Final Pre Submission Checklist: What To Check Before Hiring An Editor

Gary Smailes | 23 November 2025

Manuscript Completion Verification

Your story needs a solid three-act structure before any editor touches it. This doesn't mean following a rigid formula, but ensuring your narrative has natural beginning, middle, and ending phases that work together. Your opening should establish the world, introduce your protagonist, and present the central conflict. The middle develops complications, deepens character relationships, and builds toward crisis. Your ending resolves the main conflict while addressing the emotional journey your characters have traveled.

Look for dangling plot threads that never reach resolution. Every conflict you introduce creates a promise to readers. If your protagonist struggles with a difficult relationship, readers expect some form of resolution by story's end. If you establish a mystery, provide answers. If characters face obstacles, show how they overcome or succumb to them.

Minor subplots don't all need dramatic conclusions, but they shouldn't simply disappear either. A secondary character's romance might end with a quiet understanding rather than wedding bells, but acknowledge its resolution somehow. Readers notice when story elements vanish without explanation.

Your story's emotional arc matters as much as plot resolution. Character growth should feel complete even if their external circumstances remain complex. Your protagonist should face their deepest fears, make difficult choices, and emerge changed by the experience. This transformation doesn't require happy endings, but it needs to feel earned through story events.

Word count expectations exist for practical reasons. Publishers know what readers expect and what bookstores stock. Agents understand market realities. While brilliant writing sometimes transcends guidelines, most manuscripts need to fall within genre expectations to receive serious consideration.

Commercial fiction typically runs 80,000 to 100,000 words. Literary fiction allows more flexibility, ranging from 70,000 to 100,000 words. Romance novels usually stay between 50,000 and 90,000 words, depending on subgenre. Mystery and thriller manuscripts work best around 70,000 to 90,000 words. Fantasy and science fiction accommodate longer lengths, often reaching 100,000 to 120,000 words for debut novels.

Young adult fiction targets 50,000 to 80,000 words. Middle grade books stay shorter, around 20,000 to 50,000 words. Picture books require entirely different considerations, focusing on illustration space and reading level rather than word count alone.

Research your specific genre's current market expectations. Trends shift over time, and subgenres have different requirements. Paranormal romance accepts different lengths than historical romance. Urban fantasy differs from epic fantasy. Contemporary young adult has different needs than young adult fantasy.

If your manuscript falls significantly outside genre norms, consider whether the deviation serves your story. A 60,000-word epic fantasy might feel underdeveloped, while a 150,000-word contemporary romance could overwhelm readers. Sometimes cutting scenes improves pacing. Other times, expanding character development or world-building adds necessary depth.

Don't pad short manuscripts with unnecessary material. Filler content weakens your story and wastes readers' time. Instead, look for opportunities to deepen existing scenes, develop character relationships further, or add subplots that enhance your main theme.

For overlength manuscripts, cut ruthlessly. Remove scenes that don't advance plot or develop characters. Combine similar scenes or characters. Tighten prose by eliminating redundancy and unnecessary description. Sometimes you need to lose entire subplots, however much you love them.

Placeholder text reveals incomplete thinking about your story. Those bracketed notes like "[research medieval weapons]" or "[fix this dialogue later]" signal unfinished work. Readers won't accept TK markers or editorial comments in your final manuscript. Neither will professional editors trying to evaluate your completed work.

Research notes scattered throughout your text create similar problems. Background information you collected belongs in separate files, not embedded within scenes. Clean out author reminders, character background dumps, and world-building notes that don't belong in the narrative itself.

Incomplete scenes undermine your story's effectiveness. That chapter ending with "[finish this later]" stops your narrative momentum dead. Rushed dialogue marked "[improve this exchange]" weakens character development. Scene fragments that trail off without conclusion leave readers confused about what happened.

Address these gaps before hiring an editor. Professional editors work with completed manuscripts, not rough drafts with obvious holes. You're paying for editorial expertise, not ghostwriting services. Come to the process with your best complete effort.

Double-check scenes you wrote quickly or when struggling with inspiration. These sections often contain the most placeholder material and incomplete development. Reread them with fresh eyes, looking for logical gaps, unclear character motivations, or unfinished emotional beats.

Your opening chapter carries enormous weight in reader engagement and professional evaluation. Agents typically request opening pages in query submissions. Editors use opening chapters to evaluate your writing style and story potential. Readers decide within the first few pages whether to continue or abandon your book.

Genre establishment should happen early and clearly. Readers pick up books with certain expectations based on cover design, back-cover copy, and genre classification. Your opening pages should confirm these expectations, not contradict them. A romance novel needs romantic elements visible early. A mystery requires intrigue or crime within the opening scenes. Fantasy demands magical or supernatural elements that distinguish it from contemporary fiction.

Tone consistency between your opening and the rest of your manuscript prevents reader disappointment. A humorous first chapter followed by relentless darkness feels like bait-and-switch marketing. A serious, literary opening that gives way to lightweight entertainment confuses audience expectations.

Your protagonist needs clear, compelling goals from the beginning. Readers connect with characters who want something and face obstacles in achieving it. These goals don't need to be the story's ultimate objective, but they should drive early action and character decisions.

