Essential Storytelling Rules

Gary Smailes
Gary Smailes | 4 February 2026
Essential Storytelling Rules

Story Foundations: What “Rules” Really Do

Writers love to ask about rules for the same reason drivers love to ask about speed limits. You want to know where the line is before you get pulled over.

Here’s the part nobody puts on a mug. Story rules are not laws. They’re tools. You use them to build clarity, tension, and reader trust. When a rule feels “broken,” what’s usually broken is the reader’s ability to follow you, or believe you, or relax into the ride.

So let’s talk about what rules are doing under the hood, and how you make them work for you instead of turning them into a guilt hobby.

Rules build trust, and trust buys you freedom

A reader starts your book with a quiet question: “Is this in good hands?”

They’re not looking for perfection. They’re looking for signals. Clean signals. The story knows what it is. The voice is steady. The pages don’t feel random.

When readers trust you, they follow you through difficult scenes, strange structures, unusual narrators, even missing quotation marks. When they don’t trust you, they stop giving you the benefit of the doubt. Every choice starts to look like a mistake.

So when someone says, “Never do X,” translate it. What they often mean is, “If you do X, you’d better be controlling the experience.”

Control is the real rule.

The core promise: what you’re telling the reader to expect

Every story makes a promise early. Sometimes you make it on purpose. Sometimes you make it by accident, which is a fun way to get one-star reviews.

Your promise has two big parts:

  1. Genre expectations
  2. Voice and tone consistency

Get those right and you earn patience. Get them wrong and readers feel tricked, even if the prose is strong.

Genre expectations: you’re writing a book, not a surprise party

Genre is not a marketing label slapped on later. Genre is a set of reader expectations about what kind of pleasure they’re here for.

A few blunt examples:

Notice what these expectations have in common. They are all forms of trust. The reader invests emotion and attention because they believe the story will pay them back in the currency they showed up for.

You don’t have to follow every convention. You do have to understand which ones you’re refusing, and what you’re offering instead. If you’re going to zig, you need to signal the zig early, not at page 240 when the reader thought they bought a zag.

A quick diagnostic: finish this sentence in one line.

“I’m writing a story where the reader comes for ___ and leaves feeling ___.”

If you can’t answer, you are driving without headlights.

Voice and tone: consistency from page one

Voice is the attitude behind the sentences. Tone is the emotional temperature in the room. Readers pick up both faster than writers think.

If page one is wry and intimate, then page fifty should not read like a police report. If the opening is bleak and brutal, then a sudden shift into sitcom banter feels like a different book wandered in.

This does not mean your story cannot change. Stories should change. Tone can darken. Voice can sharpen. The point is coherence. A steady hand guiding the shift.

Here’s a small exercise I give writers who think their voice is “all over the place.”

  1. Pull three pages: page 1, a random page in the middle, and a page near the end.
  2. Cover the character names and any obvious plot details.
  3. Read the pages aloud.

Ask yourself:

If the answer is no, you do not have a “range” problem. You have a control problem. Fixing it is often less about rewriting everything and more about deciding what attitude the narrator brings to the material, then holding that line.

Write a “story contract” in five bullets

This is the fastest way I know to clear the fog. Keep it short. Make it specific. If you can’t fit it into five bullets, you’re still negotiating with yourself.

Write these five lines and do not let them turn into paragraphs.

Here’s an example of what “specific” looks like:

Now you have something you can revise toward. You have a standard. When you wonder whether a subplot belongs, you measure it against the contract. Does it pressure the goal? Raise the stakes? Deepen the tone? Aim the ending?

If it does none of those, it’s decoration. Decoration is fine in a room. In a story, it eats time.

Identify your primary reader, and pick comparables like an adult

“Write for yourself” is comforting advice, and also useless when you’re stuck. You need a clearer target than your own mood.

Your primary reader is the person most likely to love this book. Not “everyone.” Not “people who like good writing.” A real reader with specific tastes.

Ask:

Then pick two or three comparable titles. Not aspirational masterpieces. Real comps. Books your reader would place next to yours and think, “Yes, same shelf.”

Comparables do three useful things:

Try this mini-audit with your comps:

  1. Read the first ten pages of each comp.
  2. Write down what the book promises in those pages. One sentence each.
  3. Compare those promises to your first ten pages.

