When It’s Okay To Tell (And When It Isn’t)

When It’s Okay to Tell (and When It Isn’t)

Why Telling Exists (and What It Really Is)

Let's clear up a persistent myth first: good fiction writers tell all the time. They just tell well.

The "show don't tell" rule has scared writers into believing that every emotion needs a clenched jaw, every piece of backstory requires a flashback scene, and every time transition demands a blow-by-blow account. This leads to bloated manuscripts where characters spend three pages getting dressed and two chapters driving to work.

Telling exists because stories need architecture, not just decoration.

Telling as narrative compression

Think of telling as your story's fast-forward button. It compresses time, bridges scenes, and delivers context without dramatizing every mundane moment.

Good telling sounds like this:

By Thursday, the entire office knew about the audit. Conversations stopped when Margaret passed cubicles, and the break room emptied whenever she needed coffee.

That paragraph covers three days of office politics without staging a single water cooler scene. The telling delivers crucial context: Margaret's isolation, the speed of workplace gossip, and rising tension. It sets up the next scene without wasting reader patience on repetitive small talk.

Bad telling sounds like this:

Margaret felt nervous about the audit situation. People were avoiding her because they thought she was responsible for the investigation. She was sad and frustrated about being treated like an outcast.

The difference lies in specificity and consequence. Good telling shows results. Bad telling explains feelings.

The pacing partnership

Showing slows time. Telling accelerates it. Skilled writers alternate between these speeds to control reader experience.

Use showing for moments that matter: confrontations, revelations, first kisses, final decisions. These scenes need breathing room. Readers want to inhabit the moment alongside your characters.

Use telling for transitions, aftermath, and setup. After a dramatic breakup scene, you might write: She spent the weekend deleting photos and returning borrowed books. By Monday, the apartment looked like he'd never existed. This telling compresses the healing process without staging every box-packing moment.

Consider this sequence:

The interview lasted fifteen minutes. Patricia answered questions about quarterly projections while her mind catalogued exit routes. When the CEO leaned forward and smiled, she knew she'd gotten the job she didn't want.

The first sentence tells (compresses time). The second sentence shows internal experience during the compression. The final sentence blends telling and showing to reveal character psychology and plot development.

Scope management through summary

Novels cover weeks, months, or years of story time. Showing every significant moment would create 2,000-page manuscripts. Strategic telling allows writers to maintain scope without losing readers.

Epic fantasies might summarize: The siege lasted three months. By winter's end, both armies had learned to measure victory in surviving another day.

Romance novels might compress: They texted daily through September, messages growing longer and more personal until Emma found herself rushing home to read David's latest update.

Historical fiction might bridge decades: The war years blurred together, marked by rationing queues and brief letters from overseas. When peace came, it arrived quietly, like a rumor no one dared believe.

Each example covers significant time while highlighting emotional truth. The telling serves the story's needs rather than fighting against them.

Narrative distance and intimacy

Here's where most writers stumble: they think telling means stepping away from their characters. Not true.

Distant telling sounds like a textbook: Margaret was a middle manager who had worked at the company for five years. She was experiencing stress due to the pending audit.

Intimate telling sounds like your character thinking: Five years at Fletcher & Associates, and this was how they repaid her loyalty. An audit with her signature all over the suspicious accounts.

The difference lies in narrative distance. Free indirect discourse lets you tell through your character's perspective, vocabulary, and emotional state. The facts get delivered, but they wear your character's personality.

Watch how Colson Whitehead handles this in The Underground Railroad:

Cora had been on the plantation for six months. Long enough to understand that the cotton was king and she was but a subject in its kingdom.

That's telling, but it feels intimate because it carries Cora's growing awareness, her metaphorical thinking, and her sense of powerlessness. The exposition becomes character development.

When telling beats showing every time

Some information works better summarized than staged:

The yellow highlighter test

Here's your diagnostic tool: print one chapter of your manuscript. Highlight every summary sentence in yellow. Now ask three questions about each yellow line:

  1. Does this compress time efficiently?
  2. Does this clarify stakes or context readers need?
  3. Does this orient readers in story or emotional landscape?