Strong openings introduce conflict quickly without overwhelming readers with information. Start with your protagonist facing a problem, making a decision, or dealing with change. Avoid opening with backstory, weather descriptions, or alarm clocks. Jump into action that reveals character and establishes story direction.

World-building should feel natural rather than forced in opening scenes. Don't dump exposition about your fictional setting or historical period. Instead, reveal information through character actions, dialogue, and sensory details. Trust readers to pick up context clues about your story world.

Dialogue in opening scenes should sound natural while revealing character personality and relationships. Avoid conversations that exist only to inform readers about background information. Characters shouldn't explain things they already know just for reader benefit.

Your ending needs to feel both surprising and inevitable. Readers should feel satisfied with the resolution while recognizing that earlier story events made this conclusion possible. Avoid introducing major new characters, conflicts, or plot elements in your final chapters.

New conflicts in your ending frustrate readers who expect resolution. If your romantic leads finally get together, don't introduce a new rival in the last chapter. If your detective solves the murder, don't reveal another crime that needs investigation. Save new story ideas for sequel potential rather than cramming them into your conclusion.

New characters in the ending feel like afterthoughts unless they've been mentioned or foreshadowed earlier. A long-lost relative who appears in the final scene to resolve financial problems feels contrived. A secret ally who emerges to save the day without prior setup disappoints readers who prefer earned victories.

Your ending should resonate emotionally with your story's themes. If your book explores forgiveness, show forgiveness in action during the conclusion. If you've examined sacrifice, demonstrate its consequences or rewards. Thematic resolution doesn't require heavy-handed messages, but it should feel connected to your story's deeper meaning.

Pacing in final chapters needs careful attention. Don't rush through important emotional moments or drag out action sequences unnecessarily. Give characters and readers time to process major revelations or changes. Allow emotional beats to land before moving to the next story element.

The very final scene deserves special consideration. It's your last opportunity to leave readers with a strong impression. Choose an image, emotion, or thought that encapsulates your story's essence. This doesn't mean tying up every loose thread with a bow, but rather creating a sense of completion and satisfaction.

Verification means reading your manuscript as a complete work, not as a collection of individual scenes or chapters. Pay attention to overall flow, pacing, and emotional rhythm. Does your story build momentum toward its climax? Do quieter moments provide necessary breathing space? Does the ending feel earned through everything that came before?

This completion check isn't about perfection. Professional editors will identify problems you miss and suggest improvements you wouldn't consider. But your manuscript should represent your best complete effort before you seek professional help. Think of this verification

Self-Editing Foundation Work

Two passes through your manuscript won't fix everything, but they'll catch the obvious problems that waste an editor's time and your money. Professional editors focus on deeper issues when you've already handled the surface-level mistakes you're capable of spotting yourself.

Your first pass should target big-picture story problems. Read through without stopping to fix individual sentences. Instead, look for scenes that drag, plot threads that go nowhere, and character motivations that don't make sense. Mark problems as you find them, but resist the urge to tinker with word choice or sentence structure. This pass reveals structural weaknesses that need attention before line-level editing matters.

Focus on story logic during this first read. Does your protagonist's behavior make sense given what readers know about their personality and background? Do events unfold in a believable sequence? Are character reactions proportional to the situations they face? A character who shrugs off major betrayal but explodes over minor inconvenience signals inconsistent emotional development.

Timeline errors become obvious when you read straight through. Characters who travel impossible distances between scenes, events that happen out of logical sequence, or seasonal changes that don't match story duration all create reader confusion. Keep a simple timeline as you read, noting major events and how much story time passes between them.

Your second pass should examine individual scenes and chapters. Ask hard questions about each scene's purpose. Does this conversation reveal character or advance plot? Does this action sequence increase stakes or just provide spectacle? Does this internal monologue deepen reader understanding or repeat information they already know?

Every scene should serve multiple functions. Good scenes develop character while advancing plot. They reveal information while building tension. They entertain readers while setting up future events. Scenes that accomplish only one goal often feel thin or unnecessary.

During your second pass, pay attention to pacing. Do chapters end with compelling reasons for readers to continue? Do scenes build momentum toward your story's climax? Are there natural breathing spaces between high-tension moments? Relentless action exhausts readers as much as endless introspection bores them.

Plot holes reveal themselves when you trace cause-and-effect relationships throughout your story. Character decisions should stem from established motivations and available information. Events should connect logically to previous story elements. Solutions to problems should feel earned rather than convenient.

Common plot holes include characters who know information they shouldn't have access to, problems that resolve themselves without character action, and obstacles that disappear without explanation. Characters who suddenly develop skills they've never demonstrated before, or who make decisions that contradict their established values, create logic gaps that break reader immersion.

Look for situations where characters avoid obvious solutions for no good reason. If your protagonist could solve their problem with a simple phone call, you need compelling reasons why they don't make that call. Fear, pride, incomplete information, or external obstacles all provide believable explanations, but you must establish these factors clearly.

Character inconsistencies often stem from evolving your understanding of characters during the writing process. Early chapters might portray your protagonist as shy and cautious, while later scenes show them bold and impulsive. This growth could represent character development, or it might signal inconsistent characterization that confuses readers.

