but preserving your voice. This is the heavy lifting.

Optional check-in. Some editors offer a follow-up read on revised sections to ensure the fixes worked. Others provide phone calls or brief written responses.

Tools that help

Smart editors use visual aids to clarify story problems.

Reverse outline. A chapter-by-chapter summary of what happens and why. Gaps in logic become obvious. So do scenes that serve no purpose.

Scene cards. Index cards with one scene per card. Plot threads in different colors. Rearrange cards to test new structures.

Beat sheets. Story beats mapped against genre expectations. Where should the inciting incident fall? The midpoint twist? The dark moment?

Synopsis pressure test. Write a one-page summary. If the synopsis is boring, the story needs work. If plot points seem random, the structure needs tightening.

Protecting voice during surgery

The biggest fear writers have about developmental editing is losing their voice. Good editors address this head-on.

Voice lives in word choice, sentence rhythm, character perspective, and emotional truth. Structure changes don't threaten voice. A reorganized plot told in your voice is still your story.

But stay alert during revisions. Read changes aloud. If a paragraph doesn't sound like you wrote it, rewrite it in your style.

Trust your instincts when editor suggestions feel wrong. A good editor wants your story to succeed in your voice, not become their story in your name.

Version control and revision discipline

Developmental editing generates multiple drafts. Stay organized.

Name files with version numbers and dates: Novel_Dev_v02_2025-02-15.docx. Keep previous versions until the project is complete.

Create a revision log. Track what you changed and why. "Moved Sarah's backstory from chapter 2 to chapter 8. Cut the grocery store scene. Added conflict to the dinner party."

Set deadlines for revision rounds. Perfectionism kills productivity. Give yourself four weeks to implement major changes, then stop. Move to line editing.

Save the original draft in a separate folder. You might need pieces of it later.

What to expect in terms of time and rounds

Developmental editing takes time. The editor needs two to six weeks to read, analyze, and write the editorial letter. Complex manuscripts or heavily booked editors take longer.

Your revision time depends on the scope of changes. Minor tweaks take a few days. Major restructuring takes weeks or months.

Most developmental editing includes one full pass and one follow-up review. The follow-up might be a second editorial letter, a phone call, or written comments on revised sections.

Budget for revision time in your publishing timeline. A developmental edit followed by thorough revision easily takes three to six months.

When to stop and move forward

The hardest part of developmental editing is knowing when to stop. There's always more to polish.

Stop when the story works. Readers care about characters. The plot makes sense. The pacing feels right. The ending satisfies.

Stop when diminishing returns set in. You're making small adjustments that don't substantially improve the reader experience.

Stop when the deadline approaches. Books are finished, not perfect.

A developmental editor's job is to make your story the best version of itself, not to make it flawless. Trust the process, implement the big changes, and move to the next stage.

The goal is a story that works for readers. Everything else is perfectionism in disguise.

Line Editing and Copyediting: Clarity, Style, and Consistency

Structural knots got sorted. Now the spotlight lands on sentences, paragraphs, and correctness. Line editing shapes voice and flow. Copyediting enforces grammar, usage, and consistency so readers glide without stumbles.

What line editing polishes

Line work lives in the sentence. The goal is clean rhythm, clear meaning, and a voice readers trust.

A few before-and-after nips:

Notice the shift away from filters like felt, seemed, noticed. Direct description lands harder.

A line editor will flag repetition, clichés, vague qualifiers, and overexplanation. Expect notes on dialogue tags, body language, and interiority. Expect questions like, “Do you need this beat?” and “Whose thought is this?”

What copyediting enforces

Copyediting answers to rules. Not rules for rules’ sake, rules that free readers from confusion.

House resources guide decisions. For most trade books, editors defer to The Chicago Manual of Style for style and to Merriam-Webster for spelling. Technical or academic work may call for a different guide.

The style sheet, your project’s memory

A style sheet prevents drift across three hundred pages. Expect a living document that records decisions such as:

Ask for the style sheet with the copyedit. Keep it for proofreading and production. Consistency survives handoffs when this document follows the book.

Tracked changes and queries

Line and copy edits arrive with tracked changes and margin queries. Those red marks look loud on first pass. Breathe. Red means attention, not failure.

What to expect:

Respond with clarity:

Tone matters on both sides. Treat queries as collaboration, not scorekeeping.

Standards and common checks

Every manuscript brings gremlins. A seasoned editor hunts for:

For nonfiction, add cross-checks for figures, references, captions, and table titles. For memoir, verify names and dates where possible and cleared.

How to review edits without losing your voice

You hold the steering wheel. The edit offers choices, not orders.

