How To Interpret An Editor’s Comments And Revisions

How to Interpret an Editor’s Comments and Revisions

Understand the Kinds of Editorial Feedback You’ll See

You opened the file. Your stomach flipped. All those comments. Breathe. Each type of note has a job. Learn the job, and the chaos turns into a map.

The editorial letter

This is the big-picture brief. Structure, plot or argument, pacing, arc, theme, genre promise. Read this first. Twice.

What to do with it:

Example note you might see:

Your move:

Mini exercise:

Margin comments and queries

These live in the manuscript. They zoom in on a beat, a paragraph, a line. Clarity, motivation, continuity, logic.

How to use them:

Sample moment:

Your rewrite:

Track Changes

These are suggested line edits. They show one way to sharpen clarity, trim fluff, or shape rhythm. Treat them as proposals.

Rules of thumb:

Example:

Mini move:

Scene map or beat sheet

Think of this as the flight log. A list of scenes or chapters with goal, conflict, outcome, and new question. It shows where the book flies and where it stalls.

What to look for:

Tiny sample lines from a map:

How to use the map:

Style sheet

This is the record of decisions. Names, spellings, hyphenation, capitalization, timeline notes, world terms. Boring to some. Essential to clean pages.

What goes in:

How to use it while revising:

Mini exercise:

Sample developmental edit

This is a test drive before a full engagement. A short pass on a few pages or a sample letter. The goal is to show thinking, scope, and tone.

What to expect:

How to read it:

Questions to ask after a sample:

Pulling it together

Order matters. Try this flow:

  1. Read the editorial letter and set three goals.
  2. Review the scene map against those goals. Mark keep, cut, merge, move.
  3. Tackle margin comments that serve the goals.
  4. Use Track Changes as a guide, not a rule.
  5. Keep the style sheet live so choices stay consistent.

You are not wrestling all forms of feedback at once. You are sequencing them. That is how revision stops feeling like whack-a-mole and starts feeling like work you know how to do.

Decode Common Editor Phrases Into Action

Editors speak in shorthand. Translate the note, then move. Here is how.

“Raise the stakes”

Make loss visible. Name the cost, the deadline, and the pressure from the outside world.

Before: “If she fails, things go bad.”

After: “Miss the 5 p.m. filing, and her father loses the house on Monday.”

Quick move: write one sentence that answers “What fails if the plan fails.” Place that line early in the scene.

“What does the character want here?”

Every scene needs a goal, an obstacle, and an outcome. No goal, no engine.

Before: two pages of banter in a hallway.

After: “He needs the code from the head nurse, who follows protocol with iron grip. He leaves with a partial code and a warning on his record.”

Try this: at the top of each scene, write “Wants X. Blocked by Y. Leaves with Z.” Keep the sentence in the draft until revision locks.

“Head-hopping/POV drift”

One scene, one mind. Readers ride inside one skull. Thoughts from others break the spell.

Before: “Jake wondered if Maria loved him. Maria watched him and thought he looked tired.”

After: “Jake studied Maria’s hands, folded tight. Love, or pity. She did not meet his eyes.”

Check test: highlight every interior line. All highlights should belong to one person.

“Show, don’t tell”

Summary has a place. Action carries heat. Use scene for moments that demand emotion, choice, or change.

Before: “The room was messy, and she felt sad.”

After: “T-shirts on the lamp. Three plates by the sink. She pressed a palm to her eyes.”

Keep summary for time jumps, travel, or known context. Save scene work for turns.

“Tighten”

Trim words that repeat meaning. Merge beats that stall. Clear out scaffolding.

Before: “He nodded his head and then he shrugged his shoulders and then he said, ‘Okay.’”

After: “He shrugged. ‘Okay.’”

Audit pass: search for “was,” “were,” “really,” “very,” “kind of,” “sort of.” Replace weak phrasing with stronger verbs or nothing.

“Info-dump/backstory load”

Readers want forward motion. Fold context into struggle.

Before: one page on the founding of the guild.

After: the guild rules appear when the hero breaks one, loses access, and scrambles for a workaround.

Fast fix: move the backstory to after a question or a setback. Curiosity first, answer second.

“On-the-nose dialogue”

People rarely say the deepest truth. Give each speaker a private agenda. Let implication carry the emotion.

Before:
“I am angry with you for missing my recital.”
“I am sorry, I forgot.”

After:
“You get flowers now.” She sets the bouquet in the trash.
“I thought it was next week.” He does not look at the trash.