Review each major character's arc throughout your story. Do their personality changes feel motivated by story events? Do their dialogue patterns and thought processes remain recognizably consistent even as they grow? Can readers trace the emotional journey that leads from their initial state to their final transformation?

Secondary characters need consistency too. Minor figures who appear sporadically throughout your story should maintain recognizable personalities and speech patterns. Readers notice when your chatty barista becomes monosyllabic without explanation, or when your protagonist's practical sister suddenly offers mystical advice.

Scenes that don't advance plot or develop characters meaningfully slow your story's momentum. These passages often result from your own discovery process during writing, where you explored ideas that ultimately didn't serve your story's needs. What felt necessary during drafting might prove expendable during revision.

Ask specific questions about questionable scenes. Do readers learn something essential about your characters? Do story events move closer to resolution? Do relationships change in meaningful ways? Does tension increase or shift in productive directions? If you answer no to all these questions, consider cutting the scene entirely.

Sometimes scenes contain valuable elements buried within unnecessary material. A conversation that reveals important character information might be surrounded by mundane small talk. A action sequence that advances plot might include excessive description that slows pacing. Extract the useful elements and incorporate them into stronger scenes.

Transition scenes pose particular challenges. Readers need to understand how characters move between locations and how time passes, but they don't need detailed accounts of every journey or mundane activity. Find the minimum information necessary to maintain story continuity, then move quickly to the next significant event.

Excessive exposition kills story momentum by stopping narrative flow to dump information on readers. This happens most often when writers feel compelled to explain background details, world-building elements, or character histories all at once. Readers prefer to discover information gradually through character actions and dialogue.

Info-dumping typically occurs in dialogue where characters explain things they already know for readers' benefit. Realistic conversations don't include comprehensive summaries of shared history or detailed explanations of familiar procedures. Characters speak in shorthand, referencing shared knowledge without spelling everything out.

Backstory interruptions often stem from writers' desire to provide context for current events. While some background information helps readers understand character motivations, lengthy flashbacks or internal monologues that halt forward progress frustrate readers who want to know what happens next.

Integrate necessary background information through character actions and current story events. Show your protagonist's difficult relationship with their father through present-day interactions rather than explaining their childhood conflicts in detail. Reveal your character's professional expertise through how they handle current challenges rather than listing their credentials and training history.

Trust readers to infer information from context. They don't need explicit explanations for everything they encounter. Skilled readers pick up character relationships, social dynamics, and world-building details from subtle cues embedded in dialogue and action.

Redundant dialogue occurs when characters repeat the same information in different conversations, or when they state things explicitly that readers already understand from context. Characters who constantly explain their feelings rather than demonstrating them through actions create flat, unrealistic exchanges.

Look for conversations that cover the same ground as previous scenes without adding new information or perspectives. Multiple characters expressing identical opinions about story events adds word count without advancing reader understanding. Instead, use dialogue to reveal different viewpoints or deepen existing conflicts.

Repetitive scenes happen when similar situations occur without escalating stakes or revealing new information about characters. Three different confrontations with the same antagonist feel tedious unless each encounter raises the stakes or changes the relationship dynamic.

Examine scenes that feel familiar. Do they echo earlier moments without adding complexity? Do they provide new obstacles or simply repeat previous challenges in different settings? Effective repetition creates patterns that reinforce themes, while ineffective repetition wastes readers' time.

Filler material includes unnecessary description, meaningless dialogue, and scenes that exist only to reach target word count. These elements feel hollow because they lack connection to your story's emotional core or narrative purpose. Readers sense when writers are marking time rather than advancing meaningful story elements.

Common filler includes extensive weather descriptions that don't affect plot, detailed accounts of routine activities that don't reveal character, and conversations about topics unrelated to story conflicts. Beautiful writing doesn't justify inclusion if it doesn't serve your story's needs.

Look for passages where you were clearly struggling with what to write next. These sections often contain circular dialogue, excessive introspection, or detailed descriptions that avoid moving story forward. Cut these passages ruthlessly, even if individual sentences demonstrate lovely prose style.

After completing both editing passes, your manuscript should feel tighter and more focused. You'll have eliminated obvious problems that would distract professional editors from helping with deeper issues. This foundation work doesn't replace professional editing, but it ensures you receive maximum value from editorial services.

Remember that self-editing has limitations. You're too close to your own work to spot every problem or evaluate your story's effectiveness objectively. Professional editors bring fresh perspectives and specialized expertise that improve your work in ways self-editing cannot achieve. But arriving at professional editing with a clean, thoughtful manuscript demonstrates professionalism and maximizes the value of editorial investment.

Technical and Formatting Standards

Technical consistency matters more than you think. Editors notice when point of view shifts randomly, verb tenses bounce around, or dialogue follows inconsistent formatting. These problems signal amateur work and distract from your story's strengths. Fix them before paying someone else to catch them.

Point of view consistency starts with understanding whose head you're in at any given moment. Third person limited means staying with one character's perspective throughout a scene. You show only what that character sees, knows, and feels. The moment you reveal another character's thoughts or knowledge, you've violated the point of view contract with your readers.

Watch for subtle POV violations that creep into many manuscripts. Your protagonist walks into a room and you write, "Sarah's face brightened when she saw him." But if you're in the protagonist's POV, he might notice Sarah's smile or hear the warmth in her voice, but he doesn't know her face "brightened" unless you've established that he reads faces well or knows Sarah particularly well.