If your opening pages are doing something different, ask yourself why. Maybe you have a better approach. Great. Then make sure the reader can tell. Signal the experience you intend to deliver.

Because the point of rules is not obedience. The point is agreement. You make a promise, the reader gives you their time, and both of you leave satisfied. That’s the deal. Keep the deal, and you get to break plenty of “rules” with a straight face.

Character + Desire + Stakes (The Engine of Every Scene)

If a scene feels flat, the problem is rarely your commas. The problem is fuel.

Stories move when someone wants something, runs into resistance, and stands to lose something if they fail. Want, obstacle, consequences. Keep those three in play and you can write a scene in a parking lot where two people talk about a missing stapler and readers still lean in.

Drop one of them and the scene turns into a weather report.

Want: give the character something to reach for

Start with desire. Not the big life desire you write on a sticky note. The desire in this moment, in this scene, in this room.

Desire does not need to be noble. Desire does need to be clear.

Notice how each one creates direction. A character reaching for something pulls the reader forward.

If you struggle to name what your character wants, you often have one of two issues:

  1. You are writing a scene because you need information on the page.
  2. You are writing a scene because the timeline says “something should happen here.”

Readers do not care about your timeline. They care about a person trying to get a result.

A quick fix is to ask a sharper question: What does your character want from the other person in the scene?

Even in action scenes, the same rule holds. Want does not disappear because bullets show up. Want gets louder.

External goal vs internal need: the productive argument inside your character

Most strong protagonists have two agendas.

These two should rub. If they align too neatly, your story gets polite.

Example: a detective wants to solve a case (external). The internal need is to prove she deserved the promotion everyone thinks she lucked into. Now every clue carries an extra weight. Every mistake becomes personal. Every scene has a second heartbeat.

Or take a romance example. He wants to win her back (external). His internal need is to stop using charm as a way to dodge honesty. Now the grand gestures are not enough, and the reader knows it.

You do not need to announce internal need in chapter one. You do need to write scenes where it leaks out. It leaks through overreactions, dodged questions, stubborn choices, and the one topic the character keeps circling without landing.

If your character feels thin, you may be writing external goal only. Add the internal need, then put them in conflict.

Stakes: make failure hurt in ways the character cannot shrug off

Want is motion. Stakes are pressure.

If the character fails, what changes?

If the answer is “they’ll feel bad” or “they’ll be disappointed,” you are asking the reader to bring their own urgency. Readers are generous, but they are not volunteers.

Good stakes land in places the character cannot replace easily. Money is replaceable in most stories. Trust is harder. Reputation, safety, custody, a career, a friendship, an identity they fought for, those bite.

Here’s a useful ladder for escalating stakes:

You do not need to start at public. Starting too big often turns characters into chess pieces. Start personal, then tighten the screws.

Let’s see how escalation works in plain terms.

A chef wants to keep her restaurant open.

Each layer gives you new scene material. New kinds of choices. New ways to twist the knife.

A note from the edit desk: stakes do not rise because you announce them louder. Stakes rise because the consequences get closer, more specific, and harder to undo.

Opposition: the scene needs a “no,” even if no one says it

Want and stakes are useless without resistance.

Resistance is not only villains twirling mustaches. Resistance is anything that blocks the desire.

The best opposition often comes from another character who wants something reasonable. When the other person’s “no” makes sense, you get friction instead of melodrama.

Example: your protagonist wants her father to sign a form so she can access an account. He refuses. Why? Because he thinks she will blow the money and he is trying, in his clumsy way, to protect her. Now the “villain” is love mixed with control. Good luck writing a boring scene with that setup.

Another example: your hero wants to confess. The opposition is internal. He cannot stand the idea of being seen as weak. So he jokes, he changes the subject, he picks a fight. The reader watches him sabotage himself and feels the tension rise, because we all recognize self-protection when we see it.

Here’s the test: if the protagonist can get what they want in under thirty seconds by asking nicely, your scene has no opposition. Give the other side leverage. Give them a reason. Give them a cost for saying yes.

The sentence that solves a lot of problems

For each major character, write this and do not get fancy:

“I want ___ because ___, but ___ stands in my way, so I will ___.”

Write it for your protagonist, then write it for the antagonist, then write it for the key supporting characters. You are building a network of desires, not a solo performance.

Example set, same story:

Now you have story. Not plot points, story. Every scene becomes a collision of plans.

