What to Expect When Working with a Book Editor

What To Expect When Working With A Book Editor

Editorial Stages You’ll Encounter

Every edit has a job. Mix them up, and you lose time and money. Get the order right, and the book moves forward with less thrash.

Developmental editing

This is the big-picture pass. Structure, plot, pacing, character arcs, point of view, and theme. Expect a lengthy editorial letter plus margin queries that point to exact pages.

What you receive:

A short example from a letter:

How to know you need this stage:

One quick exercise:

Line editing

Now the sentences. Style, tone, rhythm, and clarity. The goal is flow, voice, and meaning, not grammar policing. Expect a Track Changes file full of trims, reorders, and queries.

Before and after:

What you receive:

How to know you need this stage:

A quick test:

Copyediting

Mechanics and consistency. Grammar, punctuation, usage, continuity, and style decisions. Expect edits aligned to Chicago Manual of Style and Merriam-Webster, plus a style sheet.

What you receive:

Sample style sheet entries:

How to know you need this stage:

Proofreading

The last check after typesetting or layout. Typos, formatting slips, bad word breaks, page numbers, header consistency. No new wording here.

What you receive:

How to know you need this stage:

A common misstep:

Why one edit rarely does everything

Each stage solves a different problem. If you hire a “do it all” pass, you pay for sentence polish on chapters that might later get cut. Or you enforce commas on a scene that should not exist. Smart sequencing saves you.

A simple order for most books:

Different editors often handle different rounds. Specialists bring sharper eyes. If you prefer one person across two stages, ask how they separate passes in time and mindset.

How to pick the stage you need now

Use this checklist:

Two mini self-tests:

What deliverables look like, stage by stage

A quick story from the trenches

An author brought me a 90,000 word thriller with a fresh copyedit. Gorgeous commas. No engine in Act Two. We paused the polish, did a developmental pass, cut a subplot, and raised the stakes. Then line, then a light copyedit. Same budget as the endless tinkering they had planned, fewer weeks wasted, stronger book. Order matters.

Final note for your timeline

Do not jump to copyediting before story structure is stable. Fixing commas on scenes you will cut is a tax on your future self. Identify the level you need now. Book that stage, do the work, then move forward. Your pages will thank you.

Onboarding, Scope, and Clear Agreements

The intake process sets the tone for everything. Skip steps here, and you will spend weeks untangling misaligned expectations later.

The intake brief

Your editor needs context to quote and plan the work. Expect questions about genre and subgenre, word count, comparable titles, target reader, your biggest concerns, timeline, and publishing path.

Sample intake questions:

Why these details matter:

Genre affects pacing expectations. Romance readers want different beats than thriller fans. Word count signals scope and complexity. Comparable titles help the editor gauge your market awareness and style goals. Target reader shapes voice and content notes. Pain points focus the edit on your biggest concerns. Timeline determines availability and rush fees. Publishing path affects style choices and polish level.

A quick example of how details change the approach:

Sample edits and diagnostics

Many editors offer a paid sample edit on 1,000 to 2,000 words or a manuscript diagnostic before you book the full project. This step confirms fit and scope.

What a sample edit includes:

What a diagnostic includes:

Both options cost money, typically $200 to $500. Worth it if you are choosing between editors or unsure about scope. Not necessary if you have a referral and clear project parameters.

A story from experience:

An author requested a developmental edit quote. The diagnostic revealed the structure worked well, but the prose needed line editing. We redirected the focus and saved three weeks of revision time. The upfront diagnostic fee paid for itself in avoided rework.

Quote breakdowns and deliverables

Your quote should itemize what you receive, not just list a total price. Ask for specifics.

Standard deliverables to expect:

Sample quote breakdown:

Contract essentials

Professional editors work with contracts. Expect coverage of timeline, rate structure, deposit terms, milestone payments, rush fees, confidentiality, and intellectual property.