Head-hopping within scenes creates reader confusion. If you start a scene in one character's perspective, stay there until you create a clear scene break. Readers invest in experiencing events through a specific character's consciousness. When you suddenly shift to another character's thoughts without warning, you break that connection.

Some writers attempt omniscient narration but execute it poorly. True omniscient narration requires consistent narrative voice and clear signals when moving between different characters' perspectives. If you're not comfortable managing omniscient narration, stick with third person limited or first person. These approaches force clearer perspective boundaries.

Multiple POV novels need clear transitions between different character perspectives. Chapter breaks provide natural switching points. Some writers use scene breaks within chapters, but this requires careful handling to avoid confusion. Each POV character needs distinct voice and perspective that readers recognize immediately.

First person narration eliminates many POV problems but creates others. Your narrator tells the story from their perspective, so they describe only what they experience directly. They might speculate about other characters' thoughts or motivations, but they present these as guesses rather than facts.

Verb tense consistency seems straightforward but trips up many writers. Past tense narration should maintain past tense throughout, with present tense reserved for habitual actions, general truths, or immediate dialogue. Present tense narration stays in present tense, using past tense only for events that happened before the story's current moment.

Unintentional tense shifts often occur during action sequences or emotional moments. Writers get caught up in immediate drama and slip into present tense: "John opened the door and sees the intruder standing in his living room." This shift jolts readers out of your story's flow.

Dialogue creates particular tense challenges. Characters speak in present tense even when your narrative uses past tense. But attribution and action tags should match your story's primary tense. "I'm leaving," she said, not "I'm leaving," she says, unless your entire story uses present tense narration.

Flashback sequences require careful tense management. Establish the time shift clearly, then settle into past tense for the flashback content. Don't maintain past perfect tense throughout entire flashback scenes. Use "had" constructions to establish the time shift, then switch to simple past for the duration of the sequence.

Internal thoughts in past tense narration typically stay in past tense, but some writers prefer present tense for immediate thoughts. Choose one approach and maintain consistency. "He thought the plan would work" versus "He thinks the plan will work." Both approaches work, but mixing them creates confusion.

Dialogue formatting follows specific industry standards that editors expect to see. Each speaker gets their own paragraph, even for single words. Dialogue tags and action beats follow consistent punctuation rules. Master these conventions before submitting your work.

The basic pattern places punctuation inside quotation marks for American publishing. "I'm going to the store," she said. Notice the comma before the closing quotation mark, not after. Question marks and exclamation points follow the same rule when they're part of the dialogue. "Are you coming with me?" she asked.

Action beats replace dialogue tags when you want to show character movement or reaction. "I'm going to the store." She grabbed her keys from the counter. Notice the period after "store" instead of a comma, because the action beat is a separate sentence rather than a dialogue tag.

Interruptions and trailing off require specific punctuation. Em dashes show abrupt interruptions: "I think we should—" "No." Ellipses indicate trailing off: "I suppose we could try..." Both devices lose impact when overused.

Internal thought formatting varies among publishers, but consistency matters more than specific choice. Some writers use italics for thoughts, others use regular text with tags like "he thought." Choose one method and apply it consistently throughout your manuscript.

Scene breaks and chapter divisions create structural rhythm in your story. Scene breaks within chapters typically use extra line spaces or centered symbols like asterisks or hash marks. Chapter breaks start on new pages with consistent formatting for chapter titles or numbers.

Effective scene breaks occur at natural transition points. Time shifts, location changes, or perspective switches all justify scene breaks. Readers understand that something has changed when they encounter a scene break, so use them purposefully rather than arbitrarily.

Chapter endings should provide compelling reasons for readers to continue. This doesn't mean every chapter needs a cliffhanger, but each should end at a point where readers want to know what happens next. Natural stopping points include moments of decision, revelation, or change.

Chapter beginnings should orient readers quickly after the break. Establish time, location, and character perspective within the first few paragraphs. Readers shouldn't struggle to figure out where they are or when events are happening.

Transitions between scenes and chapters require finesse. Abrupt cuts work well for dramatic effect, but overuse creates choppy pacing. Smooth transitions help readers follow story flow, but don't belabor connections that readers understand intuitively.

Standard manuscript formatting demonstrates professionalism and makes your work easier to read. Double-spacing with standard fonts like Times New Roman or Arial creates clean presentation. Twelve-point font size ensures readability without wasting space.

One-inch margins on all sides provide room for editorial notes while maintaining professional appearance. Left-aligned text rather than justified prevents awkward spacing between words. Page numbers in headers help editors reference specific passages during revision discussions.

Include your contact information and manuscript title in headers, but keep formatting simple and unobtrusive. Avoid elaborate fonts, graphics, or decorative elements that distract from your content. Editors focus on story quality, not visual presentation.

File naming conventions matter when submitting work to editors. Use descriptive names that include your last name and manuscript title. Avoid generic names like "Novel Draft 1" that provide no identifying information.

Consistent formatting throughout your manuscript shows attention to detail and respect for editorial time. An editor who spends time fixing basic formatting issues has less time to focus on improving your story. Professional presentation suggests professional attitude toward the editorial process.