If you cannot complete the sentence, you have fog. Fog leads to scenes where people talk around the point, then go home.

Raise stakes without turning your story into a hostage situation

Writers often hear “raise the stakes” and reach for explosions. You do not need explosions. You need cost.

Ask yourself: what does failure cost the protagonist that they cannot easily replace?

Try these categories:

Then make the cost show up on the page. Not as a speech, as a consequence.

Instead of “If I lose this case, my career is over,” show the boss removing their name from the file. Show a colleague avoiding eye contact. Show the email with “effective immediately.”

Consequences are how stakes become real.

A fast scene check you can do in two minutes

Before you move on from a draft scene, ask:

  1. What does the viewpoint character want right now?
  2. What stands in the way?
  3. What happens if they fail?
  4. What changes by the end of the scene?

If you cannot answer all four, the scene is running on fumes.

Fixing it often means one clean choice. Sharpen the want. Add a stronger “no.” Make the cost immediate. Force a decision. You don’t need more words. You need more pressure.

Cause and Effect: Plot That Feels Inevitable (Not Random)

Readers do not need to predict your plot. They do need to believe it.

Belief comes from cause and effect. One choice triggers a consequence. The consequence forces a new choice. Keep that chain unbroken and your story feels inevitable, even when the events are surprising.

Break the chain and you get the dreaded “Wait, why did that happen?” moment. Once a reader asks that, you are negotiating for their attention.

Coincidence is a spice, not dinner

Coincidence has one good job in fiction, getting people into trouble.

A character misses the train and bumps into the one person they hoped to avoid. Fine. That is the universe shoving them into the story.

Coincidence should not solve the problem. If the same character later finds the missing evidence because the wind blows a file folder open at their feet, the reader feels the writer’s hand on the scale.

A clean rule: luck can ruin your protagonist’s day, luck should not save it. The save comes from action, or from a choice with a price.

Every scene should change the situation

If a scene ends and the story world looks the same, the scene has not earned its space. “Change” does not need to mean a car chase. Change can be information, commitment, damage, or desire.

Here are a few solid ways a scene changes the situation:

Try this quick test. Summarise the scene in one sentence, then add, “Now they have to…” If you cannot finish that sentence, you wrote a moment, not a step.

Example:

Nothing explosive. Plenty of motion.

“And then” is a warning label

A lot of first drafts read like this:

“And then they go to the bar. And then she meets the informant. And then the informant tells her the name. And then they get chased.”

This is not a plot, it is a list of errands. The scenes sit next to each other, but they do not push each other over.

Cause and effect sounds different:

“She goes to the bar because she needs the informant. The informant refuses because he is being watched. She pushes anyway, so the watcher follows her out. The chase happens because she forced the issue.”

See the difference? Each beat has a reason. Each beat creates the next problem.

If you want a simple writing tool, replace “and then” with “because of this” and “therefore.” You will feel weak links immediately.

Introduce complications early enough to feel earned

Readers are patient with surprises. They are not patient with surprises that feel invented on page 240 because the plot needed a shove.

Earned complications have footprints. Not a neon sign, a footprint.

If the third act hinges on the hero’s allergy to penicillin, mention the allergy earlier, in passing, in a way that fits the moment. If the villain has access to the hero’s bank account, plant the moment the hero hands over their information, or shows the habit of reusing passwords, or trusts the wrong person with a login.

You are not hiding the twist, you are giving it roots.

A useful question during revision: When does the story first make room for this event? If the answer is “three paragraphs before it happens,” you are late.

Turning points force decisions, decisions create fallout

A turning point is not “something happens.” A turning point is “the character must choose.”

A letter arrives. Fine. The turning point is what your protagonist does with it. Burn it, open it, lie about it, run, confess, call the police. Choice is where character and plot lock together.

Then comes fallout. Fallout is the bill for the choice.

If your turning points feel soft, you likely have a scene where the character receives information and then the story moves on. Make the information demand action. Make inaction an action with a cost.

Here is a small example you can steal the shape of.

  1. She needs money for rent, so she takes a short-term job.
  2. The job requires a background check, so her old arrest surfaces.
  3. Her boss demands an explanation, so she lies.
  4. The lie works, so she gets promoted into a role with more scrutiny.
  5. More scrutiny exposes the lie, so she loses the job and the reference.
  6. Losing the reference forces her back to the person linked to the arrest.

