Using Beta Feedback To Improve Your Draft

Gary Smailes | 18 November 2025

Choose the Right Beta Readers and Set the Brief

You do not want random opinions. You want focused eyes that reflect your audience and know the playbook for your genre or category. Build that roster on purpose.

Pick the right readers

Aim for five to eight readers. Enough range to spot patterns. Small enough to manage.

Look for:

• Target readers who buy and finish books like yours.
• Genre-savvy folks who know conventions and pacing norms.
• One stretch reader who sits near your audience but not dead center. Fresh perspective, useful for clarity checks.
• For nonfiction, a subject-matter reader for accuracy.
• For sensitive topics, a lived-experience reader.

Avoid only friends and family, unless they are sharp readers with taste that matches your goals. A kind novice will praise your effort. You need notes that improve the work.

Where to find them:

• Critique partners from classes or forums.
• Genre communities on Discord or Reddit.
• Newsletter audience or street team.
• Colleagues in your field for nonfiction.
• Local writing groups and librarian leads.

Screen gently. Ask for a short sample of feedback on a two-page excerpt. You will learn more from one focused comment than from a long bio.

Quick filter questions:

• Which two recent books did you love in this genre, and why?
• How many hours a week do you read?
• Are you comfortable leaving margin notes and a short survey?

Write a tight beta brief

A good brief saves everyone time. One page, clear and specific. Paste it at the top of the file and in your email.

What to include:

• Premise in two lines.
• Genre and two or three comps.
• Word count and revision stage. Early draft, mid revision, or polish.
• Content warnings. Name them plainly.
• What you are testing. Pacing, clarity, stakes, tone, world rules, logic, actionability.
• Your top three questions.
• Deadline and effort estimate. For example, two weeks, four to six hours.

Fiction sample:

• Premise: A small-town EMT hides a past life as a jewel thief. When old partners return, she must steal again to fund her sister’s surgery, without wrecking her new life.
• Genre and comps: Romantic suspense. Comps, The Kind Worth Saving, The Last Thing He Told Me.
• Word count and stage: 86,000 words, second full revision. Solid structure, testing pacing and motivation clarity.
• Content warnings: Medical trauma, burglary, one on-page death.
• Testing: Did you track her goal hour by hour in the heist? Where did you skim or feel lost about motive? Any moments where the romance undercut tension?
• Deadline: April 30. Expect five hours. Margin notes plus a survey.

Nonfiction sample:

• Premise: A practical guide to running effective async teams.
• Category and comps: Business leadership. Comps, Remote, The Making of a Manager.
• Word count and stage: 65,000 words, post-developmental pass. Testing clarity, examples, and jargon load.
• Content warnings: Layoff anecdotes.
• Testing: Where did you want a case study? Which frameworks felt actionable? Where did terms slow you down?
• Deadline: June 15. Expect four hours. Margin notes welcome, survey required.

Set the practicals

Tell readers how to work, not only what to look for.

• Format: Word with Track Changes, Google Docs comments, or ePub/PDF with page numbers. Pick one primary format.
• How to comment: Margin notes for local friction. Survey for global impressions. No line edits outside obvious typos.
• Detail level: Two or three comments per chapter or section is fine. Depth over volume.
• Deadline: Give a real date. Add a midpoint check-in for questions.
• Contact: Where to ask quick questions. Email or a dedicated thread.

Example note to include near page one:

• Please mark where you skimmed or reread.
• Note any place you felt bored or confused.
• Flag timeline or logic breaks.
• If a chapter sings, say why.

Protect your workflow

Treat this like a small project. A little structure keeps chaos out.

• Version the file. Title_v3_beta is clear. Lock your master copy.
• Back up before sending. Cloud plus one local copy.
• Include a style sheet. Readers will stop flagging choices that are already deliberate.

Style sheet starter:

• Names and spellings: MacKenzie, not Mackenzie. Aria uses Arie as a nickname only in dialogue with Leo.
• Hyphenation: email, shortlist, copyedit. No Oxford comma changes.
• Dialect: Grandma drops g endings. Keep gonna and wanna in her lines.
• World rules: Time travel resets memories for non-travelers. No firearms in Zone Three.
• Terms: Async, standup, PR review. Define on first use in each part.