These technical standards seem tedious, but they serve important purposes. Consistent formatting allows editors to focus on content rather than presentation. Proper dialogue punctuation prevents reader confusion. Stable point of view maintains story clarity. Master these elements before seeking editorial help, and you'll receive better value from professional editing services.

Remember that different publishers have specific style requirements, but industry standards provide solid foundation for most situations. When you eventually work with editors at publishing houses, they'll make final formatting adjustments according to their house style. Your job is to provide clean, professionally presented manuscripts that showcase your storytelling abilities without technical distractions.

Character and Story Consistency

Nothing destroys reader trust faster than characters who contradict themselves or stories that ignore their own rules. Readers notice when your protagonist's eyes change color halfway through the book or when your carefully established magic system suddenly works differently for plot convenience. These inconsistencies signal sloppy writing and pull readers out of your story's world.

Character sheets prevent most consistency problems before they start. Yes, this feels like homework, but it saves you from embarrassing mistakes that editors charge money to find. Document everything about your characters that matters to your story, then refer to these sheets throughout your writing process.

Physical descriptions need consistent tracking. Your heroine's hair color, height, distinguishing marks, and clothing preferences should remain stable unless your story specifically addresses changes. Readers create mental images of characters based on your initial descriptions. When you contradict those details later, you force readers to readjust their mental pictures, breaking their immersion in your story.

Age tracking becomes critical in longer narratives or stories spanning significant time periods. Characters age consistently with story events, and their behavior should reflect their actual age and maturity level. A character who acts sixteen in chapter one shouldn't sound forty-five in chapter ten unless something dramatic has happened to explain the change.

Character relationships require careful documentation, especially in complex stories with multiple characters. Family connections, romantic history, friendships, and professional relationships all need consistent tracking. Readers remember when you tell them two characters are cousins, then later refer to them as childhood friends without explanation.

Personality traits drive character actions and dialogue throughout your story. A shy character doesn't suddenly become the life of the party without story justification. A character who hates confrontation doesn't pick fights unless something significant has changed their approach to conflict. Document personality traits, then ensure character behavior aligns with established patterns.

Character motivations evolve throughout stories, but changes need clear narrative support. Your antagonist might have compelling reasons for their actions that readers don't understand initially, but those motivations should remain consistent with their character as revealed. Don't change character motivations simply because your plot needs different behavior.

Dialogue consistency reflects character background, education, and personality. A character's speech patterns, vocabulary choices, and communication style should remain recognizable throughout your story. Regional accents, professional jargon, and personal verbal tics help distinguish characters, but only when consistently maintained.

Character knowledge creates another consistency challenge. Characters know only what they've learned through story events or established background. Don't let characters suddenly possess information or skills you haven't established unless your story explains how they acquired new knowledge.

Emotional responses should align with established character psychology and story events. A character who shows extreme fear of dogs in early scenes shouldn't casually pet a strange dog later without addressing their phobia. Emotional growth and change work well in stories, but these developments need clear narrative progression.

Setting consistency requires tracking physical locations, geography, and environmental details. If your story takes place in a small town, maintain consistent details about local businesses, geography, and community layout. Readers who engage deeply with your story will notice when the coffee shop moves from Main Street to Oak Avenue between chapters.

Weather and seasonal details need consistent tracking, especially in contemporary stories. Snow doesn't appear suddenly in July without explanation, and characters shouldn't wear heavy coats in scenes you've established as taking place during a heat wave. Seasonal details help establish story timeline and atmosphere, but only when consistently applied.

Geography matters more than many writers realize. If your characters live in Chicago, they shouldn't casually drive to mountains or beaches that don't exist within reasonable distance. Research real locations or create fictional settings with consistent internal geography that makes sense to readers.

World-building consistency becomes crucial in fantasy and science fiction, but all stories benefit from clear internal logic. If your contemporary story features a specific profession, research industry details and maintain consistency about how that profession works. If your historical fiction takes place during a specific time period, ensure technology, social customs, and historical events align with your chosen setting.

Magic systems in fantasy need clear, consistent rules. Establish what magic does and doesn't accomplish in your world, then stick to those limitations. Don't let characters suddenly develop new magical abilities that solve plot problems unless you've established how magical growth works in your story. Readers appreciate magic systems with clear costs, limitations, and rules.

Technology levels require consistent tracking across genres. Your steampunk airships shouldn't randomly have modern computer systems unless your story specifically addresses technological anachronisms. Your contemporary characters shouldn't use obsolete technology without story justification.

Internal story logic governs cause and effect relationships in your narrative. Actions should produce logical consequences based on your story's established rules. Character decisions should lead to outcomes that make sense within your story world. Don't ignore logical consequences simply because they complicate your plot.

Timeline consistency prevents reader confusion about when events occur. Stories spanning days, weeks, or years need clear temporal markers that help readers follow chronological progression. Flashbacks and time jumps require careful handling to maintain temporal clarity.

Character growth and change add depth to stories, but changes need narrative justification. Document character starting points, then track development throughout your story. Character arcs should feel earned through story events rather than imposed by author convenience.