If a summary sentence does none of these jobs, cut it or convert it to showing. If it does one job well, keep it. If it does two jobs, celebrate your efficiency.

Good telling works hard. It advances plot, develops character, and maintains momentum. Bad telling just fills space between the scenes you actually wanted to write.

Most commercial fiction runs about 70% showing, 30% telling. Literary fiction might lean more toward showing for emotional depth. Thrillers might use more strategic telling to maintain breakneck pace. Genre expectations matter, but the fundamental principle holds: use each tool for what it does best.

Remember this: readers don't notice good telling because it feels necessary, natural, and transparent. They notice bad telling because it stops story momentum and explains what they'd rather experience.

Your job is to tell when telling serves the story and show when showing serves the reader. Master both tools, and your fiction will breathe with natural rhythm instead of gasping through endless demonstrations of every minor plot point.

A Decision Framework: Show vs Tell in Practice

You need a quick test when your fingers hover over a scene. Show or tell. Here is a framework you can run in under a minute and defend on revision day.

The Stakes–Novelty–Tempo filter

Ask three questions.

Examples:

If the answer lands in the middle, weigh the ties. Stakes beat novelty. Tempo matters only after the first two.

Scene vs summary map

Scenes earn their real estate with conflict, choice, and consequence. Two people with opposing goals. A decision that alters the path. A result that changes what follows. If a beat holds all three, show.

Summaries handle work that supports scenes.

A fast check for scenes: if nothing shifts, you wrote stage business, not a scene. Either add friction or move to summary. Your reader will thank you.

POV limits

Point of view sets your boundaries. If the narrator would not know a fact, do not state it as truth. Show what a viewpoint can observe. Let inference do the work.

Wrong: He lied about seeing the keys.

Better: He blinked, touched his throat, and repeated, Keys? His voice came thin.

Wrong: The senator felt guilty over the bill.

Better from her chair: The signature looked smaller this time. She slid the folder under a stack and turned the photo on her desk face down.

You keep authority when each line honors access. First person and deep third invite free indirect style. Let summary borrow the character’s words, rhythms, and bias. Closeness rises, even while time compresses.

Flat: The meeting lasted an hour and included budget numbers.

Close: An hour of slides and buzzwords. Then the number that hit like a cold sponge to the face.

The fact stands. The voice carries it.

Genre expectations

Each shelf trains readers to expect a mix.

Write to promise, not to formula. Your ratio shifts with voice and story, yet readers on each shelf still expect high-emotion beats on the page.

A quick triage tool

Label each beat S, T, or X.

Run this on a sample:

Draft: Nora drives to the hospital. Traffic is slow. She thinks about her mother. She parks. She goes in. The nurse tells her visiting hours are over. Nora argues. The nurse refuses. Nora begs. The nurse lets her in anyway.

Triage:

Now revise to match the labels. A tighter version:

She hit every red on Mission and rehearsed sorry like a prayer. Inside, the clock over the desk read 8:02. Too late. The nurse shook her head. Rules. Nora set her palms on the counter and told the truth she had avoided for a year. The nurse took a breath, checked the hall, and waved her through.

The outcome lands. The drive compresses. The parking lot disappears. This is the job.

One-minute checklist

Final step. Run a fresh page through the filter. Mark S, T, or X in the margin. Adjust until each scene turns the wheel and each summary earns its line.

Smart, Purposeful Uses of Telling

Telling has a job. Give it the right shifts and your scenes breathe. Use it to move, to orient, to shape pattern. Then get out of the way and drop into heat when it counts.

Transitions and time jumps

Readers do not need a play-by-play of empty hours. They need bearings. One vivid line, then move.

The trick is specificity. One concrete detail signals whole stretches of time. If a line reads like a calendar entry, sharpen it. If a line plants a smell, a texture, or a number, keep it.

Quick test. If you can picture the line, it works. If you only see the word time, try again.

Recaps without repetition

When a character updates others, readers already know the facts. Do not replay the prior scene. Fold it into one sentence and aim for tone.

You can layer bias without pages of dialogue. Use verbs with flavor. Told, confessed, glossed, bragged, dodged. One word steers the recap and says more than five paragraphs of rehash.