Tell readers, if you see these choices, they are intentional. Flag only if clarity breaks.

Offer goodwill and boundaries

Good betas trade their time for respect and a sense of impact. Set expectations, then thank them well.

What helps:

• A clear ask and a clear finish line.
• A one-line reminder that you will not argue notes. You will read, weigh, and decide.
• A thank-you note with one sentence on how their time helped the book.
• Perks that fit your budget. Early access, a signed copy, name in acknowledgments, or a gift card.

Sample outreach message:

Subject: Beta read request, async teams book, four hours, due June 15

Hi [Name],

I am seeking a focused beta read for my nonfiction book on running async teams.

Brief:

• 65,000 words, post-developmental pass.
• Testing clarity, examples, and jargon load.
• Two-week window, four hours total, margin notes plus a short survey.

Format: Google Docs. I will share a link with commenting access.

Style notes and content warnings sit on page one.

If you are up for this, reply and I will send the file and survey.

Either way, thanks for considering.

[Your Name]

A quick setup checklist

Set a thirty-minute timer.

• Write a one-paragraph reader profile. Age range, tastes, deal-breakers.
• List three places to find those readers. Post one call today.
• Draft your one-page beta brief. Paste it into your file.
• Create Title_v3_beta. Back it up.
• Build a simple style sheet. One page, five headings.
• Pick format and deadline. Add them to the brief.
• Prep your survey link and test it.

Good beta readers lift your draft. A clear brief helps them do their best work. Give them the right map, then get out of their way.

Design Smart Feedback Tools and Questions

You want usable feedback, not a feelings dump. Build two lanes. A short survey for big-picture impressions. Margin comments for on-the-page friction. Together, they give you why and where.

Set up the survey

Keep it simple. Ten to fifteen questions. Ten to twelve minutes. Use Google Forms or Typeform. Require page numbers or scene labels on any note about confusion, skimming, or delight.

Structure:

• Reader profile: prior exposure to the genre or topic, two recent comps they finished.
• Overall experience: a quick heat check before details.
• Engagement map: where attention rose or dipped.
• Focused prompts by category, fiction or nonfiction.
• Closing asks: what to cut, keep, and expand.

Examples for the top:

• Overall, how engaged did you feel while reading? 1 to 5.
• Where did you pause, skim, or reread? Give page or scene header.
• Where did you feel locked in? Give page or scene header.

Anchor your scales so scores mean something.

• Pacing: 1, stalled often. 3, mixed. 5, smooth and propulsive.
• Clarity: 1, frequent confusion. 3, occasional hiccups. 5, crystal clear.
• Voice: 1, flattened or uneven. 3, steady in parts. 5, distinct and consistent.

Add a short text box after each scale: Why did you choose this number? One sentence is fine.

Fiction prompts that draw out truth

Target the reader’s lived experience on the page. No theory, no taste debates.

• POV clarity: In Chapter 3, whose mind were you inside most of the time? If unsure, note the paragraph where you lost track.
• Empathy: When did you start rooting for the protagonist? Give the beat or line.
• Goal and stakes: What did the protagonist want by the midpoint, and what risk sat under failure? If this feels foggy, point to the first spot you felt unsteady.
• Motivation plausibility: Flag lines where behavior felt off. Quote a phrase and add the page.
• Scene purpose: List one scene you would cut today. Why? What would vanish if it goes?
• World rules: Did any rule shift or break? Cite the rule and the page where the break appeared.
• Antagonist pressure: Name one moment where pressure spiked. Name one where it should have spiked but did not.
• Ending: How satisfied did you feel with the last chapter or denouement? 1 to 5. What missing beat would lift your score by one point?

A quick mini-exercise for readers at the end:

• Write one sentence that sums up the book’s promise as you felt it.
• Name the scene you would re-read tomorrow and why.

Nonfiction prompts that test usefulness

Aim for clarity, logic, and action.