No coincidence. No random. A chain of choices tightening like a knot.

Reverse outline: the editor’s truth serum

When I am editing a messy plot, I do not start by polishing scenes. I build a reverse outline.

Open your draft. For each scene, write one or two lines:

Then, between each scene, write one connector:

“Because of this… therefore…”

Be blunt. If you catch yourself writing “because the author needed them to go there,” you found the break.

Here’s what this looks like in practice.

That works.

Now the version that does not:

You feel the wobble. The docks might still belong in the story, but you have to build the bridge. Who told him to go. What clue pointed there. What pressure forced the timing. Cause, then effect.

Keep agency in the rescue

Put your protagonist in trouble with bad luck if you want. Readers will go with you. Save them with agency.

Agency does not mean the protagonist must win every fight. Agency means their choices matter, and the outcome grows from those choices.

If your hero survives because the villain slips on a banana peel, you did not write suspense. You wrote relief.

Let the hero survive because they planned, or because they took a risk, or because they made a hard call earlier and now the story pays it back.

Readers do not need perfection. They need consequence.

A quick revision exercise for “inevitable” plot

Pick a chapter you suspect is random. Do this:

  1. Write the chapter’s opening situation in one line.
  2. Write the closing situation in one line.
  3. Write the key decision that caused the change.

If you cannot name the decision, add one. If you name a decision and nothing changes, raise the consequence. If the consequence arrives from nowhere, plant the cause earlier.

Plot starts feeling inevitable when you stop asking, “What happens next?” and start asking, “What would this choice break?”

Tension, Pacing, and Payoff (Keeping Readers Turning Pages)

Tension is not gunfire. Tension is a question with teeth.

Will she get what she wants. Will he lose what he has. Will they say the thing they are avoiding. Will the secret stay buried.

Action scenes are loud. Tension is steady. You can build it in a kitchen, in a car, in a meeting room with bad coffee and worse motives. If a character has something to gain, something to lose, and someone pushing back, you have tension.

The trick is pacing it so the reader stays alert, not exhausted and not bored. Then you pay off what you set up, so the reader feels safe in your hands.

Tension lives in uncertainty, opposition, and emotional risk

If a scene feels flat, ask what is uncertain.

Not “What happens next in the plot?” That is your job. Ask what is uncertain for the character right now.

Uncertainty turns a simple exchange into a live wire.

Now add opposition. Opposition does not require a villain twirling a mustache. Opposition is anyone or anything refusing to cooperate. A locked door. A friend with different priorities. A body with a panic response. A deadline. A social rule.

Then add emotional risk, which is where readers lean in. Emotional risk is the cost of being seen. Confessing. Asking. Admitting weakness. Choosing someone and living with the fallout.

Here’s a small example.

Two characters sit down to talk about their relationship. No explosions. No chase.

That scene will pull pages, if you write it clean.

Pacing is a rhythm, not a speed setting

Writers love to say, “My book is fast-paced.” Fine. But fast all the time is noise. Readers need variation, the same way your lungs need both inhale and exhale.

A reliable rhythm is scene and sequel.

The names sound fussy. The concept is simple. Something happens. Your character feels it. Then they choose.

If you skip the reaction and decision, readers feel unmoored. Your character starts acting like a pawn. If you linger too long in reaction, readers feel stuck in emotional traffic.

A clean pattern looks like this:

  1. She confronts her editor about the missing advance.
  2. The editor stonewalls.
  3. She leaves furious, then panics in the stairwell because rent is due.
  4. She decides to call the one contact she swore she would never call again.

See what the “recovery” does? It does not slow the story, it sharpens the next move. It turns events into choices.

If your middle sags, you often have too many sequels in a row. Think: long talks, long thoughts, long backstory. If your story feels breathless and thin, you often have too many scenes in a row. Think: event, event, event, with no time for consequences to land.

Avoid stalls: three common ones and how to fix them

Stalls are where readers start checking page count. You feel them too, if you are honest.

1) Exposition dumps

Backstory is not the enemy. Untimed backstory is.

If you pause the story to explain how the magic system works, the reader asks, “Why do I need this right now?” If the answer is “for later,” you are asking for trust you have not earned.

Fix: make exposition answer an urgent question in the present scene.

Instead of: three paragraphs on the rules of the curse.

Try: one line of rule, one line of consequence.

“The curse triggers at dawn. She had six hours to find shelter, or her skin would split like paper.”

Now the rule matters.

2) Repeated beats

This is the scene you have written three times with different props. Another argument about the same issue. Another meeting where nobody decides anything. Another chase that ends with “they got away.”

Fix: force escalation or change the angle.

If you must revisit an issue, make the second version cost more. Add a witness. Add a deadline. Take away an option. Change who holds power.

A good question: What is different this time, and why does it hurt more?

3) Low-stakes conversations

People chatting is not a scene. People chatting while something is at risk is a scene.

Fix: give each speaker a private goal.

Before you write dialogue, jot two lines:

Then write. You will be shocked how quickly the talk tightens.

Setups and payoffs: promises, plants, and earned surprises

Every story makes promises. Some are obvious. The locked drawer. The stray comment about a sister nobody visits. The side character who knows too much. Some are subtle, like the tone telling the reader, “This will end badly.”

A setup is a promise. A payoff is you keeping your word.

You do not need to explain your setup. You need to place it so the reader notices, then forgets, then remembers at the right moment and feels smart.

Two rules keep you out of trouble.

1) Pay off the thing you point at

If you highlight an object, a fear, a relationship fracture, the reader expects it to matter. If it never does, the story feels sloppy, even if the reader cannot name why.

If the gun on the mantel is too loud, make the setup quieter. Do not hang a spotlight on it.

2) Match payoff size to setup size

A tiny setup should not trigger a huge twist unless you built supporting pressure elsewhere. If the only hint of betrayal is one vague glance in chapter two, and the third act reveals a decade-long conspiracy, the reader feels tricked, not surprised.

Payoffs land best when they are both inevitable and unpleasant. The character sees the consequence coming, and steps into it anyway.

End scenes with a turn, not a taper

A scene ending is a small contract with the reader. “Keep going, there is more.”

A weak ending fades out. A strong ending turns the situation.

Turns come in a few dependable forms:

Notice what these have in common. They change what the reader expects next.

A practical trick: write the last line of the scene as a problem, not a description. Not every time, but often enough to keep the story leaning forward.

Track reader questions like you track plot beats

Readers turn pages to get answers, or to avoid answers, because some answers hurt.

Every chapter should raise a question or resolve one. Preferably both.

The questions do not need to be giant mysteries. Small questions keep momentum without exhausting the reader.

Here’s an exercise I give writers when pacing goes mushy.

At the top of each chapter, write three reader questions you want active by the end. At the bottom, write what you answered and what you raised.

If you finish a chapter and you did not answer or raise anything, you wrote a pause. Pauses have a place, but they need a purpose. A pause with a new decision at the end works. A pause with nothing changing reads like you lost your nerve.

A mini checklist for your next revision pass

When you revise, do not ask, “Is this exciting?” Ask cleaner questions.

Answer those, and you stop begging the reader to keep going. You make it hard for them to stop.

Clarity on the Page: Show, Tell, and the Power of Specificity

Readers do not quit because your plot is “slow.” They quit because they are confused, or because they stop caring. Clarity fixes both.

Clarity is not simple writing. Clarity is the reader always knowing where they are, who is present, what is happening, and why any of it matters to the person we’re following. You are building a mental movie in someone else’s head. If you leave out the camera angles, the reader starts doing extra work. Nobody reads fiction for extra work.

So let’s talk about the three levers you control on every page: show versus tell, specificity, and viewpoint.

Show and tell: stop treating them like rival religions

“Show, don’t tell” has bullied writers for decades. Here’s the truth from an editor who has written those words in margins and regrets the unhelpful versions of them.

Show and tell are both tools. Use the right one for the job.

Show when the moment carries weight. When emotion shifts. When danger rises. When a relationship changes shape. When the reader needs to feel the scene in their chest.

Tell when you are moving the reader across time, distance, or routine. When details would bog the story down. When the information matters, but the moment does not.

A clean way to think about it: show for the turning points, tell for the hallways between them.

Here’s a quick before and after.

Telling at the wrong time:

Mara was nervous about the interview.

That line gives information but no experience. Worse, it’s generic. Nervous how? A little? A lot? The kind where you talk too fast, or the kind where you stop talking at all?

Showing where it counts:

In the lobby, Mara reread the first sentence of her cover letter until the words went soft. When the receptionist said her name, she stood too fast and clipped her knee on the table.

Now the reader gets nervousness through behavior. The body betrays her. The moment lives.

Now flip it.

Showing at the wrong time:

She brushed her teeth, rinsed the sink, found her keys, checked the lock, walked down three flights, pushed through the heavy door, stepped onto the sidewalk, scanned for a cab...

That is not a scene. That is surveillance footage.

Telling where it helps:

She left in a rush and arrived ten minutes early, breathless and annoyed with herself.

You moved us. You kept the energy. You saved your detail budget for the moment where detail pays interest.

A small revision trick: underline the sentences where you “tell” an emotion (angry, scared, happy, ashamed). Decide which ones deserve to be shown. Keep the rest. Yes, keep them. You are allowed.

Specificity: the fastest way to earn reader trust

Vague writing makes readers drift. Specific writing makes them see.

Compare these two lines.

The apartment was a mess.

Okay. A mess how? Laundry mess? Broken glass mess? A sad mess with unopened mail and a dying plant?

Try:

The coffee table was buried under takeout containers and unopened envelopes. A damp towel lay in the hallway like someone dropped it mid-sprint.

Now you have an apartment, plus a hint of story. Unopened envelopes suggest avoidance. The towel suggests urgency. Specific details do double duty when you choose them well.

A lot of writers hear “add detail” and start wallpapering the page. That leads to clutter. You do not need more detail. You need the right detail.

Here’s the rule I give writers who overwrite descriptions: pick two concrete details and one human reaction. Then move.

Example:

The room stank of bleach. The overhead light flickered. Nina kept her hands in her pockets so nobody would see them shake.

Replace “awful” with evidence

Your outline gave a perfect example, so let’s push it further.

Vague line:

It was awful.

Your reader asks, “Awful like what?” and you have already lost momentum.

Try a menu of options, depending on what “awful” means in your story.

Notice how each version points the reader toward a specific feeling without naming it. You are guiding the reader’s body, not handing them a label.

Anchor the reader: where are we, when are we, who is here

Confusion often comes from missing anchors. Writers know the setting, so they forget the reader does not.

You do not need a paragraph of description at the top of every scene. You need a few early cues.

Drop these in early, then let the scene run.

Example of an unanchored opening:

He walked in and froze. “What are you doing here?”

Where did he walk in? A bar? A hospital room? His own house? The question is fine, but the reader has no floor under their feet.

Anchored:

Ben pushed into the hospital family room and stopped. His sister sat on the sofa with a paper cup of coffee and his father’s coat on her lap. “What are you doing here?”

Now the room carries meaning. The coat carries meaning. The line lands.

Viewpoint discipline: keep one set of eyes per moment

Nothing wrecks clarity faster than slipping between heads without control. Readers do not always know how to explain the discomfort, they only know the story started to feel slippery.

Viewpoint discipline means we experience the scene through one character’s perception at a time. We stay in their knowledge, their blind spots, their assumptions.

Here’s what head-hopping looks like:

Talia hated the silence. Mark wondered if she’d found out. She looked calm, which made him nervous.

In three sentences we hopped twice. Now the reader has to reset.

Pick one viewpoint and stay.

Talia’s viewpoint:

Talia hated the silence. Mark’s face gave away nothing, but he kept rubbing his thumb along the edge of his glass. He was waiting for her to speak first.

Or Mark’s viewpoint:

Mark counted the seconds between her sips of water. Talia looked calm, too calm, and he could not tell if it was control or contempt.

Both versions are clear. Both build tension. The difference is commitment.

A good test: if your viewpoint character does not have access to a piece of information, you cannot state it as fact. You must filter it through observation or inference.

Not:

She was lying.

Better:

She met his eyes and smiled too fast. The smile stayed, but her voice tightened around the words.

Now the reader concludes “lying” on their own, which feels satisfying.

The clarity pass: a five-minute fix with big results

When a draft feels muddy, do a clarity pass on each scene. Do it fast. Do not debate. Ask these questions and mark the page where the answer is missing.

If you want an even simpler version, ask only two questions: “What am I looking at?” and “Why should I care?” If the page answers both, the reader stays with you.

Clarity is kindness. It’s also control. When the reader sees what you want them to see, in the order you want them to see it, you get to do the fun part. You get to hurt them at the right moment, then make them turn the page anyway.

Voice, Theme, and Meaning (Advanced Rules That Make Stories Stick)

Plot gets a reader through the night. Voice gets a reader through your whole book list.

When editors talk about “voice,” new writers often hear “style” and start reaching for fancy sentences. Leave the fancy sentences alone. Voice is simpler, and harder. Voice is consistency. It’s the steady attitude behind the prose. It’s what your narrator notices, what they ignore, what they judge, what they find funny, what they refuse to say out loud.

If your story were a person at a dinner table, voice is how they talk when the food arrives late.

Voice is what you notice, and how you choose to say it

Voice lives in three places:

  1. Diction: the words you reach for without strain. Short and blunt. Long and precise. Folksy. Clinical. Earnest. Snide.
  2. Observation: what your viewpoint character pays attention to. Shoes, exits, weather, status, hands, lies, receipts.
  3. Attitude: the tilt of the sentences. Sympathy. Contempt. Wonder. Suspicion. Weariness.

Here’s a fast demo. Same event, different voices.

Version A

The bus was late again. She checked her phone, then the street, then her phone. The stop smelled like wet cardboard.

Version B

The bus performed its usual magic trick, which involved not being there. She refreshed the app until her thumb cramped. The shelter reeked, as if rain had turned garbage into soup.

Neither version is “better.” They feel like different narrators. Different minds. Version A stays plain and close to the ground. Version B leans into sarcasm and sharper sensory choices. The point is consistency. Pick a lane and stay in it long enough for the reader to trust you.

A practical test: open to any page of your draft at random. Cover the character names. Read a paragraph. Do you still know whose head you’re in? Do you still know what kind of story you’re reading? If the answer is no, voice is wobbling.

A small voice drill you can do in ten minutes

Take one scene and rewrite the first paragraph three ways:

Do not change the events. Only change what gets noticed and how the sentences behave. One of the three versions will feel like the story. That’s your voice knocking.

Theme comes from decisions, not speeches

Theme is what your story keeps arguing about.

Writers get nervous about theme because they picture a chalkboard and a moral. That’s not how theme works on the page. Theme shows up when a character wants something, makes a choice, pays for it, and then makes the next choice with a new bruise.

If you want to kill theme, write a paragraph where a character explains the lesson to the reader. If you want theme to live, let the character act, then let the consequences land.

Here’s the difference.

Lecture

“You know, money isn’t everything,” Kara said. “Family matters more.”

Theme through consequence

Kara takes the promotion, misses her brother’s court date, and finds out he took a plea deal because nobody showed up. Now “family matters more” is not an idea. It’s a cost. The reader feels the weight because the story made the argument in action.

Theme also sharpens your revision choices. When you know what question your story is wrestling with, you stop adding scenes because they seem “cool” and start adding scenes because they press the wound.

Pick a thematic question, not a message

Messages sound like posters. Questions sound like stories.

A thematic question has tension built in. It invites conflict. It lets your characters disagree through their choices.

Examples:

Pick one. Write it at the top of your draft. Then, when you revise, test the key scenes against it.

Not every scene needs to hammer theme. You’re not pounding nails. You’re running a current through the book. The question should light up the moments that matter.

Here’s a simple way to test a scene: if you removed it, would the story lose pressure on the thematic question? If the answer is no, the scene may still belong, but you should know why. Comedy. Relief. Setup. Character texture. Fine. Be honest about its job.

Subtext: what people mean, versus what they say

Real people rarely speak their raw truth when something is at stake. They dodge. They posture. They bargain. They test. They tease. They lie with manners.

Subtext is the gap between the line of dialogue and the motive underneath it. It’s where relationships live.

When dialogue feels flat, the problem often is not the wording. The problem is both characters want the same thing in the conversation, or want nothing at all.

A good scene has conflicting wants.

Now the lines have something to do besides exchange information.

The “said vs meant” revision trick

This works because it forces you to write the argument under the argument.

Take a dialogue exchange from your draft. For each line, write what the character means in brackets. Then rewrite the spoken line so it hides the meaning while still pursuing the goal.

Example:

Flat

“Are you mad at me?”

“No.”

“You seem mad.”

“I’m fine.”

Everyone says what they say in every book. Nobody is doing anything.

Now add “meant”:

“Are you mad at me?”

[Please tell me we’re okay, I can’t handle another person leaving.]

“No.”

[Yes, and I want you to admit you know why.]