A quick exercise: pick a scene of 800 words. Cut 10 percent without losing meaning. Then read both versions aloud. Hear the lift in pace. Save that lean version.

File hygiene and version control

Messy files waste days. Protect the master document.

What success looks like

By the end of line and copyediting, sentences read clean and confident. Voice feels strong. Grammar choices follow a rule set. Names, dates, and terms line up across chapters. Readers glide, and you stop tripping over small snags.

The last word on this stage belongs to restraint. Perfect grammar never rescued a dull line, and pyrotechnics never rescued nonsense. Aim for prose that serves story and meaning. Clarity first, then music, then finish the pass and move forward.

Proofreading and Production: Final Checks Before Publication

The book is typeset. Formatted. Ready for readers. Almost.

Proofreading happens after layout, not before. You work from page proofs or formatted ebook files, hunting typos and layout glitches that survived every previous pass. This is quality control, not rewriting.

When proofreading happens

Traditional publishers proof after typesetting. The text lives in its final home, complete with page numbers, headers, footers, and chapter breaks. Self-publishers proof after ebook formatting or print layout design.

Why wait until now? Layout introduces fresh problems. Line breaks split words oddly. Page breaks orphan single lines. Headers pick up wrong chapter titles. Formatting code scrambles italics or drops quotation marks.

The later you proof, the fewer surprises printing brings.

What proofreaders hunt

Eyes scan for errors, not ideas. The focus stays narrow and mechanical.

Typography and formatting:

Layout problems:

Content errors:

Print-specific checks

Print books demand extra attention to physical layout.

Margins and spacing:

Hyphenation and breaks:

Front and back matter:

Ebook-specific checks

Digital files bring different headaches.

Functionality:

Display issues:

Format compatibility:

Test across devices. What looks perfect on a computer screen may break on a six-inch reader.

The golden rule of proofing

Change as little as possible. Every edit risks new problems.

A typo fix is fine. A punctuation correction is fine. Rewriting a sentence is dangerous. Moving a paragraph is expensive. Adding or cutting text triggers reflow, which shifts line breaks, page breaks, and spacing throughout the book.

Publishers charge for extensive proof corrections because layout changes cost time and money. Self-publishers face the same problem: fix one thing, break three others.

When you spot a real problem, mark it clearly. But resist the urge to perfect prose at this stage. That work should have finished during copyediting.

Prepress checklist for self-publishers

Before approving final files, verify the business details.

Legal and identifying information:

Professional credits:

Marketing copy:

Technical specifications:

Reading strategies for catching errors

Proofreading demands different eyes than editing. Use tricks to slow down and see fresh.

Change your perspective:

Take breaks:

Scan systematically:

Common proof stage disasters

Learn from others' mistakes.

The rewrite trap: Author decides to improve a scene during proofs. Changes trigger reflow. New typos appear. Deadline slips.

The format scramble: Publisher approves print proofs, then discovers ebook conversion mangled formatting. Rush job introduces fresh errors.

The ISBN mixup: Wrong ISBN gets printed on copyright page. Entire print run becomes waste paper.

The missing acknowledgments: Author forgets to include thank-yous until after printing. Second edition required immediately.

Plan ahead. Prepare front matter early. Test formats thoroughly. Review business details twice.

What success looks like

Clean proofs mean readers focus on story, not errors. Pages look professional. Digital files function smoothly. The book represents you well in the marketplace.

Perfect proofs are impossible. Errors hide despite multiple passes. But thorough proofing reduces mistakes to the occasional, forgivable slip instead of the distracting pattern that marks amateur work.

When proofs come back clean, approve them and move to publication. The book is ready for readers.

Timelines, Rounds, and Collaboration Tips

Schedules make or break an edit. A strong plan keeps stress low and quality high.

How long each stage takes

For most book lengths, here is a sane range. Developmental editing runs 3 to 6 weeks. Line or copy runs 2 to 4 weeks. Proofreading runs 1 to 2 weeks. Build time for your own revisions between these slots. Give yourself at least one week after a dev letter, often two or three. Line edit revisions move faster, yet still need a few days. Proofs deserve a careful pass without rush.

A simple sample calendar:

Pad the ends. Holidays and life love to meddle.

Agree on rounds before work starts

Define the number of passes in writing. Fuzzy plans breed scope creep and budget pain. Examples that work:

Name who does what in each round. Editor marks issues. Author revises. Editor spot-checks changes in agreed sections. No surprise rewrites during proofs. If fresh pages arrive late, schedule moves. State that reality in your agreement.

Communicate on a schedule

A steady cadence saves time. Try a weekly update, brief and boring in the best way.