• Thesis: Write the main claim in one line, in your words. If tough, name the paragraph where the claim should live.
• Flow: Where did the argument jump or repeat? Give headers or page numbers.
• Evidence: List one claim that needs a source. What kind of source would persuade you?
• Jargon load: 1 to 5. If score sits under 4, list three terms that slowed you down.
• Examples: Where did you want a case study? Which section earned one fewer than you hoped?
• Steps: After Chapter 3, what would you do first? If nothing came to mind, say so.
• Credibility: Which source felt weak or out of date? Name it.
• Takeaways: Write three bullet points you would tell a colleague. If you stall at two, say where support fell short.

Closing asks:

• One section to cut now and why.
• One section to keep untouched and why.
• One section to expand by one page and what you would add.

Guide margin comments for micro friction

Tell readers how to mark the text. Set expectations in one short note near the top of the file.

• Mark the exact word or line that triggered confusion. Add a five-word note, like, “Lost track of who speaks.”
• Drop a “skimmed here” tag where attention dipped. Add a word on why, such as “repeated info” or “low stakes.”
• Flag timeline or logic breaks with the two points that clash. “He leaves at 6 p.m., arrives before the 5 p.m. meeting.”
• Circle joy. If a sentence pops, say why, so you know what to protect.
• Typos are welcome, though not required. Ask for one pass at the end rather than a trickle during reading.

Keep margin notes practical. Two or three per chapter or section is enough. Depth over volume.

Avoid leading questions

You want honest reactions, not shepherded answers. Spot and fix bias in your form.

Swap these:

• Leading: Was the twist surprising and clever?
• Better: How did the twist land for you? Why?
• Leading: Did the romance shine without slowing the plot?
• Better: Where did the romance raise or lower tension? Give the beat.
• Leading: This framework makes sense, right?
• Better: Where did the framework help you take action, and where did you stall?
• Leading: Are the jokes funny?
• Better: Which lines made you smile, and which felt off tone?

Add one meta question to catch what you missed:

• What did I fail to ask that you wanted to tell me?

Require specifics and receipts

Vague notes waste hours. Tie each opinion to a spot.

• Every criticism needs a location. Page number, scene header, or section title.
• Every low score needs a reason in ten words or fewer.
• Every suggestion needs a verb. Cut, merge, move, clarify, escalate, or replace.

To make this easy, include quick drop-downs in your form:

• Location type: Page number, Chapter, Scene name, Section header.
• Issue type: Clarity, Pace, Stakes, Logic, Motivation, Jargon, Evidence, Proofing.
• Severity: Mild, Notable, Fix before publication.

Keep the tool sharp

A few process tweaks will save pain later.

• Split your form into paths. Fiction questions on one path, nonfiction on the other.
• Add progress bars so readers see the finish line.
• Test the form with one trusted reader before a full send. Trim any question nobody understands.
• Cap free-text boxes at 100 to 200 words. Short pushes focus.
• Put your deadline inside the form header and in the invitation note. Time-bound tasks get done.

A one-page template you can lift

Copy this structure into your form:

Section 1, About You

• Genres or topics you read each month
• Two recent comps you finished

Section 2, Overall Experience

• Engagement, 1 to 5
• One sentence on why

Section 3, Engagement Map

• Where you skimmed or reread, location required
• Where you felt most engaged, location required

Section 4, Focused Prompts

• Fiction or Nonfiction path, use lists above

Section 5, Scales

• Pacing, Clarity, Voice, 1 to 5 with anchors

Section 6, Cut, Keep, Expand

• One of each, plus location

Section 7, Anything Else

• What I failed to ask

Build smart tools, and your readers will hand you patterns, not noise. Ask about their experience, tie opinions to pages, and you will know exactly where to revise next.

Synthesize Notes: Find Patterns, Not Noise

Your inbox is full. Margin notes. Survey scores. Hot takes. Good. Now stop rereading the nicest ones and start sorting.

Build one source of truth

Pull every comment into one sheet. No tabs by reader. One table.

