Common Book Proposal Mistakes And How To Fix Them

Common Book Proposal Mistakes and How to Fix Them

Positioning and Overview Mistakes

The overview sits on the front porch of your proposal. Editors decide whether to walk inside within a page or two. Make the promise sharp, the timing obvious, and the scope clean. No fog, no hedging.

Stop selling to “everyone”

A book for everyone lands with no one. Narrow the promise to one core reader and one outcome.

Use this one-sentence frame:

For [specific reader], this book delivers [core outcome] by [unique approach].

Examples:

Mini-exercise:

Prove “why now” and “why you”

Editors invest in timing and authority. Show both.

“Why now” examples:

“Why you” examples:

Pull in one to three timely data points. Name sources when possible. Two lines of credibility, then move on.

Lead with a hook, not throat clearing

Open with something specific and testable. Surprise wakes up decision makers.

Hook options:

Place the hook in line one or two. Promise, then deliver proof in the samples.

Define scope and structure early

Scope prevents panic in acquisitions meetings. Name the size of the project and the guts of the package.

Include:

One paragraph covers all of this. Use numbers. Numbers calm risk.

Title and subtitle, clarity over clever

A clever title pleases friends. A clear title pleases buyers.

Quick test:

Examples:

Aim for market-facing words in the subtitle. Lead with the outcome, then the approach.

Build the overview in a clean sequence

Follow a simple arc. Short pieces in a logical order win trust fast.

Use this sequence:

  1. Overview paragraph with the hook and promise.
  2. One-sentence positioning statement.
  3. One sentence on the primary reader.
  4. Market gap paragraph with two or three comps and where this book fits.
  5. Proof-of-concept examples. Mini case studies, pilot results, early endorsements, or letters of interest.
  6. Brief chapter arc. One to two lines per part, plus one line on features, length, and delivery.

Example sketch:

Common fixes, fast

Mini-exercise, 15 minutes:

Clean positioning lowers friction for sales, marketing, and editorial. A tight overview signals focus and follow-through. Deliver clarity here, and the rest of the proposal gains momentum.

Market Research and Comparable Titles Errors

Comparable titles tell an editor two things. Where your book sits. How it sells. Get the comps wrong, and the room loses confidence before anyone reads your sample.

Stop saying there is no competition

If you say "no competition," you just told me you have not looked. Every sellable idea has neighbors.

Do this:

Mini-exercise, 20 minutes:

Mix your comps

Only mega-bestsellers signal wishful thinking. Only obscure titles signal a small market. You need both reality and aspiration.

Aim for:

For a book on managing remote engineers, a healthy set might look like:

Write analysis, not cheerleading

"Mine is better" is not analysis. Compare in neutral terms. Focus on angle, scope, tone, structure, and reader promise.

Use this simple language:

Then state your edge in one line. Narrower audience. Fresher data. New framework. Stronger how-to. Different delivery.

Example comps, written the right way:

Notice the tone. No snark. No hype. Clear overlap. Clear difference.

Read the sales signals

Editors need to know whether readers buy in this slice of the market. You are not expected to audit exact numbers. Directional proof helps.

Useful signals:

List one or two signals per comp. Note the date. Keep it clean.

Choose BISAC and shelving with intent

BISAC codes tell retailers where to shelve the book. The wrong code will bury you. Pick the codes your reader browses and searches.

Steps:

If your book belongs in two places, say so. "Primary, Parenting / Special Needs. Secondary, Education / Speech Pathology." Shelf clarity helps sales reps and algorithms do their jobs.

Your comp template

Use a fixed format so your analysis is easy to skim.

For each comp:

Two quick models: