Self-Editing Tools Writers Actually Use (and Which to Avoid)

Self Editing Tools Writers Actually Use (And Which To Avoid)

Grammar and Style Checkers: What Works and What Doesn't

Software helps, judgment wins. Treat these checkers like assistants with sharp eyes and narrow tastes. Use them to surface patterns, then decide with your voice in mind.

ProWritingAid

Strengths:

Weakness:

Best use:

Quick pass:

  1. Open one scene.
  2. Run Echoes. If a word repeats three times within a short span, fix or vary.
  3. Check Sentence Length. Aim for a mix, short alongside long, not a uniform line of 18 to 22 words.
  4. Review Passive Voice. Keep purposeful moments, change the rest.

Example:

Tip:

Stop rule:

Grammarly

Strengths:

Weakness:

Best use:

Settings worth tweaking:

Example:

Fiction workflow:

PerfectIt

Strengths:

Weakness:

Best use:

What to track:

Simple process:

  1. Run PerfectIt on the full draft.
  2. Accept global decisions which match your house style.
  3. Update the style sheet for future books in the series.
  4. Re-run after major revisions.

Result:

Hemingway Editor

Strengths:

Weakness:

Best use:

How to read the colors:

Example:

Practical limit:

A short field test

Pick one scene today.

Then read the scene out loud. If the voice still sounds like you, the tools helped. If the voice starts to sound like a software manual, roll back. Save your voice. Use the tools to clear noise, not to steer the story.

Manuscript Organization and Tracking Tools

Organization saves drafts. Good tools make structure visible, choices trackable, and revisions less painful. Pick what fits your brain, not what looks fancy.

Scrivener

Scrivener shines when a project sprawls. The Binder keeps scenes, chapters, and research in one view. The Corkboard turns scenes into index cards. Split screen lets you compare scenes or draft while glancing at research.

Start simple.

Color helps. Use Labels for POV. Use Status for Draft, Revised, Needs work. Custom metadata keeps a timeline tight. Add fields such as Date, Location, and Onstage characters. Sort a collection by date to check continuity.

Snapshots protect lines you love. Before a heavy edit, take a Snapshot. If the new version flops, restore in two clicks.

A quick restructure drill:

Ignore Compile at first. Export to Word or PDF later. Use Scrivener for structure and drafting. That avoids the learning wall and keeps focus on the story.

Google Docs

Docs is the friend for feedback. Live comments, Suggestions mode, and Version history make group work smooth.

Set the rules before you share.

Name files with a date stamp, like “Novel v0.6 2025-03-10.” Version history lets you revert to an earlier mark if a round goes sideways.

Thread comments keep a debate tidy. Assign a comment to yourself with the checkbox. Resolve when fixed. You leave a trail of decisions without juggling email.

Docs is light on layout. That is fine for feedback rounds. For heavy formatting or submission prep, move to Word near the end. If a draft grows sluggish, split into one file per Act, then merge later.

Microsoft Word

Word is home plate for professional work. Editors expect Track Changes, Comments, and styles that behave.

Set up styles once.

The Navigation pane turns headings into a map. Click to jump chapters. Drag to reorder if your structure uses headings.

Track Changes is your ledger. Turn it on before revisions. Keep comments short and directive. Write a decision in the margin, not a debate.

Find and Replace is a scalpel.

Word bogs down with giant files. A few fixes help.

When you send to an agent or a freelance editor, follow their specs. Word makes that painless once styles are in place.

Notion or Obsidian

These tools keep worlds straight. Notion uses databases. Obsidian uses linked markdown notes. Both suit big casts, timelines, and rules that need memory.

Start minimal. Build a Series Bible, not a maze.

In Notion, create three databases:

Link Characters to Timeline. A rollup shows where a character appears and when they drop out. That reveals gaps fast.

In Obsidian, create a note template.

Use tags for arcs. For example, tag scenes with #heist or #family. The graph view will show clusters. Useful, not sacred.

Resist overbuilding. Add fields only when you need them. If you are writing a stand-alone novel with a small cast, a one-page spreadsheet likely beats a full database.

A small daily habit:

A simple workflow that balances the tools

Pick the smallest setup that supports the work. When the project grows, expand with intent. Tools serve the story, not the other way around.

Specialized Self-Editing Applications

These tools go beyond grammar fixes. Each one targets a narrow problem, and each one rewards focused use.

AutoCrit

AutoCrit studies genre norms for pacing, repetition, and dialogue tags. Run a single chapter, not the whole book. Reports highlight slow spots, overused words, and a show versus tell ratio. Treat those numbers as hints, not law.

Try this 30-minute pass:

Overuse leads to formula. Genre averages describe common practice, not your voice. Use the tool to spot extremes, then decide scene by scene.

Fictionary

Fictionary maps scenes to a story arc and tracks viewpoint, goals, stakes, and setting continuity. Setup takes time, so plan a week for input on a full novel.

Start with three moves:

For series work, Fictionary pays off. The timeline and character trackers reduce continuity drift. Data entry tempts stalling. Limit inputs to fields you use in decisions.

SmartEdit

SmartEdit runs fast and focuses on crutch words, phrase repetition, adverbs, and dialogue tags. Reports stay clear, which makes a quick scan painless.

Use the Word add-in or the desktop app.

SmartEdit does not judge context. A repeated phrase in a motif might deserve to stay. Mark phrases for review rather than deleting on sight. Less range than ProWritingAid, more speed.

Readable.com and Flesch-Kincaid

Readable.com and Flesch-Kincaid offer grade-level scoring. Useful for middle grade, YA, and accessibility goals. Less useful for literary prose.

Pick a target range. Middle grade often reads best around Grade 4 to 6. YA often lands near Grade 7 to 9. Nonfiction for general readers often sits near Grade 8.

Run a score on three sample chapters. When a chapter sits above target, try two fixes. Split long sentences. Swap rare words for plain ones where meaning allows. Keep voice and rhythm. A lower number never outranks clarity and tone.

Example:

Scores measure surface features. Meaning lives in context and content. A score helps when writing for younger readers or for accessibility reviews. For literary work, treat scores as a glance, then trust ear and test pages with real readers.

Use specialized apps in short bursts. One targeted pass per week beats endless dashboards. Pick one question, run one report, make one meaningful change.

Free and Simple Solutions That Actually Help

The best editing tools cost nothing and hide in plain sight. Writers spend hundreds on software when their computer already holds everything needed for solid revision work.

Text-to-Speech

Your computer reads aloud. Windows calls it Narrator. Mac calls it VoiceOver. Both catch problems your eyes skip.

Set up takes two minutes:

Listen for three things:

Try this exercise: Play the first page of chapter one. Mark spots where you wince or want to interrupt. Those marks show real problems.

The robot voice takes getting used to. After twenty minutes, you stop hearing the mechanical tone and start hearing your prose. Writers who resist this method miss the fastest way to catch awkward phrasing.

Find/Replace in Word

The Find/Replace box turns into a surgical editing tool when you know what to hunt.

Start with filter words. These weak phrases distance readers from action:

Search for weak verbs next:

One productive hour: Pick three crutch words from your writing. Search each one. Fix half the instances you find. Your prose tightens without losing voice.

Advanced moves work with wildcards and formatting searches. Find all instances of "ly" to spot adverb overuse. Search for quotation marks to review dialogue tags. Find all italic text to check for consistency.

Print and Red Pen

Physical pages show different problems than screens. Print chapter three. Grab a red pen. Mark anything that stops your reading flow.

Paper editing catches:

Circle words you use too often. Draw arrows to connect cause and effect. Cross out entire sentences that add nothing. The physical act of marking creates different mental engagement than clicking and typing changes.

Print every fifth chapter, not the whole manuscript. Red ink on paper costs less than software subscriptions and works better for structural problems.

Style Sheets and Checklists

A style sheet prevents the small mistakes that make manuscripts look amateur. Create a simple Word document with three sections:

Character details:

World details:

Style choices:

Update the sheet during first draft. Reference it during revision. A character with green eyes in chapter two and blue eyes in chapter twelve destroys credibility faster than plot holes.

Build checklists for common problems. Before submitting any chapter, check:

Free tools work when you use them systematically. Pick one method. Use it for a week on your current project. Master simple solutions before buying complex software.

Tools to Approach with Caution

Some tools promise speed and polish, then flatten your voice or waste your week. Use them, but keep your hands on the wheel.

AI writing assistants for editing

Helpful for ideas, weak for nuance. Feed one a scene and you often get tidy sentences, fewer quirks, and a voice that sounds like a brochure. Genre habits go missing. Humor goes beige. If you want a chorus of “As a large language model,” you know where to find it.

Use AI for:

Avoid AI for:

A quick guardrail: give it a paragraph, ask for three ways to raise tension, then close the window. Rewrite the paragraph yourself using any useful ideas, not the wording. Keep your fingerprints on every line.

Privacy matters too. If the tool stores your text, treat sensitive work with care. Redact real names. Keep key scenes offline.

Comprehensive writing suites

All-in-one packages promise plotting, character sheets, research binders, and a happy ending. The pitch sounds great. The reality often means a maze of features, hours of setup, and a file format no one else uses.

Before you commit:

If you spend more time choosing a theme than writing a paragraph, walk away. If your export breaks italics or scene breaks, walk away. You need tools that respect your time and play nice with editors and collaborators.

A simple stack beats a flashy suite. Scrivener plus Word plus a style sheet often outperforms an “everything” app.

Beta reader platforms with scoring

Stars and scores feel tidy. Fiction is not tidy. A 3.8 rating on “pacing” tells you nothing about where the drag starts or why it happens. Gamified systems reward quick takes and hot takes. Your draft needs thoughtful notes.

Build a small circle instead. Three to five readers who know your genre and will tell you the truth. Give them a short brief and a deadline. Ask targeted questions:

Collect responses in a simple form if you want structure. Google Forms works. No avatars. No scores. Real sentences only. Then meet one reader on Zoom or over coffee and talk through sticky spots. Ten minutes of conversation beats a dashboard of stars.