Use columns:

• Source
• Location, page, chapter, scene, or section
• Level, developmental, scene or chapter, line, proofing
• Issue, pacing, clarity, stakes, logic, motivation, jargon, evidence
• Severity, low, medium, high
• Gist, quote the note in a short line
• Suggested fix

Keep each row small. One issue per row. Split long comments.

Two example rows:

• Source: “Sam, YA fan.” Location: Ch. 4. Level: Developmental. Issue: Stakes. Severity: High. Gist: “I forgot why she risks the audition here.” Suggested fix: Reinforce cost before scene starts.
• Source: “Leena, data scientist.” Location: p. 132. Level: Nonfiction, argument. Issue: Evidence. Severity: Medium. Gist: “This claim needs a source newer than 2017.” Suggested fix: Add recent meta-analysis.

Why this helps: no cherry-picking. You see volume, clusters, and repeat trouble.

Code by level, fix in order

Four buckets run the show:

• Developmental, structure or argument
• Scene or chapter, beats or logic
• Line, wording or rhythm
• Proofing, typos or punctuation

Work top down. Cut or move scenes before trimming sentences. Tighten a claim before swapping a verb. Otherwise you polish a paragraph you will later delete.

Quick test for level:

• If the note changes story or argument, it sits at developmental.
• If the note changes a beat inside a scene or a section, it sits at scene or chapter.
• If the note changes wording only, it sits at line.
• If the note fixes a misspelling, it sits at proofing.

Weigh the voices

Not every reader has equal pull. Match weight to fit.

• Target audience and genre-savvy readers sit near the top.
• Outlier tastes sit near the bottom.
• Friends who love you but never read your category sit near the bottom too.

Example. Five romance readers say the meet-cute lands late. One thriller-only uncle wants “more explosions.” You know which way to lean.

Tie choices to your promise to the reader. A cozy mystery needs clues planted and a fair reveal. A startup handbook needs steps, not vibes.

Resolve conflicts by cause

Two readers loved your protagonist. Two bounced. No vote decides this. Find the root.

Translate surface notes into symptoms, then search for cause.

• “Did not connect with the MC.” Check want and need on page. Do we see a clear goal by chapter two. Do we feel cost or risk by the first turn.
• “Middle drags.” Check scene goals and consequences through the midpoint. Look for repeats, travel filler, summary in place of action.
• “Twist felt cheap.” Check setup. Plant evidence earlier, then trim on-the-nose hints.
• “Jargon overload.” Check terms per page and density near definitions. Space new terms, add quick glosses, or swap for common language.

Write a short hypothesis in the sheet. Then test it across rows. If your fix addresses four different complaints, you found a lever worth pulling.

Map hotspots

Make a reverse outline or beat sheet. One line per scene or section. List purpose, turn, and page span.

Now mark each line with tallies from your matrix:

• C for confusion
• B for boredom or skimming
• L for logic or timeline flags
• S for stakes missing
• E for evidence gaps

Three C marks in early chapters points to clarity work at the front. A streak of B through 120 to 170 points to a sagging middle. A burst of L near the climax points to blocking or timing.

Fiction tip: draw the protagonist’s goal down the left margin of your outline. If three scenes in a row do not move the goal, prune or combine.

Nonfiction tip: write your thesis at the top of each section. If a paragraph does not support that line, move or cut.

Separate taste from problems

Taste is “I prefer first person” or “I do not like swears.” Problems are “I lost track of who speaks” or “the timeline breaks.”

Keep voice choices that define you. Fix issues that slow or confuse many readers.

A quick rubric:

• If three or more readers flagged clarity in the same spot, fix.
• If a single reader wanted a different genre vibe, ignore.
• If a reader outside your audience flagged logic, still fix.
• If a trusted genre reader flagged line sparkle, weigh, then decide.

Protect what sings. Kill what muddies.

A short workflow that saves weekends

• Dump every note into the matrix within 48 hours.
• Code level and severity.
• Sort by level, high to low.
• Scan for patterns across sources and locations.
• Write one to three root-cause hypotheses.
• Mark hotspots on your outline.
• Draft a fix list that tackles the highest leverage items first.