Read dialogue aloud. If every line names the feeling, hide the feeling under a move.

“Logic gap/why now?”

Cause and effect binds scenes. The reader needs a reason for timing and choice.

Before: “She quits her job on Tuesday with no warning.”

After: “Payroll ‘misplaces’ her overtime again. On Tuesday, the supervisor laughs. She closes the drawer and hands in her badge.”

Test: write the chain in three lines. Because X, therefore Y, which forces Z.

Nonfiction: “Thesis is buried”

Lead with the promise. Map the route. Deliver on both.

Before: three pages of context with no clear frame.

After: “Remote teams produce stronger quarterly results when leaders fix meetings, feedback, and metrics. This chapter shows a meeting system in five steps. Then a feedback loop. Then a dashboard.”

Quick check: highlight the thesis and each topic sentence. A clean line should appear.

Nonfiction: “Evidence is thin/repetitive”

Varied proof builds trust. One story repeated five ways tires readers.

Before: four founder stories that all praise grit.

After: one founder story, a dataset on survival rates, a quote from a skeptic, and a failure case with lessons.

Build a source log. For each claim, list proof types used. Fill gaps with new forms of evidence.


Pin the note above your desk: translate shorthand into moves on the page. A clear action for each edit phrase turns feedback into progress.

Prioritize and Plan Your Revisions

You have notes. You have feelings. Now you need a plan. Work in layers so effort flows toward the pages that matter most.

Start with triage: macro, meso, micro

Tackle big rocks first.

Quick test for macro health:

Do not touch commas before macro choices lock. Otherwise you will fix sentences that vanish next week.

Build a scene-by-scene spreadsheet

Light, fast, useful. One row per scene or section.

Include columns like:

Example row, short and blunt:

For nonfiction, swap POV for section owner or audience need. Example:

Color-code rows that stall. A grid makes patterns obvious. Three scenes in a row with no turn, red flags.

Make keep, cut, merge, move decisions

Every scene pays rent or leaves.

Tests that help:

Be brave. A clean cut often lifts pace more than any fancy sentence work.

Map to a beat framework

Pick a simple frame and stress-test the spine. Three-act, Save the Cat, or a classic narrative arc, choose one that aids clarity.

For fiction, check:

For memoir, align personal turning points with external events. For narrative nonfiction, treat sections like scenes with evidence-driven turns.

For practical nonfiction, map problem, cause, solution, application. Each chapter needs a promise, a method, and a field test.

Write each beat as one sentence. Place page ranges next to those lines. Gaps or crowding reveal where to expand or compress.

Translate comments into tasks

Comments ask for outcomes. Turn each note into a checklist with verbs.

Examples:

Write tasks where work happens:

Set measurable checkpoints

Vague goals stall progress. Clear targets pull you forward.

Pick units that match the layer:

Build a schedule that respects deep work:

Track momentum:

Protect energy:

Back up versions daily. Name files with dates and phase, for example, 2025‑03‑11_v2_macro. Future you will send thanks.

A quick starter plan

A method turns feedback into pages. Do the right work in the right order, and progress follows.

Work Smart With Track Changes and Margin Comments

You open the file and see a red blizzard. Breathe. Then follow a process.

Read comments before touching the prose

Do a comments-only pass. No edits. No acceptance clicks.

Keep a quick tally on a notepad:

Patterns point to root fixes. If early chapters lack stakes, solve that first. Patching sentences leaves the leak in the wall.

Accept and reject with intent

Do not hit Accept All. Decide by category.

Work top to bottom with a simple rule. If a change improves meaning or consistency without harming voice, accept. If a change aims at intent but misses tone, rewrite that line in your words. Leave a short reply so the editor sees the logic.

Use queries as a decision log

Treat queries as a conversation on the page. Reply, act, resolve.

Sample thread:

Another:

Pushing back, politely:

Short, factual replies save time later when you or a copyeditor reviews the file.

Keep clean versions

Version control lowers stress.

Name files with date and phase. Example: 2025-04-09_MS_v2_macro.docx. Back up to cloud and a local drive. Email yourself the latest file before large passes. Future you will thank present you.

Add a change log at the top or in a separate doc:

Build a personal style sheet

Open a one-page sheet and keep it beside the draft. Pull from the editor’s sheet, then add your decisions.

Sections to include:

Keep this open during revisions. Each time you decide a thing, record it. The sheet guards against drift when fatigue sets in.

Tame the tools in Word and Google Docs

Word tips:

Google Docs tips:

Both tools:

A fast pass plan for one session

Two quick examples

Line edit with a voice rewrite:

Query turned into a task:

Track changes and comments are tools, not verdicts. Use them to see what the reader sees, then decide with a clear head. Good process turns the red blizzard into a to-do list, and a to-do list into a cleaner book.

Collaborate Effectively and Manage the Emotional Side

You hand over pages. You wait. Back comes a file full of markup. Your pulse jumps. Normal. Start with a pause.

Create a cooling-off ritual

During that break, jot three lists:

Naming feelings gives shape to the work. You move from threat response to problem solving.

Translate your reaction into a plan

Try a three-step loop for each hot note.

This turns emotion into motion.

Ask clear questions

Editors love clarity. Good questions shorten the path.

Use prompts like:

Attach page numbers and quotes:

Avoid broad asks. “What do you think?” invites a new review. Target the gap you need to close.

Push back without burning a bridge

You own the book. The editor guides. When a note rubs against your vision or genre norms, respond with respect and a fix.

Sample replies:

Offer an alternative that solves the underlying problem. The subtext you want to send is simple. I heard you. I chose a path. Here is why.

Protect your voice during line edits

Line edits serve meaning and flow. You serve voice.

When a suggestion sounds wrong in your mouth, keep the intent and rewrite.

If rhythm matters, read aloud. If dialect matters, test with a trusted reader from the community you portray. If a humorous beat dies, swap in a joke you would tell.

Leave a note when you diverge:

Make scope and next steps explicit

Ambiguity inflates work. End each exchange with a short plan.

Email template:

Call agenda, 20 minutes:

Confirm in writing:

Triage comments with a traffic light

Color-code or tag threads.

Work red to green. You avoid polishing a scene you will later cut.

Handle praise without losing focus

Praise helps morale. It also teaches you what to keep.

When emotions spike mid-revision

Say you hit a harsh thread. Take five minutes.

Then pick one of two paths:

Momentum beats stewing.

Small exercises that build resilience

A quick case study

Comment: “Why now for the breakup? Feels abrupt.”

Unhelpful reaction: “They missed the setup in ch. 5.”

Useful path:

Keep the relationship healthy

You do not need to agree with every comment. You do need to engage with care, bring reasons, and move the book forward. Protect your voice. Honor the reader. Give your editor something solid to respond to. That is collaboration at its best.

Turn Feedback Into Concrete Rewrites: Mini Before/After Patterns

Opening hook

Start where life changes. Give a goal, a snag, and a whiff of cost.

Before:

I always believed the town would stay the same forever. The river cut through the fields like a silver ribbon and the church bell rang on the hour. People waved from porches. Winters felt long, summers lazy.

After:

The siren sounded at noon and Mara ran for the levee. “Hold,” the deputy yelled, blocking the stairs. “Residents only.” Her father’s house sat three streets over, behind a row of sagging elms. If the flood reached Maple, he would not make it to the door.

Quick steps:

Try this:

POV control

One scene, one mind. Others stay external.

Before:

Nora hated crowds, and her stomach knotted as she pushed through the lobby. John felt guilty for dragging her there, but he also felt proud, since the award mattered. The host thought they looked lost.

After:

Nora slid along the wall, palm on cool marble. John tugged her forward, eyes bright, mouth set in a line that said stay with me. He squeezed her hand when a burst of flash hit. A woman in sequins glanced over them, then kept moving.

Tighten with:

Try this:

Sagging scene

Give the talk a fight. Aim versus aim. Then a turn.

Before:

“We should tell Mom about the move,” Lina said.

“We already talked about it,” Raj said. “She will be upset.”

“I know she will be upset. I worry about her health.”

“Me too. Maybe next week.”

After:

“We tell her tonight,” Lina said, keys in hand.

Raj blocked the door. “Tomorrow. After her test.”

“Tomorrow means another lie.” She pocketed the keys. “You promised no more lies.”

He gave a tight smile. “Fine. Tell her now and you break her before the test. Your call.”

Lina opened the hall closet, pulled out the suitcase, then pushed it back. “We wait. You call her doctor.”

How to jolt a flat talk:

Try this:

Nonfiction chapter flow

Promise, path, proof, practice. Guide the reader.

Before:

After:

Polish with:

Try this:

Exposition overload

Teach through trouble. Let the world’s rules bite.

Before:

The city ran on ration credits, which residents earned through shifts at central hubs. Credits loaded on a wrist chip and expired after a month. Stores reported usage to a central ledger. Penalties applied for hoarding or trading, with fines and suspension of privileges.