Montage and overview

Montage shows pattern and change. You compress with a few sharp beats, each with a hook of detail.

Aim for cause and effect. One action ripples into the next. Without cause, a montage feels like a list. With cause, readers sense motion.

Efficient backstory and worldbuilding

Use one sentence when it reframes a choice on the page. Not before. Not in a lump. Right at the moment of decision.

You anchor the present with a single past fact. If the line does not change how a reader reads the next action, delete it. Front-loaded history stalls story. Sprinkled context sharpens it.

Voicey omniscient or memoir reflection

Authorial commentary works when it has a persona and a point. Keep it brief, biased, and tied to what is happening now.

Omniscient with bite:

Memoir with hindsight:

The line earns space when it adds meaning, not summary. One sentence, then return to the scene.

How to keep telling tight

Flat: The next two weeks were busy and stressful.

Sharper: Two weeks of forms and hold music. By payday, her jaw clicked when she chewed.

Flat: He told them everything that happened at the pier.

Sharper: He told them about the pier. The shouting, the splash, the hat left on the cleat.

Action

Draft three elegant summary lines for your book.

Now swap in your strongest line for a filler scene. Read the chapter aloud. If the rhythm lifts and the next scene arrives faster, you picked well. If not, tune the detail or the verb and try again.

When Telling Weakens Story—and How to Fix It

Telling goes slack when it explains what readers want to feel, or when it lectures. You lose heat, and tension leaks out. The fix is not always a full scene. Often it is one sharper line, one concrete cue, one consequence.

Labels, moralizing, and explained subtext

Emotion labels skip the body. Moralizing skips the reader’s mind. Both short-circuit engagement.

Flat

Stronger

You are not a therapist. You are a guide. Give readers behavior, texture, and choice. Let them draw the line.

Quick fix

“As-you-know” and other lecture moves

Info-dumps flatten pace and crowd out drama. A page of backstory reads like homework. Readers want what matters to the scene in front of them.

Tired

Sharper

Feed context through action. A prop in motion beats a paragraph. If readers already know the event, recap in one line with flavor and move on.

Filters, adverbs, and passive phrasing

Filter verbs shove a pane of glass between readers and the moment. Adverbs prop up weak verbs. Passive voice hides agency.

Filtered

Direct

Adverb-heavy

Stronger

Passive

Active

Audit one page for saw, heard, noticed, realized, felt, seemed, thought. Cut five. Replace with what the character experiences in real time.

Spoiler tells and cheap foreshadowing

“Little did he know” steals tension. If you announce the future, readers lean back. Give them a breadcrumb instead.

Spoiler

Foreshadow with evidence

Spoiler

Foreshadow with clue

Plant proof. A receipt in the bin. Mud on one tire. The dog that never barks at strangers, silent this time. Readers want to predict, not be told.

Fix it on the page

Here are five common tells with fast conversions. Use these as patterns.

  1. Emotion label to visceral cue

    • Label: She was nervous during the interview.
    • Cue: Her heel drummed under the chair. The pen left teeth marks.
  2. Info-dump to props-in-action

    • Dump: The lock is a vintage five-pin tumbler model used in the seventies.
    • Action: She held up five picks, shrugged, and the lock gave on the third try.
  3. Replay to single-line recap

    • Replay: Then she told Javier everything about the break-in, including the broken window, the neighbor, the sirens, the blood on the sill.
    • Recap: She gave Javier the short version, glass and sirens and the neighbor who saw nothing.
  4. Filter to direct perception

    • Filter: He noticed smoke coming from the vent.
    • Direct: Smoke threaded from the vent, blue and thin.
  5. Authorial explanation to consequence

    • Explanation: He kept lying because he needed control.
    • Consequence: He checked her messages when she showered and smiled at the empty inbox.

A quick triage for weak telling

Action

Convert five tells today.

Read the fixes aloud. If you feel the scene pull you in, keep them. If the line still explains, push once more toward what a camera would catch and what a conscience would flinch from.

Make Telling Read Like Showing

Summary does not have to feel thin. Pack it with detail, bias, and motion. Readers will feel the scene even while you fast-forward.

Load summaries with specificity and cause and effect

General summary floats. Specific summary lands, then moves.