Time box each step. Two hours for the dump. One hour for coding. One hour for pattern spotting. Momentum beats perfection.

Mini exercise

Take three conflicting notes from your batch. Write them as symptoms without adjectives.

• “Stopped caring in Ch. 9.”
• “MC feels cold.”
• “Talked past me in Section 2.”

Now ask one question per note.

• What does the MC want in Ch. 9.
• Where do we witness cost.
• Which term lands without a plain-language gloss.

Propose one fix that touches all three. For example, add a scene beat where the MC risks a friendship to pursue the goal, with a visible cost, and use plainer language for the key term. If that move lifts engagement and clarity, you are on the right track.

Two quick examples in the wild

• Fantasy draft. Five readers flagged “lost in the rules” around Ch. 5 to 7. Matrix shows nine C marks in worldbuilding scenes. Hypothesis, rules arrive during action with no anchor. Fix, add a short, in-world primer at Ch. 4, move one reveal later, and restate a core rule in dialogue before the heist. Second pass scores for clarity rise from 2s and 3s to 4s.
• Business book. Three readers flagged “soft evidence” in Part II. Matrix shows five E marks on the same framework. Hypothesis, claims lean on anecdotes only. Fix, add two recent studies, swap a story for a table of outcomes, and include a checklist with sources. Skeptic scores rise, and readers report actionable steps.

Patterns give you direction. Noise drains time. Build the matrix. Code with care. Weigh the right voices. Hunt root causes. Mark hotspots. Keep your voice, fix the friction. Then move on with a plan, not a hunch.

Build a Focused Revision Plan from the Data

You gathered a heap of notes. Good. Now turn that pile into a plan that saves weeks, not steals them.

Build an issues list that guides every pass

Open a fresh sheet. Group issues by theme:

• Structure
• Character or ethos
• Pacing
• World or terminology
• Logic
• Clarity

Add a status tag for each row:

• Must Fix
• Nice to Have
• Out of Scope

Keep rows short. One problem per row. Add location, severity, and a quick quote from the feedback.

Sample entries:

• Structure, Must Fix, Ch. 1–3. “Opening feels aimless.” Severity: High. Location: pages 1–28.
• Character, Must Fix, Ch. 9. “Protagonist choice carries no cost.” Severity: High. Location: scene at the docks.
• Pacing, Nice to Have, Ch. 14–16. “Skimmed travel recap.” Severity: Medium.
• Logic, Must Fix, Ch. 20. “Timeline jumps one week with no cue.” Severity: High.
• World or terminology, Must Fix, Part I. “Jargon heavy. Define ‘throughput’.” Severity: Medium.
• Clarity, Must Fix, Ch. 3. “Thesis hard to spot.” Severity: High.

Fiction angle: include beats like inciting incident, midpoint, and climax in the Structure bucket.

Nonfiction angle: include thesis, claims, and evidence in the Structure bucket.

Start with high‑impact changes

High‑impact work shifts reader experience fast. Chase those first.

• Restructure beats. Move the hook sooner. Place the inciting event where tension starts to climb.
• Merge or cut redundant scenes or sections. One decisive scene beats three soft ones.
• Tighten the opening. Promise genre or topic by page one. Signal stakes by page five.
• Strengthen the midpoint turn. Raise risk. Close an easy path.
• Clarify thesis claims. Put the core claim in one sentence. Place that line near the start of each section that supports it.

Quick examples:

• Novel: readers miss the goal until Ch. 4. Move the goal reveal into Ch. 1, then trim backstory that blocks momentum.
• Business book: readers doubt a core claim. Add two current sources near the first mention, then run a short case summary to anchor proof.

Translate notes into concrete tasks

Notes feel fuzzy. Tasks drive progress. Recast each note as a verb-led task with a target location and a measure.

Use this pattern:

• Action verb
• Target
• Purpose
• Check

Examples:

• Raise stakes in Ch. 12 by forcing a cost. Check: mentor declines help unless the hero sacrifices a lead.
• Replace info‑dump in Ch. 5 with on‑page action. Check: show the rule through a failed attempt.
• Add example to Chapter 3’s framework. Check: one real case with numbers and a named source.
• Clarify timeline around Ch. 20. Check: day and time stamps in scene headers.
• Define ‘throughput’ on first use. Check: one plain‑language gloss in a margin callout.

Write tasks in a single list. Sort by Must Fix first. Then batch by location to reduce thrash.

Prototype solutions before locking in

When a change alters flow, test options. Draft two openings or two chapter orders. Share with one or two trusted betas who fit your audience.

Keep the test simple:

• Version A: cold open with problem on page one
• Version B: brief status quo, then the problem by page three

Ask three questions only:

• Which version held attention longer
• Where did attention dip
• Which promise matches the genre or topic you aim to deliver

Pick a winner. Archive the other version in a cut folder for later use.

Schedule passes that stack, not collide

Work in layers. Each pass serves one goal.

Pass 1, developmental:

• Restructure scenes or sections
• Fix thesis placement and claims
• Remove or merge duplicates
• Confirm beats or argument spine

Pass 2, scene or chapter craft:

• Sharpen goals, stakes, and turns
• Fix logic jumps inside scenes
• Add or trim transitions
• Plant clues or signpost subheads

Pass 3, line editing:

• Tighten sentences
• Swap vague verbs for concrete ones
• Prune filler phrases
• Smooth voice across chapters

After each pass, update a style sheet and a change log. Note decisions on spelling, dialect, terms, and formatting. Future-you will thank you.

Time helps discipline. Block short, focused windows:

• Two hours for developmental changes in one hotspot
• Ninety minutes for a cluster of scenes
• One hour for a line pass over a single chapter

Stop at the block’s end, log progress, and plan the next move before closing the file.

Set exit criteria so revision ends

Define success before you start, then test against those markers.

Good criteria:

• No recurring confusion in mapped hotspots across two fresh readers
• Pacing scores at 4 out of 5 or higher from two fresh readers
• Opening hook confirmed by target readers within the first chapter or first section
• Thesis stated clearly within the first ten pages, echoed at each section head
• Word count sits inside genre or category norms
• Style sheet stable, no new exceptions added in two passes

When the draft meets those marks, move forward. Do not sink more time into tweaks that only suit one outlier.

Mini exercise

Pick three Must Fix rows from your issues list. Write one task per row using the pattern above. Schedule those three tasks across the next week. One per day works well. After each task, ask one check question, then record a quick before and after note. If the change improves two or more feedback themes at once, mark that area complete.

A plan focuses energy. Group the chaos. Tackle high‑leverage work. Turn notes into actions. Test choices. Layer passes. Hold yourself to clear exit signs. That is how a messy feedback pile becomes a sharper draft.

Close the Loop and Move to the Next Editing Stage

You asked for help. People showed up. Close the loop with care, then move forward with purpose.

Thank readers and share what changed

Send one tight note within a week of finishing your revision pass. Hit three beats: gratitude, highlights, next steps.

Subject: Thank you, and what changed

Hi [Name],

Your notes were gold. Here is what changed based on the beta round:

• Cut 8k from the opening. Inciting incident now lands on page 12.
• Clarified the thesis in Chapter 1. Echoed the claim at each section head.
• Merged two side characters. Their role is now one sharper foil.
• Fixed timeline slips in Chapters 16–20. Day and time stamps added.
• Replaced two info dumps with on-page action in Chapters 5 and 9.

If you want a quick second pass on a narrow focus, reply “Yes.” I will send a shorter excerpt with a one-page brief, only if you are up for it.

Thank you again for your time and your brain.

[Your Name]

Only invite a second pass if you changed structure or re-ordered chapters. Keep the ask small. A chapter, an opening, or a new ending. One week deadline. Three questions, no more.

Bring in specialist reads

Some topics need lived experience or deep accuracy. Bring the right person in before you lock text.