Timeline terms:

Rate structure:

Deposit and milestones:

Confidentiality and IP:

Red flags in contracts:

Technical choices you will make

Your editor will ask about English variant, file format, and reference materials. These decisions affect the editing process and final product.

English variant options:

File format choices:

Reference materials:

Sample conversation about definitions

You and your editor should align on what each service includes. These definitions vary between professionals.

Author: "What does your developmental edit include?"

Editor: "Structure, character arcs, pacing, point of view, and theme. I provide an 8-12 page letter plus margin queries. I do not line-edit sentences or copyedit grammar in this pass."

Author: "What about a second pass?"

Editor: "After you revise based on my letter, I will read the revised manuscript and provide a shorter follow-up letter, usually 2-4 pages, focusing on how well the revisions

The Editing Workflow and Timeline

The editing process follows a predictable rhythm. Understanding the flow helps you prepare mentally and logistically for each phase.

The standard workflow

Most professional edits follow this sequence: kickoff call, full manuscript read, editing pass with queries, editorial letter, author revision period, optional second pass, then transition to the next editorial stage.

Kickoff call

Your editor reviews the intake brief and discusses project goals. Expect questions about specific concerns, style preferences, and timeline constraints. This call lasts 15 to 30 minutes and sets expectations for the work ahead.

Sample kickoff topics:

Full manuscript read

Your editor reads the entire manuscript before making any changes. This prevents early chapters from receiving heavy edits while later chapters get light treatment. The read-through also helps identify patterns and recurring issues.

During this phase, your editor takes notes on:

Editing pass with margin queries

After the full read, your editor works through the manuscript systematically, adding comments and suggestions. Developmental editors focus on story structure. Line editors concentrate on sentence-level craft. Copyeditors address grammar and consistency.

Margin queries serve different purposes:

Editorial letter

The letter summarizes big-picture findings and provides a roadmap for revision. Developmental letters run 6 to 15 pages and address structure, character, pacing, and theme. Line editing letters focus on style, voice, and sentence-level patterns. Copyediting letters highlight consistency issues and style guide decisions.

A strong editorial letter includes:

Author revision period

You receive the edited manuscript and letter, then plan your revision approach. Most authors need time to process the feedback before diving into changes. Professional editors expect this adjustment period and build it into project timelines.

Optional second pass

After substantial revision, many editors offer a follow-up review of changed sections. This second pass confirms that revisions addressed the original concerns and identifies any new issues introduced during revision.

Timeline expectations by editing type

Editing speed depends on manuscript complexity, editor workload, and scope of work. These ranges reflect industry norms for professional editors working at sustainable pace.

Developmental editing timelines

Line editing timelines

Copyediting timelines

Proofreading timelines

Why editors explain their suggestions

Good editors teach while they edit. Margin queries include the reasoning behind suggestions, helping you understand craft principles and apply lessons to future writing.

Generic feedback: "This scene drags."

Teaching feedback: "This scene serves two purposes: developing Sarah's relationship with her sister and revealing the family secret. The relationship development works well, but the secret reveal gets buried in dialogue about dinner plans. Consider moving the revelation to a more prominent position or creating a separate scene focused on that discovery."

Generic feedback: "Awkward sentence."

Teaching feedback: "The subject here is 'attempts,' but the sentence structure makes it sound like 'Sarah' is the subject. Try: 'Sarah's attempts to reconcile with her mother failed' instead of 'Sarah attempted to reconcile with her mother, but her attempts failed.'"

This approach helps you recognize similar issues independently and reduces repetitive problems in future drafts.

Style sheets and documentation

Professional editors create style sheets tracking decisions about spelling, hyphenation, capitalization, character details, timeline, and stylistic conventions. You receive this sheet with your edited manuscript.

Spelling and hyphenation choices

Character and setting details

Timeline tracking

Style conventions

Tools and technology

Most professional editors work in Microsoft Word with Track Changes enabled or Google Docs with Suggesting mode. These platforms provide robust commenting systems and revision tracking.