Flat

Charged

Aim for three moves in one sentence or short burst.

Try this line pattern

Anchor then glide

Open with something you could photograph. Glide through compressed events. Land on a hook.

Example

Another

You set the frame, move the clock, then point to the next beat. Readers track time and tension without a stop-and-start scene.

Use free indirect discourse for intimacy

Let the summary wear the character’s mouth. Same facts, different charge.

Neutral

In her head

Neutral

In the detective’s head

Notice the lexis. Bias does the work. No need to say she felt annoyed or he thought it was unfair. The voice carries judgment inside the summary line.

Quick switches that help

Braid exposition into action

Facts go down easy when they ride a task, an obstacle, or a desire.

Instead of

Try

Instead of

Try

Instead of

Try

The fact arrives inside friction or choice. No lecture, no halt.

Calibrate ratios in revision

Most commercial stories breathe well near a 70 to 30 split, scene to summary. Mark one chapter. Label each paragraph S for scene or T for summary. Add them up. Adjust with intent.

If you need more oxygen, shift some T into S at turning points. Put the decision on the page. If tension sags, fold a routine S into one clean T. Preserve the beat, not the blow-by-blow.

Watch for these red flags

And these bright spots

Mini drills

Action

Line edit one page of summary.

Example endings

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes "good telling" different from "bad telling"?

Good telling compresses time or supplies context while carrying specificity, consequence and voice; it shows results rather than explaining feelings. Bad telling explains motives or names emotions without anchoring them in sensory detail or action, which stalls reader engagement.

When you revise, turn a bland summary into a short, charged line that includes a precise noun or a sensory hook so the telling reads like scene architecture rather than authorial lecture.

When should I tell instead of show?

Use the Stakes–Novelty–Tempo filter: show when stakes are high, information is new or tempo should slow; tell when stakes are low, the material is familiar, or you need to compress hours, travel or routine. Genre expectations also influence the balance.

If a beat contains conflict, choice and consequence it earns a scene; otherwise a vivid summary or single line will usually serve better and keep your story moving.

How can I make telling read like showing—keeping intimacy while compressing time?

Anchor then glide: open a summary with a photographable detail, glide through compressed beats with two or three sharp specifics, and land on a hook that points to the next scene. Use free indirect discourse so the summary carries the character’s vocabulary and bias.

That way you compress time with vivid summary and narrative distance that still feels intimate because the facts wear the character’s point of view rather than a neutral lecturing voice.

What quick tools reveal weak telling in my manuscript?

Try the yellow highlighter test: print a chapter, highlight summary lines and ask whether each compresses time, clarifies stakes or orients the reader. Use a scene vs summary map or the S/T/X triage to label beats and spot clumps of unnecessary telling.

These diagnostics expose where you should convert a summary into a mini scene or tighten a summary line with one sensory detail and a consequence.

How do I avoid exposition dumps and make backstory natural?

Braid exposition into action: feed necessary context through props, tasks or conflict at the moment of decision rather than in a standalone paragraph. Turn "as‑you‑know" explanation into a prop‑in‑motion or a line of dialogue that surfaces the fact as a wound, not a memo.

This approach prevents info‑dumps and keeps worldbuilding economical—for example in historical fiction or fantasy, let period constraints or magic costs show through character choices, not long descriptions.

Which line‑edit habits quickly make telling stronger?

Remove filter verbs (saw, felt, realised), cut adverbs that prop weak verbs, replace abstract nouns with precise concrete details, and end summaries on a shift—a decision, cost or question. Add one sensory hit to keep the line tangible.

A fast checklist: cut five filter words on a page, add two sensory specifics, sharpen three verbs and finish the paragraph with a forward‑driving hook; you’ll make telling read like showing.

How do I respect POV limits while using telling effectively?

Never state offstage facts a viewpoint character couldn't know. When you tell, deliver facts through what that character can observe, infer or believe—use their metaphors, phrasings and biases so the summary feels anchored in that mind.

If you need broader context, place it where a narrator with access can legitimately provide it, or fold necessary worldbuilding into other characters' actions so POV limits remain honoured and readers trust your narrative authority.

Writing Manual Cover

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent

Get free book