Relationship dynamics shift throughout stories, but changes should reflect character development and story events. Initial antagonism might evolve into friendship or romance, but these shifts need clear narrative progression that readers understand and believe.

Cultural and social details require consistent application throughout your story. If your characters belong to specific cultural groups or social classes, their behavior, values, and speech should reflect those backgrounds consistently. Don't apply cultural details only when convenient for plot purposes.

Research accuracy matters for credible storytelling. Whether you're writing about medical procedures, legal processes, or historical events, maintain accuracy to established facts. Readers with expertise in your story's subject areas will notice when you ignore or contradict known information.

Document everything as you write, not after you finish your first draft. Keep character sheets, setting details, and story rules easily accessible during writing sessions. This prevents inconsistencies from developing rather than forcing you to fix them later through extensive revision.

Review consistency throughout your self-editing process, not just at the end. Character and setting inconsistencies often develop gradually as stories evolve through multiple drafts. Regular consistency checks prevent small problems from becoming major revision headaches.

Remember that readers invest emotionally in consistent story worlds and characters. When you maintain consistency, readers trust your storytelling and remain engaged with your narrative. When you ignore consistency, readers notice and disengage from your story.

Professional editors catch inconsistencies during their review process, but they charge for this service. The more consistency problems your manuscript contains, the more time editors spend on basic fixes rather than helping improve your story's deeper elements. Clean up obvious consistency problems before hiring editorial help, and you'll receive better value from professional editing services.

Consistency checking takes time and attention to detail, but it's essential preparation work that improves your story's professionalism and readability. Readers deserve stories that respect their intelligence and engagement. Consistent characters and story worlds honor that relationship between writer and reader.

Professional Presentation Preparation

First impressions matter enormously in publishing. Your query letter, synopsis, and manuscript sample represent your professionalism before editors even read your story. Sloppy presentation materials suggest careless writing, while polished materials demonstrate respect for the editorial process and your own work.

Query letters serve as your manuscript's elevator pitch. Write yours as if you have thirty seconds to convince an editor why your story deserves attention. Start with your book's hook, not your personal background or writing credentials. Editors want to know what your story is about, not where you went to college or how long you've been writing.

Your opening paragraph should identify genre, word count, and story premise in clear, confident language. "My 85,000-word fantasy novel follows a reluctant dragon keeper who discovers her ability to communicate with dragons threatens an ancient peace treaty." This tells editors immediately whether your project fits their needs.

The second paragraph expands on plot and stakes without revealing every twist. Focus on your protagonist's main goal, the primary obstacle, and what happens if they fail. Think movie trailer, not Wikipedia plot summary. Give editors enough information to understand your story's appeal without spoiling key surprises.

Personal credentials belong in the final paragraph, but only include relevant information. Published short stories in your genre matter. Your degree in medieval history matters if you're writing historical fiction. Your day job as an accountant doesn't matter unless your story involves financial themes. If you have no relevant credentials, skip this paragraph entirely.

Synopsis writing challenges many authors, but these documents serve crucial editorial purposes. Editors use synopses to understand story structure, pacing, and resolution. Unlike query letters, synopses should reveal your ending and major plot developments. Think of your synopsis as a detailed roadmap rather than a teaser.

Write your synopsis in present tense, third person, regardless of your manuscript's narrative voice. Focus on main plot events and primary characters while excluding subplots and minor characters unless they directly impact the central story. Aim for one single-spaced page for novels under 100,000 words, longer for epic fantasy or complex literary fiction.

Character names should appear in ALL CAPS when first introduced, then regular text afterward. This helps editors track character relationships and story dynamics. Don't use character descriptions like "the protagonist" or "the love interest" after establishing names.

Research potential editors before approaching anyone about your project. Editorial specialization matters enormously. Romance editors understand genre conventions and reader expectations differently than literary fiction editors. Science fiction editors know current market trends and technological plausibility standards that mystery editors might miss.

Check editor websites, social media profiles, and client testimonials for genre focus, editing philosophy, and communication style. Look for editors who work with authors writing similar stories to yours. A thriller editor might excel with pacing and tension but struggle with historical accuracy requirements for your Civil War novel.

Editorial credentials vary widely, and impressive-sounding titles don't guarantee quality work. Look for editors with relevant experience rather than generic certifications. Editors who've worked with traditional publishers understand industry standards. Self-employed editors with strong client testimonials often provide excellent service. Avoid editors who guarantee publication or make unrealistic promises about your manuscript's potential.

Price research prevents unpleasant surprises and helps identify realistic editorial options within your budget. Editorial rates vary by experience level, service type, and geographic location. Developmental editing costs more than copyediting because it requires more time and expertise. Rush jobs cost premium rates because editors must rearrange schedules to accommodate urgent deadlines.

Sample chapters demonstrate your writing quality and help editors assess whether your project matches their expertise. Choose your strongest opening chapter, not necessarily chapter one. If your story starts slowly but improves dramatically by chapter three, submit chapter three for editor evaluation. You want editors to see your best work, not your weakest opening.

Format sample chapters according to standard manuscript guidelines. Double-spaced lines, one-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font, and proper scene breaks show professionalism. Include page numbers and your contact information in headers. Clean formatting allows editors to focus on your writing rather than presentation problems.