• Sensitivity readers. Use for identities, culture, trauma, or any lived-experience topic. Ask for notes on authenticity, harmful tropes, and language. Pay them. Credit them if they agree.
• Subject‑matter experts. Use for medicine, law, finance, science, tech, or niche fields. Ask for factual accuracy, plausibility, and missing context. Provide citations or your source list.
• Editorial assessment. Use when you feel the argument or story still sags, and you want a pro to point to the structural fixes. This is not a full edit. It is a diagnostic with a plan.

Give each specialist a short brief with your goal, a list of known risks, and the specific questions you want answered. Version the file before you send.

Know when to stop iterating

Endless tinkering kills momentum. Watch for these signals.

• Notes converge on taste. “I prefer snarkier voice.” “I wanted more romance.” Keep your promise to the intended reader, not to one outlier.
• Patterns vanish. The same confusion no longer shows up across readers.
• Changes create same‑day undo moves. You add, then remove, then add again. Time to stop.
• You meet your exit criteria. Pacing scores at or above 4 out of 5 from two fresh readers. No recurring confusion in mapped hotspots. Word count inside category norms.
• You feel the urge to rearrange commas to avoid bigger work. That is fear talking. Either commit to a real change or move to the next stage.

When you hit these, step away from beta loops. Move to professional editing.

Prepare for your path

Both paths ask for polish, but in different ways.

Fiction or memoir, querying:

• Sharpen the first ten pages. The goal, tone, and stakes belong there.
• Clean synopsis, one to two pages. State the core arc, no subplots that distract.
• Tight query letter. Hook, short pitch, comps, bio. Use late‑stage reader reactions to shape the hook.
• Proof those pages. Agents meet you on page one.

Nonfiction, querying:

• Strong proposal. Market, comps, chapter summaries, platform, and sample chapters.
• Thesis and promise clear on page one. Evidence list ready.

Self‑publishing:

• Line edit, then copyedit, then proof. Three distinct passes, three different readers if possible.
• Interior layout and cover that fit category norms.
• Advance review copies to early reviewers four to six weeks before launch.
• Back matter in order. Author note, acknowledgments, next‑book tease, mailing list sign‑up.

Track decisions in your style sheet. Lock terms, names, dates, and any dialect rules. Share that sheet with any editor or designer who touches the book.

Put the cut bin to work

Never delete. Park trimmed material in a cut folder labeled by date. Then reuse it with intent.

• Newsletter. Share a deleted scene with a short intro about why it went.
• Bonus chapter or epilogue for subscribers.
• Blog post that expands a side topic you trimmed from the book.
• World notes or lore PDF as a reader magnet.
• Visual snippets for social, one quote card per week.

Add a one‑line rights note to the top of each file. “From [Book Title], copyright [Year, Your Name].” Future you will thank you when you repurpose.

Two quick templates

Second‑pass invite, short:

Subject: One more quick pass, if you are game

Hi [Name],

I made structural changes based on your notes, and I would value a quick check on the new opening. It is 12 pages. Three questions, below. One week deadline. If you are in, reply “Yes” and I will send the PDF.

1. Where did attention dip
2. Does the promise match your genre expectations
3. Any line that pulled you out

Thanks,
[Your Name]

Specialist brief, short:

• Goal: confirm authenticity of [topic] portrayal
• Scope: Chapters 7, 12, and 18
• Questions: any harmful tropes, inaccurate language, or missing context
• Materials: manuscript PDF, style sheet, source list
• Fee and timeline: [amount], feedback by [date]

A simple wrap checklist

• Send thank‑you notes and a “what changed” summary.
• Invite a narrow second pass only if structure moved.
• Book any specialist reads needed, with a focused brief.
• Confirm stop signs. No new patterns, exit criteria met.
• Prep materials for your path, querying or self‑publishing.
• Tag and store the cut bin. Plan one reuse this month.

You asked for feedback to build a better book. Closing the loop with grace keeps those readers in your corner. Moving to the next stage with a clear plan keeps your momentum intact.

Frequently Asked Questions

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent

Leave this empty

Get free book