Microsoft Word advantages

Google Docs advantages

Additional editor tools

Some editors supplement standard word processors with specialized software:

Communication and check-ins

Professional editing relationships thrive on clear communication. Establish preferences early and stick to agreed response times.

Standard check-in schedule

Response time expectations

How to flag problems

Contact your editor immediately if:

Preparing for the editing phase

Calendar blocking

Reserve time for:

File management system

Establish clear naming conventions before the edit begins:

Backup strategy

Managing expectations during longer projects

Extended editing projects require patience and trust in the process. Your editor balances quality with efficiency, but

Working with Feedback Without Losing Your Voice

You hold the pen. Always. Accept, reject, or adapt every suggestion. A good editor aims to sharpen meaning and rhythm, not replace your style with theirs.

What feedback looks like

Feedback tends to land in three layers.

Each layer serves a reader outcome. Clear story. Clean prose. Smooth reading.

Friction without flames

Some notes will sting. That is normal. Productive disagreement keeps your voice alive.

Trade positions for goals. Instead of "I like this sentence," try "I want Claudia to sound guarded here." Invite a path forward. "If the rhythm feels flat, point me to the clause you think holds the weight."

A quick script for tricky moments:

Stick with specifics, not vibes.

What makes feedback useful

Vague: "Make this punchier."

Specific: "Cut the preamble in the first three lines, open with the decision, then tuck the context after the second sentence."

Vague: "Character feels off."

Specific: "Jonas threatens the clerk here, yet earlier chapters frame him as conflict-avoidant. Either seed a temper earlier or switch this to quiet pressure."

Ask for rationale when a note feels off. Good editors explain the why, not only the what. You learn faster, and your next draft arrives stronger.

Guard your voice without getting defensive

Know your non‑negotiables. Maybe your narrator keeps blunt fragments. Maybe humor leans dry. Tell your editor. Put it in the brief and again before line work begins.

Quick voice audit:

During revision, read a page aloud. If your ear says, "Sounds like me," you are on track. If the rhythm goes flat, revert or revise further.

Avoid "Accept All." Triage.

The emotional cycle

First reaction often looks like defensiveness or fatigue. Let it pass.

A simple plan:

Give yourself permission to feel weird about cutting a line you adored. Keep it in a scrapbook file. Future you might recycle it in a better spot.

Build a revision roadmap

Open the editorial letter. Translate notes into tasks.

Work in passes. First, big moves. Reorder scenes, cut subplots, raise stakes, repair timeline. Only once structure feels solid should you touch line rhythm. Mechanics last.

Communicate through the process

If a note puzzles you, respond inside the comment thread with a specific question. "I see the pacing flag. Which part drags more for you, the backstory paragraph or the exchange with the neighbor?" This invites a focused answer and saves time.

If you disagree, show your work. "I kept the long sentence here to hold breath until the reveal. I trimmed two modifiers to keep pace while preserving the rush." Most editors will nod and move on.

Keep decisions visible

Create a running style and decision log. Two pages do the trick.

Share this log with your editor before line work. Fewer back‑and‑forths, tighter consistency, fewer late surprises.

Small exercises to stay you

A last word on control

You steer. Editors bring experience, pattern spotting, and options. Your voice carries the story across the finish. Use feedback as a lens, not a replacement. Take what serves the reader you want, leave what dulls your sound, and document choices so the next stage goes smoother.

Revisions, Deliverables, and Next Steps to Publication

Developmental edits are not the finish line. They are the blueprint for your rebuild. Before you touch sentences, plan a substantive pass. Structure first. Then style. Then mechanics.

Plan the big revision

Treat the edit letter like a project brief.

Do not slide into line tweaks while scenes still move around. Every early polish adds cost later. Every early polish also risks new continuity errors.

Use the support window wisely

Many editors include short post‑delivery support. Often one to two weeks. Sometimes a discounted second look on revised pages. Confirm terms before you start revising.