Document specific concerns about your manuscript before contacting editors. Do you struggle with dialogue? Are you uncertain about pacing in your middle chapters? Does your ending feel rushed? Specific questions help editors understand your needs and provide targeted feedback rather than generic advice.

Self-awareness about writing weaknesses demonstrates maturity and helps editors provide better service. Every writer has areas needing improvement. Acknowledging your challenges allows editors to focus attention where you need the most help. Don't apologize for weaknesses, but do identify areas where you want editorial guidance.

Timeline planning prevents rushed decisions and unrealistic expectations. Developmental editing takes longer than copyediting because it involves substantial content feedback. Complex manuscripts require more editorial time than straightforward stories. Popular editors book months in advance, especially during busy seasons like post-NaNoWriMo periods.

Budget planning should include editing costs plus potential revision time. Most professional editors offer multiple service levels at different price points. Developmental editing addresses story structure, character development, and plot issues. Line editing focuses on sentence-level clarity and flow. Copyediting catches grammar, punctuation, and consistency errors. Proofreading provides final error checking before publication.

Consider your manuscript's needs when selecting editorial services. New writers often benefit most from developmental editing that addresses story-level issues. Experienced writers might need only copyediting to polish already-strong manuscripts. Don't buy more editing than you need, but don't skimp on services your manuscript requires.

Payment terms vary among editors, but most require deposits before beginning work. Some editors offer payment plans for larger projects, while others require full payment upfront. Understand payment expectations before committing to editorial services. Budget for editing costs early in your writing process rather than scrambling to find money after completing your manuscript.

Contract terms protect both writers and editors by establishing clear expectations about deliverables, timelines, and revisions. Professional editors provide written agreements specifying service scope, completion dates, and revision policies. Read contracts carefully and ask questions about anything unclear.

Communication preferences matter for successful editorial relationships. Some editors provide detailed written feedback, while others prefer phone conversations about manuscript issues. Some respond quickly to author questions, while others prefer scheduled check-ins. Understand how your potential editor communicates before hiring them.

Portfolio examples show editorial style and expertise better than credentials alone. Request sample edits from potential editors to see their feedback approach. Some editors provide harsh criticism, while others offer gentler guidance. Choose an editorial style that motivates rather than discourages your writing development.

Reference checks provide insight into editor reliability and professionalism. Contact previous clients about their editorial experiences, focusing on communication quality, deadline adherence, and feedback usefulness. Most professional editors willingly provide client references because they're proud of their work relationships.

Availability scheduling prevents disappointment and delays. Popular editors book projects months ahead, especially during peak seasons. Contact potential editors early to discuss timeline availability rather than assuming they accept rush projects. Plan editorial timelines around your writing schedule, not arbitrary deadlines.

Professional presentation extends beyond query letters and synopses to every interaction with potential editors. Respond promptly to emails, ask thoughtful questions about services, and demonstrate respect for editorial expertise. Your professionalism influences editors' willingness to work with you and affects the quality of guidance you receive.

Remember that editorial relationships work both ways. You're hiring professional services, but you're also demonstrating your commitment to writing excellence. Present yourself as a serious writer who values professional feedback and invests appropriately in manuscript development. This attitude encourages editors to provide their best work on your behalf.

Quality Assurance Final Review

Reading your manuscript aloud reveals problems that silent reading misses. Your ear catches awkward phrasing, run-on sentences, and dialogue that sounds stilted on the page but flows naturally in conversation. When you read silently, your brain fills in missing words and smooths over rough transitions. Reading aloud forces you to experience every word your readers will encounter.

Set aside dedicated time for this process. You need concentration and patience because reading an entire novel aloud takes considerable time. Some writers spread this task over several days, reading two or three chapters per session. Others prefer marathon sessions that maintain story continuity. Choose the approach that keeps you focused and prevents rushing through important sections.

Text-to-speech software offers an alternative that catches different issues than reading aloud yourself. Computer voices read exactly what you've written without unconscious corrections. They don't add emotional inflection or natural pauses that mask awkward sentence structures. Listen while following along on screen to catch both audio and visual problems simultaneously.

Popular text-to-speech options include built-in computer accessibility features, dedicated software like Natural Reader, or online tools. Adjust reading speed to match your comprehension. Too fast and you'll miss problems. Too slow and you'll lose story flow. Most writers find medium speeds work best for catching errors while maintaining narrative momentum.

Pay attention to places where the software stumbles over pronunciation or pacing. These spots often indicate unclear writing, missing punctuation, or sentences that need restructuring. If a computer voice struggles with your text, human readers will too.

Targeted searches for personal writing weaknesses require honest self-assessment about your recurring problems. Every writer has habitual mistakes and overused words. Maybe you rely too heavily on dialogue tags like "she said softly." Perhaps you start too many sentences with "There was" or "It was." Some writers overuse specific adjectives or repeat favorite phrases throughout their manuscripts.

Create a search list based on feedback from critique partners, previous editors, or your own observations while writing. Common culprits include weak verbs (was, were, had, got), unnecessary qualifiers (somewhat, rather, quite), and repetitive sentence structures. Search for each problematic word or phrase individually and evaluate every instance.