After:

Jae slid her wrist under the scanner. Red light. The clerk leaned back. “Expired.”

“No, I worked the whole night.”

“New cycle started at dawn.” He pointed to a sign with a polite smile that reached nobody’s eyes. “No grace period.”

Jae looked at the milk, then at the door. A guard watched the line.

She set the bottle down, palmed a bruised apple, and walked away slow. The gate beeped. The guard moved. The apple cost more than she had.

Build the moment:

Try this:

Quick checklist for turning notes into pages

Keep these patterns near your desk. When a note hits, pick the pattern that matches, run the steps, and move on. Pages change faster when the path is clear.

Frequently Asked Questions

What kinds of editorial feedback will I see and which should I read first?

You’ll typically receive an editorial letter (big picture), margin comments and queries (scene‑level problems), Track Changes suggestions (line‑level proposals), a scene map or beat sheet (the flight log) and a style sheet (decision record). Read the editorial letter first — it sets priorities and explains why the other notes matter.

After the letter, scan the scene map to see where the spine stalls, then do a comments‑only pass in the manuscript to spot patterns before you start editing. This sequence turns different types of editorial feedback you’ll see into an ordered plan rather than chaos.

How do I prioritise revision tasks after an editorial letter?

Use a macro→meso→micro triage: fix spine and stakes first, then scene goals and sequencing, then line polish. Pick three top priorities from the letter, translate each into concrete tasks, and tape a one‑sentence spine over your desk to keep decisions aligned.

Create a simple task sheet sorted by impact (high to low) so you always work the lever with the most lift — for example, “add deadline in ch.2” before you tighten dialogue on ch.10 — and resist polishing until macro issues are solved.

How should I respond to margin comments and work with Track Changes in Word without losing my voice?

Do a comments‑only pass first so you spot recurring issues. When you open Track Changes, don’t Accept All — treat each suggestion as a proposal: accept changes that fix clarity or consistency, rewrite suggested lines that would flatten your cadence, and leave a short reply to queries explaining your choice.

Keep a personal style sheet that merges the editor’s decisions with your voice rules, and use the reply/resolve thread as a decision log so future passes (or a copyeditor) understand why you preserved or altered particular phrasing.

What concrete moves turn shorthand notes like “raise the stakes” or “POV drift” into rewrites?

Translate shorthand into an immediate page move: “raise the stakes” → add a deadline, name a specific loss and seed public fallout; “POV drift” → choose one head for the scene and replace non‑POV interior lines with observable behaviour. For “what does the character want here?” write WANTS X / BLOCKED BY Y / LEAVES WITH Z at the top of the scene and act on it.

Use the mini before/after patterns (opening hook, POV control, sagging scene) as templates: pick the match, apply the three steps, then read aloud to check whether pressure and clarity improved.

How do I build and use a scene‑by‑scene spreadsheet for revision?

Create one row per scene with columns: scene number, purpose, POV, word count, location/time, conflict (who wants what), turn (outcome) and a status (keep/cut/merge/move). For nonfiction swap POV for section owner and evidence type. Colour‑code rows that stall so patterns jump out visually.

Use the sheet to make keep/cut/merge/move calls quickly, to map beat placement against your chosen frame (three‑act, Save the Cat), and to generate a to‑do list of specific scene tasks tied to the editorial letter.

How do I manage the emotional side of heavy editorial feedback?

Pause. Read the editorial letter once, then step away (walk, sleep on it). Make three lists: what feels true, what feels off, what you don’t understand. Naming reactions moves you from threat to problem‑solving mode and prevents defensive, rushed edits.

Translate hot notes into neutral actions (label feeling → paraphrase the note → state one action), triage with a traffic‑light system (red = root issues, yellow = scene fixes, green = polish), and use brief, factual replies to the editor when you push back so the collaboration stays professional and productive.

When should I ask for a follow‑up or a second pass and what should I request?

Book a sanity check or second pass after you’ve implemented the major structural changes but before you start line editing. Typical requests are a short read of revised opening chapters, the new midpoint, and a refreshed scene map — or a targeted review of three sticky scenes to confirm direction.

Agree scope and turnaround up front (pages to submit, what the editor will read, whether queries will be answered) so the iteration is focused and avoids open‑ended hourly surprises; many editors include a capped follow‑up in their package or sell a fixed‑price sanity check.

Writing Manual Cover

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent

Get free book