Use the window for focused questions.

If your package includes a call, arrive with an agenda. Three priorities, tops. Share pages in advance when possible.

Post‑edit checks before the next stage

Once big fixes land, sweep for alignment.

When structure feels stable and your style sheet reflects the new draft, move to line or copyediting.

Prepare for proofreading

Proofreading checks typos and layout hiccups. No new wording. To make it work, proof on designed pages or a near‑final PDF or epub.

Adjacent services worth lining up

Different books need different partners. Here is a quick map.

Build these into your schedule. Leave room for fixes that flow from each report.

What editors do not promise

Editors shape the manuscript. They do not guarantee an agent, sales, or reviews. Marketing sits outside most editorial contracts. If you want help with pitches, ad copy, or outreach, book those services separately.

Version control and handoff

Keep your files tidy.

Build your production schedule backward

Open your calendar. Pick a launch date. Now build steps in reverse. A sample for an 80k novel follows. Adjust for your project.

Add buffers. Vendors reschedule. Life interrupts. A two‑week cushion saves stress.

Quick checklist before you move on

One stage at a time. Keep your voice steady, your records clean, and your timeline honest. The book will thank you on the shelf.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I include in a one‑page editing brief so editors can quote accurately?

Include genre and subgenre, target reader, exact word count and file format, a two‑sentence pitch, two or three comp titles with a short fit note, your biggest pain points (for example “sagging middle” or “POV drift”), desired stage (developmental, line, copyedit or proofread) and your ideal start date. That one‑page editing brief helps editors give per‑word equivalents and realistic timelines rather than guessing.

How do I decide whether to book a developmental edit, line edit, copyedit or proofreading?

Use simple tests: if you can’t pitch the book in one sentence or beta readers report “low stakes” or a slow middle, start with a developmental edit. If the story works but sentences trip the reader, you need line editing. If you’re happy with voice and structure but need consistency, choose copyediting. Book proofreading only on designed pages or a near‑final PDF to catch layout and typographic issues.

Why commission a paid sample edit and what should I expect from it?

A paid sample edit (typically 1,000–2,000 words from the same chapter) shows an editor’s actual approach under normal turnaround conditions. Expect Track Changes edits, margin queries that explain the why, and a short diagnostic note; evaluate samples for voice preservation, concrete rationale and teachable comments rather than generic praise.

What deliverables should I insist on for each editorial stage?

Typical deliverables: developmental edits include a 5–15 page editorial letter plus margin queries and a revision plan; line edits return a Track Changes file with pattern notes; copyedits supply a corrected file plus a style sheet (very useful for series work); proofreading provides a marked PDF and an errata list. Specify these in the contract so you know what you’ll receive at each stage.

What are realistic timelines for developmental, line, copyediting and proofreading work?

Timelines vary with length and complexity: an 80,000‑word developmental edit typically takes 3–6 weeks; a line edit 3–4 weeks; copyediting 2–3 weeks; and proofreading on designed pages perhaps 3–5 days for a 200‑page book. Always confirm the editor’s current availability and add buffers—editors who promise impossibly fast turnarounds (full novel in 48 hours) are a red flag.

How do I protect myself from hidden fees and unclear contract terms?

Ask for an itemised quote with a per‑word equivalent, explicit definitions for “heavy edit” and rush fees, milestone payments, deposit terms, revision windows and a cancellation/refund policy. Insist on a signed contract that states you retain IP and spells out confidentiality, file retention and portfolio use; if an editor refuses a written agreement or dodges surcharge triggers, walk away.

How can I work with editorial feedback without losing my voice?

Set non‑negotiables in the brief and give your editor a page that exemplifies your desired voice. Triage edits when reviewing: green for easy accepts, yellow to test, red for voice risks. Ask for reasons when a suggestion feels off—good editors teach their rationale—then read edits aloud to check whether the rhythm still sounds like you before accepting changes.

Writing Manual Cover

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent

Get free book