Don't automatically delete every instance you find. Sometimes weak verbs serve specific purposes or repeated phrases create intentional rhythm. The goal is conscious choice rather than unconscious habit. Replace weak language when stronger alternatives exist, but keep effective usage that serves your story.

Word frequency analysis tools help identify overused terms you might miss manually. Programs like ProWritingAid or AutoCrit highlight repeated words and phrases throughout your manuscript. These tools show frequency counts and suggest alternatives, though you must evaluate their recommendations critically.

Look for words that appear unusually often compared to typical usage patterns. Character names should appear frequently, but descriptive words like "suddenly" or "amazing" shouldn't dominate your text. Dialogue tags need variety to avoid monotony. Action verbs benefit from diversity to maintain reader interest.

Chapter titles, character names, and location references need consistent spelling and formatting throughout your manuscript. Readers notice when Sarah becomes Sara in chapter twelve or when Oak Street transforms into Elm Avenue without explanation. These inconsistencies break reader immersion and suggest careless writing.

Create a master reference document listing character names, locations, and important details with correct spellings. Include character ages, physical descriptions, and key relationships to catch aging errors or contradictory details. Note location names, distances between places, and geographic relationships to maintain spatial consistency.

Search your manuscript for each character name and location to verify consistent usage. Pay special attention to minor characters who appear infrequently. It's easy to forget how you spelled a shopkeeper's name in chapter three when they reappear in chapter eighteen. Consistency matters even for small details because readers remember more than you expect.

File management and backup systems protect months of writing work from technical disasters. Computer crashes, corrupted files, and accidental deletions happen to every writer eventually. Multiple backup copies stored in different locations provide insurance against losing your manuscript when editors request it.

Cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive automatically sync files across devices and maintain version histories. These services let you access your manuscript from any computer while keeping backup copies safe from local hardware failures. Set up automatic syncing to save new changes without manual intervention.

Physical backup options include external hard drives, USB flash drives, or even printed copies for complete paranoia. Some writers email manuscripts to themselves for additional backup security. The specific method matters less than consistent backup habits that protect your work.

File naming conventions help manage multiple manuscript versions without confusion. Include date stamps, version numbers, or editing status in filenames. "Novel_Draft_Final_2024" tells you nothing useful, but "NovelTitle_Dev_Edit_Complete_Jan2024" provides clear version identification.

Version control becomes important when working with editors who return marked-up manuscripts. Keep original files separate from edited versions to prevent accidentally overwriting your work. Name edited files clearly so you know which editor made which changes and when they returned their work.

Story promise fulfillment requires stepping back from sentence-level details to evaluate your manuscript's overall trajectory. Your opening chapters make implicit promises to readers about genre, tone, character development, and story direction. Your ending must deliver on those promises without betraying reader expectations.

Reread your first chapter with fresh eyes. What genre signals do you send? What tone do you establish? What questions do you raise about your protagonist's journey? Now read your final chapter. Do you answer the questions you posed? Do you maintain consistent tone throughout? Does your ending feel inevitable based on your setup?

Broken promises frustrate readers more than weak writing. If your opening suggests a fast-paced thriller, your middle chapters need tension and forward momentum. If you establish romance as a central element, readers expect satisfying romantic resolution. Literary fiction promises character development and thematic depth that genre fiction might not require.

Plot threads introduced early need resolution or explanation by your ending. Mysterious artifacts mentioned in chapter two shouldn't disappear without explanation. Character goals established in your opening scenes need achievement, failure, or transformation by your conclusion. Readers track these elements subconsciously and feel unsatisfied when important details vanish.

Reader engagement measurement requires objective evaluation of your story's entertainment value. After months of writing and revision, you know your plot developments and character arcs intimately. This familiarity makes it difficult to assess whether new readers will find your story compelling or confusing.

Ask yourself hard questions about pacing and interest level. Do you have stretches where nothing significant happens? Are your character motivations clear without excessive explanation? Does each scene contribute to plot advancement or character development? If scenes serve only exposition or world-building, consider cutting or combining them with more active sequences.

Chapter endings should encourage continued reading through unresolved tension, interesting revelations, or compelling questions. Readers decide whether to continue after each chapter break. Weak endings give readers permission to stop, while strong endings create forward momentum.

Test your story's engagement by identifying places where you might stop reading if this weren't your own work. Look for natural break points where reader interest might wane. These spots need strengthening through added conflict, character development, or plot advancement.

Trust your instincts about boring sections. If you find yourself skimming during revision, readers will too. Either cut tedious passages or add conflict and tension to maintain interest. Every page should justify its existence through story contribution or character development.

Final manuscript review involves reading your entire story one last time before submitting to editors. This isn't another editing pass but a quality check to ensure everything works together cohesively. Look for flow, consistency, and overall story satisfaction rather than line-by-line corrections.

Read as a reader rather than a writer during this final review. Try to experience your story fresh, noting places where you feel confused, bored, or disconnected from characters. These reactions indicate areas that might need editorial attention even if you can't identify specific problems.

Take notes about concerns or questions during this final read-through. These observations help guide editorial discussions and ensure you address important issues during professional editing. Don't try to fix major problems at this stage, but document them for collaborative resolution with your editor.

Remember that this quality assurance process prepares your manuscript for professional

Frequently Asked Questions

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent

Leave this empty

Get free book