“You seem mad.”

[I need you to reassure me, and I need it fast.]

“I’m fine.”

[I’m punishing you. I want you to work for the reassurance.]

Rewrite with subtext:

“Are you mad at me?”

“Why would I be?”

“Because you haven’t looked at me in ten minutes.”

“I’m trying to finish this. Unless you want to help.”

Now we have movement. Deflection. A tiny shove. The tension rises without anyone announcing their feelings like a weather report.

You can push this further by adding a physical action that contradicts the spoken line.

“Why would I be?” He stacked the plates with enough force to rattle the cutlery.

The body tells the truth. The mouth negotiates.

Meaning is the aftertaste

When voice is steady, the reader trusts the storyteller. When theme is built from choices, the reader feels the story has spine. When subtext runs through dialogue, relationships gain heat and unpredictability.

Those are the “advanced rules,” but they’re not fancy. They’re disciplined. You decide what kind of mind is telling the story, what question the story worries over, and what your characters refuse to say when the stakes rise.

Then you put them in a room together and let them talk around the truth until somebody breaks. That’s where readers lean in.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do story "rules" actually do — do I have to obey them?

Story rules are tools that build reader trust by making the experience coherent and predictable in the ways that matter. You don't have to obey every rule rigidly; you need to control the effect of any deliberate break so the reader still understands the promise you made.

Translate rules into practical checks: does this choice respect genre expectations, sustain voice consistency, and keep the reader able to follow cause and effect? If yes, you can safely bend the "rule."

How do I write a one‑page "story contract" and use it during revision?

Write five short bullets: Protagonist, Goal, Stakes, Tone, End feeling — one line each. This one‑page story contract keeps you aligned when tempted by pretty scenes that do nothing for the main promise.

Use it as an editing compass: for any subplot or rewrite ask, "Does this strengthen the contract or distract from it?" If it distracts, cut, combine, or rewrite so every choice funnels toward that promise.

What quick test tells me if a scene earns its space?

Use the Goal / Conflict / Outcome labels for each scene: name what the viewpoint character wants in that moment, what blocks them on the page, and how the scene ends differently. If the outcome is "no change" the scene is probably a pause disguised as story.

When a scene fails, sharpen the want, add active opposition, or force a decision with immediate cost — small moves often convert a wandering scene into one with momentum.

How do I keep plot causal and avoid "and then" plotting?

Build cause and effect explicitly: for key events write "because" between them. If you find "because the plot needed it," you've found a weak joint. Strengthen it by adding a clear choice, mistake, reveal or deadline that makes the next scene inevitable.

Run a reverse outline as a diagnostic: one line per scene stating the change, the choice that caused it, and the immediate consequence. That exposes gaps where events currently sit side by side instead of pushing each other forward.

How can I raise stakes effectively without adding explosions?

Raise stakes by increasing cost, not volume. Escalate from personal (loss of income, trust) to relational (lost respect, damaged relationships) to public (career ruin, legal consequences). Make the cost specific and immediate so readers feel it on the character’s skin.

Show consequences rather than naming them: remove a reference, show a colleague avoiding eye contact, or let a trusted ally walk away. Those concrete outcomes make stakes feel real without resorting to spectacle.

How do I maintain viewpoint discipline and clarity on the page?

Anchor every scene quickly: where are we, when is it, and who is present. Then commit to one set of eyes per moment — avoid head‑hopping. If the viewpoint character cannot know a fact, show it through observation or inference, not as omniscient exposition.

Do a five‑minute clarity pass: mark missing anchors, define the viewpoint's immediate want, and confirm what changes by the end. If any answer is missing, the scene will likely feel muddy to readers.

How do voice, theme and subtext make a story stick in readers' minds?

Voice is the steady attitude of your narrator (diction, observation, attitude); theme emerges from decisions and consequences rather than speeches; subtext is the unspoken motive under dialogue. Together they create an aftertaste that keeps readers thinking about your book.

Practical drills: rewrite a paragraph in different emotional tones to find voice, label the thematic question at the top of the draft, and practise the "said vs meant" trick for dialogue so characters say one thing while wanting another underneath.

Writing Manual Cover

Download FREE ebook

Claim your free eBook today and join over 25,000 writers who have read and benefited from this ebook.

'It is probably one of the best books on writing I've read so far.' Miz Bent
Get free book