Expensive plotting software

Plot maps look gorgeous. Color-coded arcs. Timelines. Character heatmaps. Your brain gets a hit of progress before a single scene improves. That is the trap. The tool becomes the project.

Try a lightweight test first:

If those simple tools move you forward, keep going. If you still feel lost, identify the exact pain. Examples:

Now trial a plotting app with features aimed at that pain. Timebox it to two hours. Build only the piece you need, not the entire universe. Export to open formats and print a summary. If the tool helps you make a decision on one scene, keep it. If it sends you hunting for color palettes, delete it.

A quick rule of thumb

If a tool makes you write more and worry less, keep it. If a tool turns you into a project manager for your own novel, set it aside. Your voice pays the bills. Protect it from anything that tries to smooth off the edges.

Building Your Personal Self-Editing Toolkit

Keep it lean. Fewer tools, more pages. Start with a small stack you will use every week, then add pieces only when a problem keeps biting you.

Start minimal

Use three things:

Word or Google Docs

A simple style sheet

Create one page in Word or Docs. Headings which work:

Fill it as you write. Five minutes at the end of each session, add anything you decided. Future you will thank you during revisions and across a series.

Text-to-speech

This trio covers most line-level issues with no drama.

Match tools to the stage

Drafting

Big-picture revision

Line edit

Final sweep

Budget decisions

Free options often match paid tools for daily work. Spend money where a human brain makes a difference.

Quick test before paying

If the answer is not clear, wait a month. Write more pages. Revisit the choice with fresher eyes.

Integration workflow

Tools should work together without drama. Build a path and stick to it.

File naming

Folders

Backups

Round trips

Beta workflow

Personal rules

A simple starter kit

Use these pieces until they feel boring. Boring is good. Boring means the tools have disappeared and the work is on the page, where it belongs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which grammar and style checker is best for fiction drafts?

There’s no single best tool for every stage. Use ProWritingAid for repetition and sentence‑length reports, Hemingway as a quick readability spotlight on dense passages, Grammarly for hard grammar errors, and PerfectIt late in the process to lock hyphenation and capitalisation choices. Run each on small sections—chapter or scene level—not the entire manuscript at once.

Think of them as diagnostic tools: they surface patterns (echo words, passive voice, long sentences) but don’t replace human judgement or your authorial voice.

How do I use these checkers without flattening my voice?

Run targeted passes: pick one problem per pass (eg. ProWritingAid Echoes, then Hemingway for dense sentences). Accept objective fixes—missing words, doubled words, broken punctuation—and reject prescriptive rewrites that erase rhythm. Always read changes aloud or with text-to-speech to ensure the voice remains yours.

Keep a one-page style sheet and a custom dictionary so the tools stop flagging intentional choices and you retain creative control over dialogue, dialect and narrative texture.

When should I run PerfectIt or a consistency pass?

Schedule a PerfectIt pass on a near‑final draft, after you’ve solved structural and line issues. It excels at catching hyphenation, capitalisation and character name inconsistencies across a full manuscript and is especially useful for series work where style decisions must persist book to book.

Run it after major revisions and before handing files to a copyeditor so you present a coherent style sheet and reduce nit‑pick queries.

Which free tools actually move the needle?

Text‑to‑speech (Read Aloud) is the quickest way to hear rhythm problems and missing words. Find/Replace in Word is a surgical tool for filter words and weak verbs. Print-and-red‑pen still beats screens for spotting pacing, paragraph length and continuity slips. Pair those with a one‑page style sheet and a scene list spreadsheet for structural clarity.

Used habitually—one page read aloud, one find/replace pass per session—these free methods correct more errors than many paid subscriptions when applied consistently.

Are specialised apps like AutoCrit or Fictionary worth the time?

They’re valuable when you have a specific structural question. AutoCrit flags pacing and dialogue habits; SmartEdit and ProWritingAid find crutch words quickly. Fictionary is excellent for mapping scene function and continuity, but expect a setup time—entering scenes can take a week for a novel. Use them for one focused diagnostic pass rather than endless dashboard browsing.

Think: one targeted report per week—fix what the data shows, then move back to the manuscript. Avoid letting data become a substitute for editorial judgement.

How should I integrate tools into a practical workflow?

Keep tools stage‑specific: draft in Scrivener or Docs, use a scene list spreadsheet for big‑picture passes, move the working draft to Word for line edits (Track Changes on), run ProWritingAid/Hemingway on problem chapters, then do a PerfectIt pass as a final consistency sweep. Always finish with text‑to‑speech and a print pass before submission.

Name files clearly, keep a one‑page style sheet, and timebox experiments—try a tool for a session or two and keep what helps the manuscript move forward.

When should I stop buying tools and spend on an editor instead?

If issues repeat after multiple self‑diagnostic passes, beta readers call out the same beats, or your Act II still sags despite structural fixes, invest in a professional—developmental or structural depending on the problem. One strong editorial pass typically saves more time and expense than several software subscriptions.

Send the editor your latest draft, a one‑page scene list or beat sheet, and clear questions so they can target structure and causality rather than relitigating line edits you could have handled with the tools.

Writing Manual Cover

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent

Get free book