Subject: Project update, Book Title, Week of Apr 8

Keep a shared query log. A spreadsheet works. Columns to include:

Reply inside the log, not in scattered emails. Finish with a quick call when sticky issues cluster. Set decision deadlines, then move on.

File hygiene that saves projects

Treat your manuscript like source code. Clean files, clear names, single source of truth.

Build a tidy folder tree:

Archive prior rounds. Work only from the latest folder. If a file leaves the cave, rename on return. No mystery copies.

Buffers and handoffs

Every handoff adds risk. Give space for file prep, upload time, and last-minute hiccups. Close of business deadlines help. Midnight targets invite mistakes. If you work across time zones, overlap windows on the calendar. Set meeting times far enough out for both sides to prepare. State response times in your agreement. Example, editor replies to email within one business day, author replies to queries within two.

Managing feedback volume

Large dev letters and heavy line edits overwhelm. Triage in passes.

Short sessions beat marathon days. Fresh eyes catch more.

Money meets schedule

Time equals cost. Extra rounds extend both. If you want an additional pass, agree on a fee and a new date range before work starts. Rush work raises risk. Some projects need speed, fine, but match scope to time. Trim the ask rather than pretend a two-week job fits into two days.

Red flags

Walk away or ask hard questions when you see:

A good editor sets boundaries, asks clear questions, and protects the schedule. You should do the same.

A quick checklist to keep near your keyboard

Do this, and the process feels calm. Pages move through hands on time. You spend energy on words, not chaos. That is the goal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which editing stage should I book first — assessment, developmental, line, copy or proof?

Think staircase, not elevator: start wide and finish narrow. Begin with a manuscript assessment or a developmental edit if you have structural worries. The developmental edit checklist should address plot cohesion, pacing, POV and scene purpose before you spend money on sentence-level work.

Only after structure works do line editing, copyediting and proofreading follow in that order — otherwise you risk polishing pages that will be cut or radically rewired later.

What is a sample edit and why should I ask for one?

A sample edit is a short, paid or free pass on one to five representative pages so you can see an editor’s approach, tone and respect for your voice. Ask for a sample edit on representative pages (not only the opening) to reveal middle‑manuscript habits and how an editor handles dialogue, rhythm and queries.

It’s a low-risk way to check fit, see margin queries, and confirm that the editor records choices on a style sheet and explains fixes rather than simply rewriting your text.

How should I prepare my manuscript before sending it to an editor?

Follow a clear "how to prepare manuscript for editing" routine: deliver one clean .docx with consistent chapter headings, scene breaks marked (***), double spacing, 12‑point standard font and a short style note listing names, spellings and any special terms. Include front and back matter and any reference assets in a labelled folder.

Do basic self‑edits first — scene purpose one-liners, a crutch‑word hunt and beta-reader fixes — so the editor funds their time on the highest‑value issues rather than routine clean‑up.

What belongs in a style sheet and why keep one for future books?

A style sheet for a novel records decisions that must stay consistent across hundreds of pages: character names and nicknames, hyphenation, number formats, spelling choices, invented terms, timeline anchors and any series conventions. Copy editors build this and deliver it with the manuscript.

Keep the style sheet for future books in a series — it is project memory that preserves continuity, speeds production, and prevents recurring errors that frustrate readers.

Why is proofreading done after layout and what does "proofreading after layout" catch?

Proofreading after layout is essential because typesetting and format conversion introduce fresh problems: bad line breaks, orphaned lines, missing italics, corrupted special characters, header/footer errors and pagination issues. Proofreaders check page proofs or formatted EPUB/MOBI files rather than raw manuscript text.

They focus on mechanical and layout errors (typos, doubled words, widows/orphans, wrong page numbers) and avoid heavy rewrites — changing much at this stage risks reflow problems elsewhere in the file.

How long do editing stages take and how many rounds should I expect?

Typical windows: developmental editing 3–6 weeks, line or copyediting 2–4 weeks, proofreading 1–2 weeks — plus your revision time between passes. Most projects include one full pass and one follow-up review or a short cleanup check; more rounds add time and cost.

Agree the number of rounds in your contract, build realistic buffers for holidays and revisions, and follow version‑control practices so handoffs remain tidy and on schedule.

How can I tell if editing will pay for itself (break-even analysis for editing)?

Do a simple break-even analysis for editing: divide the editing cost by your profit per copy to find how many extra sales are needed to recoup the investment. For example, a $6,000 edit and $8 profit per book means you need 750 additional sales to break even.

Factor in likely review lifts and longer-term career benefits — higher average ratings improve discoverability and future sales — and weigh staged spending (dev first, then copy/proof) if immediate cash is limited.

Writing Manual Cover

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent
Get free book